Results for 'Group differences'

986 found
Order:
  1.  2
    Routledge Library Editions: Psychoanalysis. Routledge & Taylor & Francis Group - 2015 - Routledge.
    _Routledge Library Editions: Psychoanalysis_ brings together as one set, or individual volumes, a series of 8 previously out-of-print titles, originally published between 1923 and 1993. Written by international authors from a variety of backgrounds, this set looks at psychoanalysis in a number of different areas including, culture, religion, sociology, postmodernism, literary criticism and others.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  49
    Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart.Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter M. Todd & A. B. C. Research Group - 1999 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press USA. Edited by Peter M. Todd.
    Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart invites readers to embark on a new journey into a land of rationality that differs from the familiar territory of cognitive science and economics. Traditional views of rationality tend to see decision makers as possessing superhuman powers of reason, limitless knowledge, and all of eternity in which to ponder choices. To understand decisions in the real world, we need a different, more psychologically plausible notion of rationality, and this book provides it. It is about (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   263 citations  
  3.  17
    A Rhetoric of Argument.Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates Taylor & Francis Group - unknown
    This composition text focuses on argument and persuasion using examples, exercises, readings, and writing assignments. The text guides students through developing a thesis, finding and organizing evidence, and writing and revising several different types of argumentative papers. The second edition de-emphasizes the language of formal logic, and all the readings, examples, and exercises have been updated. Additional coverage has been given to refutation. Widely used in both advanced composition and second semester freshman courses.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  14
    Jumping to conclusions is differently associated with specific subtypes of delusional experiences: An exploratory study in first-episode psychosis.L. Diaz-Cutraro, H. Garcia-Mieres, R. Lopez-Carrilero, M. Ferrer, M. Verdaguer-Rodriguez, M. L. Barrigon, A. Barajas, E. Grasa, E. Pousa, E. Lorente, I. Ruiz-Delgado, F. Gonzalez-Higueras, J. Cid, C. Palma-Sevillano, S. Moritz, Group Spanish Metacognition & S. Ochoa - 2021 - Schizophrenia Research 228:357–359.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  46
    Addressing the Ethical Challenges in Genetic Testing and Sequencing of Children.Ellen Wright Clayton, Laurence B. McCullough, Leslie G. Biesecker, Steven Joffe, Lainie Friedman Ross, Susan M. Wolf & For the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Group - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (3):3-9.
    American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) recently provided two recommendations about predictive genetic testing of children. The Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium's Pediatrics Working Group compared these recommendations, focusing on operational and ethical issues specific to decision making for children. Content analysis of the statements addresses two issues: (1) how these recommendations characterize and analyze locus of decision making, as well as the risks and benefits of testing, and (2) whether the guidelines conflict (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  6. The Egalitarian Fallacy: Are Group Differences Compatible with Political Liberalism?Jonathan Anomaly & Bo Winegard - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (2):433-444.
    Many people greet evidence of biologically based race and sex differences with extreme skepticism, even hostility. We argue that some of the vehemence with which many intellectuals in the West resist claims about group differences is rooted in the tacit assumption that accepting evidence for group differences in socially valued traits would undermine our reasons to treat people with respect. We call this theegalitarian fallacy. We first explain the fallacy and then give evidence that self-described (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  7.  38
    Group differences ≢ individual differences.C. S. Bergeman & A. D. Seroczynski - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (3):546-548.
    Mealey's etiological distinction between primary and secondary sociopathy blurs the delineation between individual and group differences. She uses physiological evidence to support her claim of genetic influences, neglecting variability within social classes, frequency of delinquent behavior in upper and middle classes (measured by self-report), and discontinuity of criminal behavior across the life span. Finally, Mealey's proposals for differential intervention fall short of a future agenda, which should tailor to individual needs, not social classes.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Research on group differences in intelligence: A defense of free inquiry.Nathan Cofnas - 2020 - Philosophical Psychology 33 (1):125-147.
