44 found
Order:
  1.  84
    Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus.Jonathan Ives, Michael Dunn, Bert Molewijk, Jan Schildmann, Kristine Bærøe, Lucy Frith, Richard Huxtable, Elleke Landeweer, Marcel Mertz, Veerle Provoost, Annette Rid, Sabine Salloch, Mark Sheehan, Daniel Strech, Martine de Vries & Guy Widdershoven - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):68.
    This paper responds to the commentaries from Stacy Carter and Alan Cribb. We pick up on two main themes in our response. First, we reflect on how the process of setting standards for empirical bioethics research entails drawing boundaries around what research counts as empirical bioethics research, and we discuss whether the standards agreed in the consensus process draw these boundaries correctly. Second, we expand on the discussion in the original paper of the role and significance of the concept of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  2.  69
    Do we understand the intervention? What complex intervention research can teach us for the evaluation of clinical ethics support services.Jan Schildmann, Stephan Nadolny, Joschka Haltaufderheide, Marjolein Gysels, Jochen Vollmann & Claudia Bausewein - 2019 - BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):48.
    Evaluating clinical ethics support services has been hailed as important research task. At the same time, there is considerable debate about how to evaluate CESS appropriately. The criticism, which has been aired, refers to normative as well as empirical aspects of evaluating CESS. In this paper, we argue that a first necessary step for progress is to better understand the intervention in CESS. Tools of complex intervention research methodology may provide relevant means in this respect. In a first step, we (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  3.  17
    Framework for evaluation research on clinical ethical case interventions: the role of ethics consultants.Joschka Haltaufderheide, Stephan Nadolny, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (6):401-406.
    Evaluation of clinical ethical case consultations has been discussed as an important research task in recent decades. A rigid framework of evaluation is essential to improve quality of consultations and, thus, quality of patient care. Different approaches to evaluate those services appropriately and to determine adequate empirical endpoints have been proposed. A key challenge is to provide an answer to the question as to which empirical endpoints—and for what reasons—should be considered when evaluating the quality of a service. In this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  4.  79
    Evaluation of clinical ethics support services and its normativity.Jan Schildmann, Bert Molewijk, Lazare Benaroyo, Reidun Forde & Gerald Neitzke - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (11):681-685.
    Evaluation of clinical ethics support services (CESS) has attracted considerable interest in recent decades. However, few evaluation studies are explicit about normative presuppositions which underlie the goals and the research design of CESS evaluation. In this paper, we provide an account of normative premises of different approaches to CESS evaluation and argue that normativity should be a focus of considerations when designing and conducting evaluation research of CESS. In a first step, we present three different approaches to CESS evaluation from (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  5.  17
    Outcomes of clinical ethics support near the end of life: A systematic review.Joschka Haltaufderheide, Stephan Nadolny, Marjolein Gysels, Claudia Bausewein, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2020 - Nursing Ethics 27 (3):838-854.
    Background: Clinical ethics support services have been advocated in recent decades. In clinical practice, clinical ethics support services are often requested for difficult decisions near the end of life. However, their contribution to improving healthcare has been questioned and demands for evaluation have been put forward. Research indicates that there are considerable challenges associated with defining adequate outcomes for clinical ethics support services. In this systematic review, we report findings of qualitative studies and surveys, which have been conducted to evaluate (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  6. Empirical research in medical ethics: How conceptual accounts on normative-empirical collaboration may improve research practice.Sabine Salloch, Jan Schildmann & Jochen Vollmann - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):5.
    BackgroundThe methodology of medical ethics during the last few decades has shifted from a predominant use of normative-philosophical analyses to an increasing involvement of empirical methods. The articles which have been published in the course of this so-called 'empirical turn' can be divided into conceptual accounts of empirical-normative collaboration and studies which use socio-empirical methods to investigate ethically relevant issues in concrete social contexts.DiscussionA considered reference to normative research questions can be expected from good quality empirical research in medical ethics. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  7.  75
    Research across the disciplines: a road map for quality criteria in empirical ethics research.Marcel Mertz, Julia Inthorn, Günter Renz, Lillian Geza Rothenberger, Sabine Salloch, Jan Schildmann, Sabine Wöhlke & Silke Schicktanz - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):17.
