The objective of this paper is to outline challenges associated with the inclusion of welfare issues in breeding goals for farm animals and to review the currently available methodologies and discuss their potential advantages and limitations to address these challenges. The methodology for weighing production traits with respect to cost efficiency and market prices are well developed and implemented in animal breeding goals. However, these methods are inadequate in terms of assessing proper values of traits with social and ethical values (...) such as animal welfare, because such values are unlikely to be readily available from the product prices and costs in the market. Defining breeding goals that take animal welfare and ethical concerns into account, therefore, requires new approaches. In this paper we suggest a framework and an approach for defining breeding goals, including animal welfare. The definition of breeding goals including values related to animal welfare requires a multidisciplinary approach with a combination of different methods such as profit equations, stated preference techniques, and selection index theory. In addition, a participatory approach involving different stakeholders such as breeding organizations, food authorities, farmers, and animal welfare organizations should be applied. We conclude that even though these methods provide the necessary tools for considering welfare issues in the breeding goal, the practical application of these methods is yet to be achieved. (shrink)

Gli studi kierkegaardiani paiono oggi porre di fronte a un’alternativa che si potrebbe articolare nello stile del primo grande libro di questo pensatore: o i suoi scritti vengono interpretati come esposizione di un suo sistema filosofico, o vengono invece letti come scontri con il sistema hegeliano, e anzi con il sistema filosofico in generale. Se è questa la scelta di fronte a cui ci si trova, è perché la lettura di Kierkegaard si è a poco a poco cristallizzata, per non (...) dire bloccata, intorn... (shrink)

Humans are neophile, curious, and explorative animals with impressive capabilities for creative problem-solving. I discuss some of the ultimate roots behind human creativity while reviewing two books on creativity and problem-solving. To E. O. Wilson, the driv­ing force behind creativity is our instinctive love of novelty, and creativity’s ultimate goal is “self-understanding.” I elaborate on and question this assumption. The theories of inclu­sive fitness and group selection are discussed, with Wilson in favor of the latter. Finally, the theory of gene-culture (...) coevolution is introduced as fundamental to the unity of science and the humanities and to closing the gap between these two cultures. Eagleman and Brandt’s volume is more of an entertaining history of design and human inventiveness than a study in creativity as such. We hear about the three main operations of creative process: bending, blending, and breaking, and these operations are the primary means by which all ideas evolve, according to the authors. (shrink)

A Note on the Task of the Historian of PhilosophyAccording to this paper, the history of philosophy should be conceived as a normative as well as a descriptive discipline. If it is true that our approach to a philosophical problem will always engage us in the history of this particular problem, this does not mean, however, that the history of philosophy furnishes us with a positive basis on which the problem in question might be treated. The history of philosophy is (...) the history of what has been and thus it still demands philosophical thinking.Nota sul compito dello storico della filosofiaNel considerare la storia della filosofia come una mera “disciplina ausiliaria” della filosofia si rischia di introdurre in quest’ultima un’idea di storia come scienza positiva i cui presupposti sarebbero esentati da un’interrogazione filosofica. Come qualunque altra scienza, la storia della filosofia deve rinunciare a ogni pretesa di neutralità. Come la filosofia stessa la storia della filosofia non può basarsi su una qualsiasi positività. Inoltre, lo studio di un problema filosofico è sempre legato allo studio della sua storia. La storia della filosofia è normativa tanto quanto descrittiva, dal momento che è la storia delle esigenze di fronte a cui si trova regolarmente il pensiero filosofico. (shrink)

A Note on the Task of the Historian of PhilosophyAccording to this paper, the history of philosophy should be conceived as a normative as well as a descriptive discipline. If it is true that our approach to a philosophical problem will always engage us in the history of this particular problem, this does not mean, however, that the history of philosophy furnishes us with a positive basis on which the problem in question might be treated. The history of philosophy is (...) the history of what has been and thus it still demands philosophical thinking.Nota sul compito dello storico della filosofiaNel considerare la storia della filosofia come una mera “disciplina ausiliaria” della filosofia si rischia di introdurre in quest’ultima un’idea di storia come scienza positiva i cui presupposti sarebbero esentati da un’interrogazione filosofica. Come qualunque altra scienza, la storia della filosofia deve rinunciare a ogni pretesa di neutralità. Come la filosofia stessa la storia della filosofia non può basarsi su una qualsiasi positività. Inoltre, lo studio di un problema filosofico è sempre legato allo studio della sua storia. La storia della filosofia è normativa tanto quanto descrittiva, dal momento che è la storia delle esigenze di fronte a cui si trova regolarmente il pensiero filosofico. (shrink)

This article examines the Kierkegaard reception of the Danish theologians K. Olesen Larsen and Johannes Sløk, who both understood Kierkegaard as attempting to radically subvert the freedom of the human being. Initially, I show how current Kierkegaard research on the question of subjectivity, freedom and indirect communication differs from the readings of Olesen Larsen and Sløk. Subsequently, and in contrast to this, Olesen Larsen’s somewhat ambivalent attempt to read Kierkegaard as undermining human freedom is presented. Third, I (...) show how Sløk arrives at a somewhat similar result, though in a more coherent way. In conclusion, the article offers a brief discussion on the plausibility of this interpretation. (shrink)

Atheism; faith; religion and reason; God; proof; philosophy, modern; 20th century.

In rhetoric, an orator needs both a large vocabulary and a stock of commonplaces and arguments. Erasmus put them together in his De duplici copia verborum ac rerum . In this sixth volume of the first Ordo of the Amsterdam edition of the Latin texts of Erasmus, Betty Knott has edited the Latin text and added an English introduction and commentary, providing philological and historical information which helps the reader to understand the text and identify its sources.

Ghazzālī, 1058-1111; Kīmiyā-yi saʻādat -Criticism and interpretation ; Ghazzālī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad, -1126; Savāniḥ -Criticism and interpretation ; Ghazzālī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad, -1126; Baḥr al-muḥabbat fī asrār al-muvaddat fītafsīr Sūrah-i Yūsuf -Criticism.

On essence of Mādhyamika philosophy by Lcaṅ-skya II Rol-paʼi-rdo-rje, 1717-1786 and commentaries by Dkon-mchog-ʼjigs-med-dbang-po, Khri-chen-bstan-pa-rab-rgya, and Dalai Lama XIV Bstan-ʼdzin-rgya-mtsho, 1935-.

Collected works of Rol-paʼi-rdo-rje on the doctrines of Dge-lugs-pa (Sect) and Buddhist philosophy.

Study on the Qurʼānic teaching for ideal society.

Коллективный труд "Методология науки и антропология" подготовлен в Центре методологии и этики науки ИФ РАН. Он состоит из двух разделов. В первом разделе "Методология науки и антропологический поворот в философии".