    In a very short time, it is likely that we will identify many of the genetic variants underlying individual differences in intelligence. We should be prepared for the possibility that these variants are not distributed identically among all geographic populations, and that this explains some of the phenotypic differences in measured intelligence among groups. However, some philosophers and scientists believe that we should refrain from conducting research that might demonstrate the (partly) genetic origin of group differences (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  9.  29
    Age-group differences in interference from young and older emotional faces.Natalie C. Ebner & Marcia K. Johnson - 2010 - Cognition and Emotion 24 (7):1095-1116.
  10.  22
    Group differences: is the good society impossible?James R. Flynn - 1996 - Journal of Biosocial Science 28 (4):573-585.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  5
    Group Differences and Similarities in Mental Representation Structure of Tennis Serve.Michael Gromeier, Christopher Meier & Thomas Schack - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  37
    Articulating group differences: A variety of autocentrisms.Alam M. Shahid - 2003 - Science and Society 67 (2):205 - 217.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship.Iris Marion Young - 1989 - Ethics 99 (2):250-274.
  14.  50
    Differential K theory and group differences in intelligence.J. Philippe Rushton - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):239-240.
  15. Polity and group difference: a critique of the ideal of universal citizenship.Iris Marion Young - 2002 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16. Educability and Group Differences.H. J. Eysenck - 1973 - Journal of Biosocial Science 5 (4):565.
  17.  26
    Deliberating through Group Differences in Education for Trust and Respect.Sheron Fraser-Burgess - 2011 - Journal of Thought 46 (3-4):45.
  18.  40
    Moral distress in paediatric oncology: Contributing factors and group differences.Pernilla Pergert, Cecilia Bartholdson, Klas Blomgren & Margareta af Sandeberg - 2019 - Nursing Ethics 26 (7-8):2351-2363.
    Background:Providing oncological care to children is demanding and ethical issues concerning what is best for the child can contribute to moral distress.Objectives:To explore healthcare professionals’ experiences of situations that generate moral distress in Swedish paediatric oncology.Research design:In this national study, data collection was conducted using the Swedish Moral Distress Scale-Revised. The data analysis included descriptive statistics and non-parametric analysis of differences between groups.Participants and research context:Healthcare professionals at all paediatric oncology centres in Sweden were invited to participate. A total (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  19.  11
    Educability and Group Differences. By Arthur R. Jensen. Pp. xiii+ 407. (Methuen & Co. 1973.) Price £3.90. [REVIEW]H. J. Eysenck - 1973 - Journal of Biosocial Science 5 (4):565-567.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  18
    Changes in United States Latino/a High School Students’ Science Motivational Beliefs: Within Group Differences Across Science Subjects, Gender, Immigrant Status, and Perceived Support.Ta-Yang Hsieh, Yangyang Liu & Sandra D. Simpkins - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Science motivational beliefs are crucial for STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) performance and persistence, but these beliefs typically decline during high school. We expanded the literature on adolescents’ science motivational beliefs by examining: 1) changes in motivational beliefs in three specific science subjects, 2) how gender, immigrant generation status, and perceived support from key social agents predicted differences in adolescents’ science motivational beliefs, and 3) these processes among Latino/as in the United States, whose underrepresentation in STEM is understudied. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  29
    An equal start: absence of group differences in cognitive, social, and neural measures prior to music or sports training in children.Assal Habibi, Beatriz Ilari, Kevin Crimi, Michael Metke, Jonas T. Kaplan, Anand A. Joshi, Richard M. Leahy, David W. Shattuck, So Y. Choi, Justin P. Haldar, Bronte Ficek, Antonio Damasio & Hanna Damasio - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
  22. Group-level differences in visual search asymmetry.Emily S. Cramer, Michelle J. Dusko & Ronald A. Rensink - 2016 - Attention Perception and Psychophysics 78:1585-1602.