    Research in the field of Empirical Ethics (EE) uses a broad variety of empirical methodologies, such as surveys, interviews and observation, developed in disciplines such as sociology, anthropology, and psychology. Whereas these empirical disciplines see themselves as purely descriptive, EE also aims at normative reflection. Currently there is literature about the quality of empirical research in ethics, but little or no reflection on specific methodological aspects that must be considered when conducting interdisciplinary empirical ethics. Furthermore, poor methodology in an EE (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  8. Research participants’ perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.Flavio D’Abramo, Jan Schildmann & Jochen Vollmann - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):60.
    Appropriate information and consent has been one of the most intensely discussed topics within the context of biobank research. In parallel to the normative debate, many socio-empirical studies have been conducted to gather experiences, preferences and views of patients, healthy research participants and further stakeholders. However, there is scarcity of literature which connects the normative debate about justifications for different consent models with findings gained in empirical research. In this paper we discuss findings of a limited review of socio-empirical research (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  9.  88
    The normative background of empirical-ethical research: first steps towards a transparent and reasoned approach in the selection of an ethical theory.Sabine Salloch, Sebastian Wäscher, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):20.
    Empirical-ethical research constitutes a relatively new field which integrates socio-empirical research and normative analysis. As direct inferences from descriptive data to normative conclusions are problematic, an ethical framework is needed to determine the relevance of the empirical data for normative argument. While issues of normative-empirical collaboration and questions of empirical methodology have been widely discussed in the literature, the normative methodology of empirical-ethical research has seldom been addressed. Based on our own research experience, we discuss one aspect of this normative (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  10.  50
    Integrating Theory and Data in Evaluating Clinical Ethics Support. Still a Long Way to Go.Bert Molewijk, Jan Schildmann & Anne Slowther - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (4):234-236.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  11.  35
    Beyond integrating social sciences: Reflecting on the place of life sciences in empirical bioethics methodologies.Marcel Mertz & Jan Schildmann - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (2):207-214.
    Empirical bioethics is commonly understood as integrating empirical research with normative-ethical research in order to address an ethical issue. Methodological analyses in empirical bioethics mainly focus on the integration of socio-empirical sciences and normative ethics. But while there are numerous multidisciplinary research projects combining life sciences and normative ethics, there is few explicit methodological reflection on how to integrate both fields, or about the goals and rationales of such interdisciplinary cooperation. In this paper we will review some drivers for the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  12.  88
    Ethics by opinion poll?: The functions of attitudes research for normative deliberations in medical ethics.Sabine Salloch, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (9):597-602.
    Empirical studies on people's moral attitudes regarding ethically challenging topics contribute greatly to research in medical ethics. However, it is not always clear in which ways this research adds to medical ethics as a normative discipline. In this article, we aim to provide a systematic account of the different ways in which attitudinal research can be used for normative reflection. In the first part, we discuss whether ethical judgements can be based on empirical work alone and we develop a sceptical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  13.  74
    Knowledge, Experiences and Views of German University Students Toward Neuroenhancement: An Empirical-Ethical Analysis.Cynthia Forlini, Jan Schildmann, Patrik Roser, Radim Beranek & Jochen Vollmann - 2014 - Neuroethics 8 (2):83-92.
    Across normative and empirical disciplines, considerable attention has been devoted to the prevalence and ethics of the non-medical use of prescription and illegal stimulants for neuroenhancement among students. A predominant assumption is that neuroenhancement is prevalent, in demand, and calls for appropriate policy action. In this paper, we present data on the prevalence, views and knowledge from a large sample of German students in three different universities and analyze the findings from a moral pragmatics perspective. The results of our study (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  14.  46
    Methodological Reflections on the Contribution of Qualitative Research to the Evaluation of Clinical Ethics Support Services.Sebastian Wäscher, Sabine Salloch, Peter Ritter, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (4):237-245.
    This article describes a process of developing, implementing and evaluating a clinical ethics support service intervention with the goal of building up a context-sensitive structure of minimal clinical-ethics in an oncology department without prior clinical ethics structure. Scholars from different disciplines have called for an improvement in the evaluation of clinical ethics support services for different reasons over several decades. However, while a lot has been said about the concepts and methodological challenges of evaluating CESS up to the present time, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  15. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Ethikberatung im Rahmen der COVID-19-Pandemie.Georg Marckmann, Gerald Neitzke, Annette Riedel, Silke Schicktanz, Jan Schildmann, Alfred Simon, Ralf Stoecker, Jochen Vollmann, Eva Winkler & Christin Zang - 2020 - Ethik in der Medizin 32 (2):195-199.
