Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217 (2007)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
How should one react when one has a belief, but knows that other people—who have roughly the same evidence as one has, and seem roughly as likely to react to it correctly—disagree? This paper argues that the disagreement of other competent inquirers often requires one to be much less confident in one’s opinions than one would otherwise be.
|
| Keywords | Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest disagreement, epistemic peer, conciliationism |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.1215/00318108-2006-035 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- doi.org
(no proxy) - philreview.dukejournals.org (no proxy)
- philreview.dukejournals.org [2] (no proxy)
- philreview.dukejournals.org [3] (no proxy)
- philreview.dukejournals.org [4] (no proxy)
- jstor.org (no proxy)
- pdcnet.org (no proxy)
- read.dukeupress.edu (no proxy)
- read.dukeupress.edu [2] (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions.Philip Kitcher - 1993 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Putting Logic in its Place: Formal Constraints on Rational Belief.David Christensen - 2004 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Reasonable Religious Disagreements.Richard Feldman - 2006 - In Louise Antony (ed.), Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life. Oxford University Press. pp. 194-214.
View all 32 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Higher‐Order Evidence and the Limits of Defeat.Maria Lasonen-Aarnio - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):314-345.
Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2010 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press. pp. 183--217.
Higher Order Evidence.David Christensen - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):185-215.
Evidence: A Guide for the Uncertain.Kevin Dorst - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (3):586-632.
View all 454 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Journalist as Source: The Moral Dilemma of News Rescue.David J. Vergobbi - 1992 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 7 (4):233 – 245.
Disagreement.Bryan Frances - 2010 - In Duncan Pritchard & Sven Bernecker (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. Routledge.
Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy.David Christensen - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (5):756-767.
Introduction: The Epistemology of Disagreement.David Christensen & Jennifer Lackey - 2009 - Episteme 6 (3):231-232.
Television News Ethics: A Survey of Television News Directors.Roger Hadley - 1989 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 4 (2):249 – 264.
Moral Intuitions, Reliability, and Disagreement.David Killoren - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 4 (1):1-35.
Disagreement.Graham Oppy - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1-3):183-199.
Balancing Good News and Bad News: An Ethical Obligation?Mary-Lou Galician & Steve Pasternack - 1987 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 2 (2):82 – 92.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
1,999 ( #2,206 of 2,499,034 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
268 ( #1,831 of 2,499,034 )
2009-01-28
Total views
1,999 ( #2,206 of 2,499,034 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
268 ( #1,831 of 2,499,034 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