    East Asians and Westerners differ in various aspects of perception and cognition. For example, visual memory for East Asians is believed to be more influenced by the contextual aspects of a scene than is the case for Westerners (Masuda & Nisbett, 2001). There are also differences in visual search: for Westerners, search for a long line among short is faster than for short among long, whereas this difference does not appear to hold for East Asians (Ueda et al., submitted). (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23.  33
    Effects of Working Memory Capacity on Metacognitive Monitoring: A Study of Group Differences Using a Listening Span Test.Mie Komori - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24.  40
    System-justifying motives can lead to both the acceptance and the rejection of innate explanations for group differences.Eric Luis Uhlmann, Luke Zhu, Victoria L. Brescoll & George E. Newman - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):503-504.
    Recent experimental evidence indicates that intuitions about inherence and system justification are distinct psychological processes, and that the inherence heuristic supplies important explanatory frameworks that are accepted or rejected based on their consistency with one's motivation to justify the system.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  25.  21
    Linking the Positivity Effect in Attention with Affective Outcomes: Age Group Differences and the Role of Arousal.Cathleen Kappes, Berit Streubel, Kezia L. Droste & Kristian Folta-Schoofs - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  23
    The cognitive, emotional, and social impact of the September 11th Attacks: Group differences in memory for the reception context and its determinants.Olivier Luminet, Antonietta Curci, Elizabeth J. Marsh, Ineke Wessel, Ticu Constantin, Faruk Gencoz, Masao Yogo, Boicho N. Kokinov & William Hirst - 2003 - In B. Kokinov & W. Hirst (eds.), Constructive Memory. New Bulgarian University.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27. Difference and Robustness in the Patterns of Philosophical Intuition Across Demographic Groups.Joshua Knobe - 2023 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 14 (2):435-455.
    In a recent paper, I argued that philosophical intuitions are surprisingly robust both across demographic groups and across development. Machery and Stich reply by reviewing a series of studies that do show significant differences in philosophical intuition between different demographic groups. This is a helpful point, which gets at precisely the issues that are most relevant here. However, even when one looks at those very studies, one finds truly surprising robustness. In other words, despite the presence of statistically significant (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  28.  42
    Individual differences in metacontrast masking: A call for caution when interpreting group data☆.Thorsten Albrecht & Uwe Mattler - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (2):672-673.
    In this issue of Consciousness and Cognition, Bachmann comments on our study , which revealed two groups of observers with qualitative individual differences in metacontrast masking that are enhanced by perceptual learning. We are pleased that our study receives this attention and even more about Bachmann’s extremely positive comments. In this invited reply we argue that observers seem to be similar only at the beginning of the experiment but they have no choice as to which group to join. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29. Do Different Groups Have Different Epistemic Intuitions? A Reply to Jennifer Nagel1.Stephen Stich - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (1):151-178.
    Intuitions play an important role in contemporary epistemology. Over the last decade, however, experimental philosophers have published a number of studies suggesting that epistemic intuitions may vary in ways that challenge the widespread reliance on intuitions in epistemology. In a recent paper, Jennifer Nagel offers a pair of arguments aimed at showing that epistemic intuitions do not, in fact, vary in problematic ways. One of these arguments relies on a number of claims defended by appeal to the psychological literature on (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  30.  6
    Demographic differences in public acceptance of waste-to-energy incinerators in China: High perceived stress group vs. low perceived stress group.Jiabin Chen, Xinyao He, Ye Shen, Yiwei Zhao, Caiyun Cui & Yong Liu - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Demographic characteristics have been recognized as an important factor affecting public acceptance of waste-to-energy incineration facilities. The present study explores whether the differences in public acceptance of WTE incineration facilities caused by demographic characteristics are consistent in residential groups under different perceived stress using data collected by a large-scale questionnaire survey conducted in three second-tier cities in China. The result of data analysis using a T-test shows firstly that people with low perceived stress have higher public acceptance of WTE (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  7
    Difference-making and the control relation that grounds responsibility in hierarchical groups.Johannes Himmelreich - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-28.
    Hierarchical groups shape social, political, and personal life. This paper concerns the question of how individuals within such groups can be responsible. The paper explores how individual responsibility can be partially grounded in difference-making. The paper concentrates on the control condition of responsibility and takes into view three distinct phenomena of responsibility in hierarchical groups. First, a superior can be responsible for outcomes that her subordinates bring about. Second, a subordinate can be responsible although she is unable to prevent the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  21
    Different Minority Groups Elicit Different Safety, Economic, Power, and Symbolic Threats.Dóra Kanyicska Belán & Miroslav Popper - 2023 - Human Affairs 33 (1):51-66.