    Das deutsche Gesundheitswesen steht durch die schnell steigende Anzahl an CO- VID-19-Erkrankten vor erheblichen Herausforderungen. In dieser Krisensituation sind alle Beteiligten mit ethischen Fragen konfrontiert, beispielsweise nach gerech- ten Verteilungskriterien bei begrenzten Ressourcen und dem gesundheitlichen Schutz des Personals angesichts einer bisher nicht therapierbaren Erkrankung. Daher werden schon jetzt klinische und ambulante Ethikberatungsangebote verstärkt mit Anfragen nach Unterstützung konfrontiert. Wie können Ethikberater*innen Entscheidungen in der Krankenversorgung im Rahmen der COVID-19-Pandemie unterstützen? Welche Grenzen von Ethikberatung sind zu beachten? Bislang liegen hierzu (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  16.  30
    Clinical ethics case consultation in a university department of cardiology and intensive care: a descriptive evaluation of consultation protocols.Michel Noutsias, Daniel Sedding, Jochen Dutzmann, Henning Rosenau, Kim P. Linoh, Nicolas Heirich, Stephan Nadolny, Jan Schildmann & Andre Nowak - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-12.
    BackgroundClinical ethics case consultations (CECCs) provide a structured approach in situations of ethical uncertainty or conflicts. There have been increasing calls in recent years to assess the quality of CECCs by means of empirical research. This study provides detailed data of a descriptive quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a CECC service in a department of cardiology and intensive care at a German university hospital.MethodsSemi-structured document analysis of CECCs was conducted in the period of November 1, 2018, to May 31, 2020. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  17.  47
    Was ist ein ethisches Problem und wie finde ich es? Theoretische, methodologische und forschungspraktische Fragen der Identifikation ethischer Probleme am Beispiel einer empirisch-ethischen Interventionsstudie.Sabine Salloch, Peter Ritter, Sebastian Wäscher, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2016 - Ethik in der Medizin 28 (4):267-281.
    ZusammenfassungEine wichtige Aufgabe empirischer Sozialforschung in der Medizinethik besteht darin, bisher unbekannte ethische Probleme zu identifizieren und zu beschreiben. Die Frage, welche Sachverhalte in den Gegenstandsbereich der Medizinethik fallen, ist jedoch sowohl aus wissenschaftlicher Sicht voraussetzungsreich als auch in der Praxis umstritten. Im Beitrag werden theoretische, methodologische und forschungspraktische Aspekte der Identifikation und Auswahl ethischer Probleme diskutiert und das Vorgehen am Beispiel einer konkreten empirisch-ethischen Studie illustriert. Der Schwerpunkt des Artikels liegt hierbei auf den Vorbedingungen sowie dem konkreten Vorgehen bei (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  18.  61
    Limitation of treatment at the end of life: an empirical-ethical analysis regarding the practices of physician members of the German Society for Palliative Medicine.Jan Schildmann, Julia Hoetzel, Anne Baumann, Christof Mueller-Busch & Jochen Vollmann - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (6):327-332.
    Objectives To determine the frequencies and types of limitation of medical treatment performed by physician members of the German Society for Palliative Medicine and to analyse the findings with respect to clinical and ethical aspects of end-of-life practices. Design Cross-sectional postal survey. Setting Data collection via the secretary of the German Society for Palliative Medicine using the German language version of the EURELD survey instrument. Subjects All 1645 physician members of the German Society for Palliative Medicine. Main outcome measures Types (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  19.  47
    Why the “Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation” Instrument Can and Should Further Inform Ethics Policy Work.Daniel Strech & Jan Schildmann - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (11):25-27.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  20.  61
    How Research on Stakeholder Perspectives Can Inform Policy on Cognitive Enhancement.Cynthia Forlini, Eric Racine, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (7):41-43.
