- Psychology in physical language.R. Carnap - 1961 - In Alfred Jules Ayer (ed.), Logical positivism. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.details
|
|
Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy. [REVIEW]David Christensen - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (5):754-767.details
|
|
Epistemology of disagreement: The good news.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.details
|
|
Disagreement as evidence: The epistemology of controversy.David Christensen - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (5):756-767.details
|
|
A Vindication of the Equal Weight View.Thomas Bogardus - 2009 - Episteme 6 (3):324-335.details
|
|
Logical positivism.Alfred Jules Ayer (ed.) - 1961 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.details
|
|
Peer disagreement and higher order evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2011 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 183--217.details
|
|
Disagreement.Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
How to Disagree about How to Disagree.Adam Elga - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 175-186.details
|
|
The moral evil demons.Ralph Wedgwood - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.Tom Kelly - 2005 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology Volume 1. Oxford University Press UK.details
|
|
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.details
|
|
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.details
|
|
Why (Wittgensteinian) Contextualism Is Not Relativism.Michael Williams - 2007 - Episteme 4 (1):93-114.details
|
|
The Agrippan argument and two forms of skepticism.Michael Williams - 2004 - In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Oxford University Press. pp. 121--145.details
|
|
The Nature of Normativity.Ralph Wedgwood - 2007 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.John Leslie Mackie - 1977 - New York: Penguin Books.details
|
|
A Neo-Pyrrhonian Response to the Disagreeing about Disagreement Argument.Diego E. Machuca - 2017 - Synthese 194 (5):1663-1680.details
|
|
On justifying and being justified.Adam Leite - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):219–253.details
|
|
Disagreement, Skepticism, and the Dialectical Conception of Justification.Markus Lammenranta - 2011 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 1 (1):3-17.details
|
|
Evidence: Fundamental concepts and the phenomenal conception.Thomas Kelly - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):933-955.details
|
|
Evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2006 - Philosophy Compass.details
|
|
Respecting the evidence.Richard Feldman - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):95–119.details
|
|
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.Fred Feldman & J. L. Mackie - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (1):134.details
|
|
Reflection and disagreement.Adam Elga - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):478–502.details
|
|
Concepts of Epistemic Justification.William P. Alston - 1985 - The Monist 68 (1):57-89.details
|
|
Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology.Michael Williams - 2001 - Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy.Diego E. Machuca (ed.) - 2011 - Springer.details
|
|
Epistemology and the Regress Problem.Scott F. Aikin - 2010 - New York: Routledge.details
|
|
Social Epistemology.Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar & Adrian Haddock (eds.) - 2008 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Hume’s Moral Theory.J. L. Mackie - 1980 - Boston: Routledge.details
|
|
Intellectual Trust in Oneself and Others.Richard Foley - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
Problems of empiricism.Paul Feyerabend - 1965 - New York: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
Empiricism and the philosophy of mind.Wilfrid Sellars - 1956 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1:253-329.details
|
|
Why social epistemology is real epistemology.Alvin I. Goldman - 2010 - In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press, Usa. pp. 1-29.details
|
|
The Need for Social Epistemology.Alvin I. Goldman - 2004 - In Brian Leiter (ed.), The Future for Philosophy. Clarendon Press. pp. 182-207.details
|
|
Pyrrhonism and the Law of Non-Contradiction.Diego E. Machuca - 2011 - In D. E. Machuca (ed.), Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy. Springer.details
|
|
Skepticism and Disagreement.Markus Lammenranta - 2011 - In Diego E. Machuca (ed.), Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 203-216.details
|
|
Disagreements, Philosophical and Otherwise.Brian Weatherson - 2013 - In Jennifer Lackey & David Christensen (eds.), The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 54.details
|
|
The Epistemology of Disagreement.Ernest Sosa - 2010 - In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press.details
|
|
A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification.David B. Annis - 1978 - American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (3):213 - 219.details
|
|
``Pluralism: A Defense of Religious Exclusivism".Alvin Plantinga - 1995 - In Kevin Meeker & Philip Quinn (eds.), The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 172-192.details
|
|
Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism.P. K. Feyerabend - 1967 - Critica 1 (2):103-106.details
|
|
Intellectual Trust in Oneself and Others.Richard Foley - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):482-484.details
|
|
Patterns of Discovery.Norwood R. Hanson, A. D. Ritchie & Henryk Mehlberg - 1960 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (40):346-349.details
|
|