    Populistic political discourse often portrays ethnic minorities as threats to the majority society. However, the deeper characteristics of perceived threats have not been sufficiently empirically investigated. The goal of this study is to identify the similarities and differences in intergroup threats perceived by Slovak majority from Roma, Muslims, and ethnic Hungarian minorities. The participants included 1244 adults who were instructed to write the first five associations that came to mind when thinking about one of the minorities. Our findings indicate (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  13
    Applying Different Concepts and Conceptions of Legitimacy to the International Level: Service, Free Group Agents, and Autonomy.Antoinette Scherz - 2023 - Moral Philosophy and Politics (1):63-85.
    International institutions are facing increasing criticism of the legitimacy of their authority. But what does it mean for an international institution to be legitimate? Arthur Applbaum’s latest book provides a convincing new concept of legitimacy, namely, the power-liability view, and a new normative conception, the free group agent account. However, it is not clear how they can be applied to the international level. First, this paper examines how different concepts of legitimacy can be applied to international institutions. Second, it (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  47
    Do Different Groups Have Different Epistemic Intuitions? A Reply to Jennifer Nagel.Jennifer Nagel - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (1):151-178.
    Do epistemic intuitions tell us anything about knowledge? Stich has argued that we respond to cases according to our contingent cultural programming, and not in a manner that tends to reveal anything significant about knowledge itself. I’ve argued that a cross-culturally universal capacity for mindreading produces the intuitive sense that the subject of a case has or lacks knowledge. This paper responds to Stich’s charge that mindreading is cross-culturally varied in a way that will strip epistemic intuitions of their evidential (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  35.  5
    When Different Language Groups Meet Online: Covert and Overt Focus on Form in Text-Based Chats.Ruiling Feng, Kyunghee Pyun, Wenzhong Zhang & Rafael Márquez Flores - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
    Focus on form has been extensively studied in text-based online dyadic chats but much less has been explored in group chats with interlocutors from different language backgrounds. Additionally, there are very few studies investigating covert focus on form. This study investigated the effects of interlocutor types on errors and focus on form episodes, both covert and overt, in text-based online group chats. We collected chat logs from two collaborative online international learning projects. One project was developed for the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  8
    Individual Differences in Personality Moderate the Effects of Perceived Group Deprivation on Violent Extremism: Evidence From a United Kingdom Nationally Representative Survey.Bettina Rottweiler & Paul Gill - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Numerous studies argue that perceived group deprivation is a risk factor for radicalization and violent extremism. Yet, the vast majority of individuals, who experience such circumstances do not become radicalized. By utilizing models with several interacting risk and protective factors, the present analysis specifies this relationship more concretely. In a large United Kingdom nationally representative survey, we examine the effects of group-based relative deprivation on violent extremist attitudes and violent extremist intentions, and we test whether this relationship is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  28
    Qualitative Differences between Two Methods of Ethics Education: Focus Group Results.Toby Schonfeld, Kristina Johnson, Ethan Seville, Colleen Suratt & Jennifer Goedken - 2015 - Ethics and Social Welfare 9 (3):240-254.
  38.  5
    Different Reality? Generations’ and Religious Groups’ Views of Spirituality Policies in the Workplace.Patricia Jolliffe & Scott Foster - 2021 - Journal of Business Ethics 181 (2):451-470.
    AbstractOver the past 20 years, there has been considerable expansion, particularly spirituality theory in the workplace. Simultaneously, there has been a growth of research, most especially in practitioner publication into generational differences. The study's context is human resource (HR) policy and procedures in the workplace. Through this prism, generational perspectives and religious theory are compared and scrutinised within the United Kingdom. Two major religious groups (Muslim and Christian) and three-generational categories (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) were selected to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  8
    Group members differ in relative prototypicality: Effects on the individual and the group.Michael A. Hogg - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.