  21.  60
    (1 other version)"Aufklärung im ärztlichen Alltag": Ein Lehrmodul zur integrierten Bearbeitung medizinethischer und -historischer Aspekte im neuen Querschnittsbereich GTE.Jan Schildmann, Florian Steger & Jochen Vollmann - 2007 - Ethik in der Medizin 19 (3):187-199.
    Historische, theoretische und ethische Aspekte der Medizin sind Lehrinhalte des medizinischen Ausbildungscurriculums, die in dem neu eingeführten Querschnittsbereich 2 "Geschichte, Theorie, Ethik der Medizin" (GTE) vermittelt werden sollen. Gegenstand dieser Arbeit ist die Darstellung von Unterrichtskonzept und Evaluationsergebnissen eines medizinhistorische und -ethische Inhalte intergrierenden Lehrmoduls zum Thema der Aufklärung und Einwilligung in Klinik und medizinischer Forschung. Die integrierte Vermittlung medizinethischer und -historischer Inhalte wurde von den Studierenden positiv bewertet. Die von den Kursteilnehmenden im Rahmen der Evaluation gezeigten Kenntnisse sowie die (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  22.  81
    Medizinethik und Empirie – Standortbestimmungen eines spannungsreichen Verhältnisses.Silke Schicktanz & Jan Schildmann - 2009 - Ethik in der Medizin 21 (3):183-186.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  23.  9
    Clinical Ethics Consultation: Theories and Methods, Implementation, Evaluation.John-Stewart Gordon & Jan Schildmann - 2010 - Routledge.
    This volume brings together a group of researchers from different European countries and disciplines who are involved in Clinical Ethics Consultation. The work provides a discussion on the theories and methods underlying CEC and on the issues of implementation and evaluation.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  24.  52
    Prinzip und Urteilskraft in der Medizinethik.Sabine Salloch, Jan Schildmann & Jochen Vollmann - 2012 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 60 (2):251-268.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  25.  44
    Der Beitrag qualitativer Sozialforschung zur handlungsorientierenden medizinethischen Forschung. Eine Methodenreflexion am Beispiel des ETHICO-Projekts.Jan Schildmann, Sebastian Wäscher, Sabine Salloch & Jochen Vollmann - 2016 - Ethik in der Medizin 28 (1):33-41.
    ZusammenfassungMedizinethische Forschung wird häufig unter Verwendung sozialempirischer Methoden durchgeführt. Insbesondere die Anwendung von Methoden der qualitativen Sozialforschung hat eine breite Akzeptanz gefunden. Nach Kenntnis der Autoren fehlen allerdings bislang Untersuchungen, die den spezifischen Beitrag qualitativer Sozialforschung für medizinethische Untersuchungen unter Bezugnahme auf die Merkmale qualitativer Methoden darlegen. Ausgehend von einem handlungsorientierenden medizinethischen Forschungsvorhaben zur Unterstützung der Entscheidungsfindung in der Onkologie wird der Beitrag der verwendeten qualitativen Methoden für das Forschungsvorhaben unter Bezugnahme auf zwei Kennzeichen qualitativer Sozialforschung – Rekonstruktion der sozialen (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  26.  60
    Setting standards for empirical bioethics research: a response to Carter and Cribb.Michael Dunn, Jonathan Ives, Bert Molewijk & Jan Schildmann - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):66.
    This paper responds to the commentaries from Stacy Carter and Alan Cribb. We pick up on two main themes in our response. First, we reflect on how the process of setting standards for empirical bioethics research entails drawing boundaries around what research counts as empirical bioethics research, and we discuss whether the standards agreed in the consensus process draw these boundaries correctly. Second, we expand on the discussion in the original paper of the role and significance of the concept of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27.  22
    From book to bedside? A critical perspective on the debate about “translational bioethics”.Alexander Kremling, Jan Schildmann & Marcel Mertz - 2024 - Bioethics 38 (3):177-186.