    All groups are differentiated into more or less group-prototypical members. Central members readily influence and lead the group, and they define its identity. Peripheral members can feel voiceless and marginalized, as well as uncertain about their membership status – they may engage in extreme behaviors to try to win acceptance. These relative prototypicality dynamics sometimes benefit group performance but sometimes compromise performance.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  20
    Differences in the Visual Perception of Symmetric Patterns in Orangutans and Two Human Cultural Groups: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study.Cordelia Mühlenbeck, Katja Liebal, Carla Pritsch & Thomas Jacobsen - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
  41.  18
    Exploring Influences of Different Communication Approaches on Consumer Target Groups for Ethically Produced Beef.Antje Risius & Ulrich Hamm - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (3):325-340.
    Communicating the process quality of ethically produced food effectively is of highest interest to policy makers, organizations, retailers and producers in order to enhance ethical food production and increase ethical label use. The objective of this paper is to unveil the effectiveness of different communication treatments in regard to changing purchase behavior of different consumer groups. Different communication material for beef produced according to consumer expectations was compiled and applied in a consumer survey—incorporating a choice experiment and a questionnaire—with 676 (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  12
    Combining different activities in family-style group care: How Professional Foster Parents show listenership towards adolescents during dinner related activities.Martine Noordegraaf & Ellen Schep - 2022 - Discourse Studies 24 (3):350-370.
    This research focuses on dinner conversations in family-style group care. Children, who cannot live with their biological families anymore, are given shelter in these family-style group care settings. For the development of an attachment relationship between children and their Professional Foster Parents, it is important that the children feel that they are listened to in order to get an affective and intimate relationship with the parents. In this conversation-analytic research we analysed PFPs’ involvement in multiple activities simultaneously, namely (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  34
    Hemifacial differences in the in‐group advantage in emotion recognition.Hillary Anger Elfenbein, Manas Mandal, Nalini Ambady, Susumu Harizuka & Surender Kumar - 2004 - Cognition and Emotion 18 (5):613-629.
  44.  46
    Groups can make a difference: voting power measures extended. [REVIEW]Claus Beisbart - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (3):469-488.
    The voting power of a voter—the extent to which she can affect the outcome of a collective decision—is often quantified in terms of the probability that she is critical. This measure is extended to a series of power measures of different ranks. The measures quantify the extent to which a voter can be part of a group that can jointly make a difference as to whether a bill passes or not. It is argued that the series of these measures (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  45. Ethical perception: are differences between ethnic groups situation dependent?Jo Ann Ho - 2010 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 19 (2):154-182.
    This study was conducted to determine how culture influences the ethical perception of managers. Most studies conducted so far have only stated similarities and differences in ethical perception between cultural or ethnic groups and little attention has been paid towards understanding how cultural values influence the ethnic groups' ethical perception. Moreover, most empirical research in this area has focused on moral judgement, moral decision making and action, with limited empirical work in the area of ethical perception. A total of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  46.  22
    Hemifacial differences in the in-group advantage in.Susumu Harizuka & Surender Kumar - 2004 - Cognition and Emotion 18 (5):613-629.
  47.  35
    The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies.Bruce Edmonds - unknown
    This book is an argument for the importance of diversity in society. It is not naive, in the sense that it does not argue that any diversity is helpful, but rather tries to distinguish some of the ways in which it can be helpful and, hence, some the conditions under which it can be helpful. It does this is a largely non technical language and using informal argument using argument, examples and a review of the evidence to support its conclusions. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  28
    Hemifacial differences in the in-group advantage in.Hillary Anger Elfenbein, Manas K. Mandal, Nalini Arnbady, Susumu Harizuka & Surender Kurnar - 2004 - Cognition and Emotion 8 (5):613-629.
  49.  30
    Different vehicles for group selection in humans.Michael E. Hyland - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4):628-628.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  9
    Underlying Differences Between Chinese Omnivores and Vegetarians in the Evaluations of Different Dietary Groups.Qirui Tian, Qingyang Zheng & Shouxin Li - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 986