    The concept of “translational bioethics” has received considerable attention in recent years. Most publications draw an analogy to translational medicine and describe bioethical research that aims at implementing and evaluating ethical interventions. However, current accounts of translational bioethics are often rather vague and seem to differ with regard to conceptual and methodological assumptions. It is not clear and scarcely analyzed what exactly “translation” in the field of bioethics means, in particular regarding goals and processes so that it is justified to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  47
    Do Not Try To Run Before You Can Walk: Empirical and Meta-Ethical Presuppositions of Using Ethical Theory in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Joschka Haltaufderheide, Marcel Mertz, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (9):51-53.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  22
    Advance Care Planning (ACP) als Element eines klinisch-ethischen Unterstützungsangebotes – Darstellung und Evaluation.Andre Nowak, Kim Philip Linoh, Lilit Flöther, Jan Schildmann & Stephan Nadolny - 2023 - Ethik in der Medizin 35 (4):469-486.
    Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Advance Care Planning (ACP) wird auch in Deutschland zunehmend praktiziert. Aus klinisch-ethischer Perspektive bietet ACP eine Möglichkeit, Vorausverfügungen zu konkretisieren und auf diese Weise die Entscheidungsfindung bei fehlender Selbstbestimmungsfähigkeit von Patient:innen zu unterstützen. Während es für Gesprächsangebote im Sinne des ACP in Pflegeeinrichtungen und Einrichtungen der Eingliederungshilfe seit 2015 Finanzierungsmöglichkeiten gibt und erste Studien zu Angeboten veröffentlich wurden, fehlt es in Deutschland bisher an publizierten Evaluationsstudien zu ACP-Angeboten im Krankenhaus. Intervention und Methoden Im vorliegenden Beitrag erfolgt die strukturierte (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  29
    The Importance of Trust and the Importance of Trustworthiness.Sabine Salloch, Sebastian Wäscher, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):27-28.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  23
    Aid in dying.Jan Schildmann, Eva Herrmann, Nicole Burchardi, Ulrich Schwantes & Jochen Vollmann - 2004 - Ethik in der Medizin 16 (2):123-132.
    ZusammenfassungEntscheidungen am Lebensende sind Bestandteil der ärztlichen Tätigkeit. In dieser Studie wurden Berliner Medizinstudierende zu ihren Kenntnissen der rechtlichen Grundlagen und ihrer ethischen Bewertung von passiver und aktiver Sterbehilfe befragt. Im Wintersemester 2002/2003 wurde eine schriftliche Befragung zu ethischen und rechtlichen Aspekten der Sterbehilfe unter den Teilnehmenden eines Pflichtkurses für Medizinstudierende im fünften Studienjahr an der Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin durchgeführt. Gruppenunterschiede im Antwortverhalten wurden mit dem χ2-Test nach Pearson geprüft. Von 102 Studierenden beantworteten 85 den Fragebogen (Rücklaufquote = 82,5%). Es (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  32.  14
    Enhancement der Moral.Raphael van Riel, Ezio Di Nucci & Jan Schildmann (eds.) - 2015 - Mentis.
  33.  23
    (1 other version)„Personalisierte Medizin“ in der Onkologie: Ärztliche Einschätzungen der aktuellen Entwicklung in der Krankenversorgung: Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Interviewstudie.Sebastian Wäscher, Jan Schildmann, Caroline Brall & Jochen Vollmann - 2013 - Ethik in der Medizin 25 (3):205-214.
    ZusammenfassungDie öffentliche Diskussion um die „personalisierte Medizin“ legt nahe, dass mit diesem medizinischen Ansatz hohe Erwartungen an einen Beitrag zur klinischen Versorgung verbunden werden. Über die Wahrnehmungen und Bewertungen klinisch tätiger Ärzte ist jedoch wenig bekannt. Die vorliegende qualitative Interviewstudie gibt einen Einblick bezüglich des Einflusses „personalisierter Medizin“ auf die klinische Praxis aus ärztlicher Perspektive. Die Ärzte im vorliegenden Sample nehmen „personalisierte Medizin“ zwar als einen medizinischen Fortschritt wahr, sehen allerdings keine grundsätzliche Veränderung der bisherigen medizinischen Praxis. Als zentrales Problem (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  48
    On classifying the field of medical ethics.Kristine Bærøe, Jonathan Ives, Martine de Vries & Jan Schildmann - 2017 - BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):30.
    In 2014, the editorial board of BMC Medical Ethics came together to devise sections for the journal that would give structure to the journal help ensure that authors’ research is matched to the most appropriate editors and help readers to find the research most relevant to them. The editorial board decided to take a practical approach to devising sections that dealt with the challenges of content management. After that, we started thinking more theoretically about how one could go about classifying (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  16
    It’s About Heterogeneity! Strategies to Advance the Evaluation of Ethics Consultation.Joschka Haltaufderheide, Stephan Nadolny, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (4):56-58.
    In their national follow-up study on ethics consultation in the U.S., Fox et al. report the worrying finding of a decline in efforts to evaluate ECs. Compared to the findings of Fox et...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  49
    What Quality Is Actually Assessed Within Written Records?Bert Molewijk, Guy Widdershoven, Jochen Vollmann & Jan Schildmann - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (3):48-50.
    We congratulate Pearlman and colleagues (2016) on their detailed account of the development of a quality assessment tool for clinical ethics consultation (CEC), based on the evaluation of written r...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  13
    Relevance of a normative framework for evaluating the impact of clinical ethics support services in healthcare.Oliver Rauprich, Georg Marckmann & Jan Schildmann - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (12):987-988.
    Evaluating the impact of clinical ethics support services remains a challenging task. 1 Against this background, we applaud the authors for developing a theoretical framework that aims to explain how repeated moral case deliberations may promote ‘practical wisdom’ in healthcare professionals and improve the quality of care in health facilities. 2 In our view, it is of particular value to draw attention to the learning processes that may be induced by ethics support services. Understanding such learning processes on the individual (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Introduction.Sabine Salloch, Verena Sandow, Jan Schildmann & Jochen Vollmann - 2016 - In Sabine Salloch & Verena Sandow (eds.), Ethics and Professionalism in Healthcare: Transition and Challenges. Burlington, VT: Routledge.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  35
    “Ceteris Paribus” and Morally Relevant Facts.Jan Schildmann, Florian Bruns & Alexander Kremling - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (3):66-67.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  11
    Ethische Kompetenzen im Gesundheitswesen.Jan Schildmann - 2023 - Ethik in der Medizin 35 (2):165-167.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  11
    Empirische Forschung in der Medizinethik: Methodenreflexion und forschungspraktische Herausforderungen am Beispiel eines mixed-method Projekts zur ärztlichen Handlungspraxis am Lebensende.Jan Schildmann & Jochen Vollmann - 2009 - Ethik in der Medizin 21 (3):259-269.
    ZusammenfassungDer Beitrag empirischer Forschung zur Bearbeitung medizinethischer Fragestellungen ist Gegenstand eines aktuellen interdisziplinären Diskurses. Während die Anzahl empirischer Studien, die in medizinethisch relevanten Fachzeitschriften publiziert wurden, in den letzten Jahren zugenommen hat, liegen nach Kenntnis der Autoren kaum methodenreflexive Veröffentlichungen zu konkreten empirischen Forschungsprojekten in der Medizinethik vor. Die Untersuchung der Wechselbeziehungen von Ethik und Empirie anhand ausgewählter interdisziplinärer empirisch medizinethischer Forschungsprojekte erscheint aus mehreren Gründen von Interesse. Zum einen kann auf diese Weise der mögliche Beitrag empirischer Forschung zur Bearbeitung (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  24
    Kommentar II zum Fall: „Palliative Sedierung bei Malignom und Psychose?“.Jan Schildmann & Jochen Vollmann - 2013 - Ethik in der Medizin 25 (1):65-66.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  33
    Personalisierte Medizin. Medizinische, ethische, rechtliche und ökonomische Analysen.Jan Schildmann, Georg Marckmann & Jochen Vollmann - 2013 - Ethik in der Medizin 25 (3):169-172.
  44.  65
    Substitute decision making in medicine: comparative analysis of the ethico-legal discourse in England and Germany. [REVIEW]Ralf J. Jox, Sabine Michalowski, Jorn Lorenz & Jan Schildmann - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (2):153-163.
    Health care decision making for patients without decisional capacity is ethically and legally challenging. Advance directives (living wills) have proved to be of limited usefulness in clinical practice. Therefore, academic attention should focus more on substitute decision making by the next of kin. In this article, we comparatively analyse the legal approaches to substitute medical decision making in England and Germany. Based on the current ethico-legal discourse in both countries, three aspects of substitute decision making will be highlighted: (1) Should (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations