About this topic
Summary Informal Logic is not an alternative to formal logic. It is, broadly, the normative philosophical study of reasoning, inference and argumentation in natural language. Informal logic seeks to provide advice to "real life" arguers in the hopes of enabling them to argue more reasonably, to avoid fallacies, and to achieve greater success in persuasion through cogent, well-reasoned argumentation. Another goal of informal logic is to improve the teaching of reasoning skills.  Some issues that might be considered distinctive to informal logic include: the metaphysical question of whether arguments are abstract objects, events, or something else, what makes arguments in natural languages good or bad, the relationship between argument and justification, theories of virtuous arguing, the nature of fallacies, the problem of deep disagreement between both peer and non-peer arguers, the nature of multi-modal arguments (arguments critically involving non-linguistic elements like images or sounds), and how to achieve more socially just norms and practices of everyday argumentation.
Key works Many of the interests now gathered under the banner of informal logic well predate the emergence of the field as a distinct area of study. Arguably, the tradition begins with Aristotle, the Organon and the Rhetoric both being of central relevance. The first section of Hansen & Pinto 1995 contains entries by writers like Locke, Whately, and Mill, all of whom are important for the history of informal logic. In the 20th century, Hamblin 1970, Toulmin 1958, and Perelman 1969 are considered seminal works in the field. Wellman 1971 is important because it is a point of continuity between the history of attempts in ethics to arrive at standards of good moral reasoning distinct from the canons of formal deductive logic, and informal logic's broader attempt to do the same. A good guide to the early history of informal logic can be found in Johnson 1996. It is also important to note the confluence between early work on critical thinking and informal logic. This is captured in Johnson 2012.
Introductions Walton 2008 and Govier 1985 are accessible textbooks by two of the field's most influential writers. Important technical treatments showcasing the current diversity of approaches within informal logic include the following: Pinto 2003, Tindale 2013, Johnson 2000, Freeman 2005, Walton et al 2008, Hitchcock 2006, Groarke 2015 and Finocchiaro 2013.
Related categories

5218 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 5218
  1. Towards a Stronger Concept of Argument.Luis Felipe Bartolo Alegre - manuscript
    The standard definition of “argument” is satisfied by any series of statements in which one (of the statements) is marked as the conclusion of the others. This leads to the counter-intuitive result that “I like cookies, therefore, all swans are white” is an argument, since “therefore” marks “all swans are white” as the conclusion of “I like cookies”. This objection is often disregarded by stating that, although the previous sequence is an argument, it fails to be a good one. However, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. How To Argue (And How Not To).Danny Frederick - manuscript
    I distinguish arguments and arguing and I explain some important logical features of arguments. I then explain how philosophers have been misled, apparently by Euclid, into giving seriously mistaken accounts of arguing. I give a few examples. I then offer a seven-step guide on how to argue. After that, I conclude.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Any Dispute May Be Resolved By Argument But Rational People May Disagree About Anything.Danny Frederick - manuscript
    Two common claims in philosophy are that deep disagreements cannot, in principle, be resolved by argument and that normal disagreements will be resolved by argument. In each claim it is assumed that the parties to the disagreement are rational. I argue that both claims are false. The first fails to take account of refutations. The second fails to recognise the role of conjectures in the dynamics of the growth of knowledge. There is no disagreement such that it is impossible for (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. The Carneades Argumentation Framework: Using Presumptions and Exceptions to Model Critical Questions.Douglas Walton with Chris Reed - manuscript
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Relevance in the Law: A Logical Perspective.Author unknown - manuscript
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Visualization Tools, Argumentation Schemes and Expert Opinion Evidence in Law.Douglas Walton - manuscript
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  7. Examination Dialogue: An Argumentation Framework for Critically Questioning an Expert Opinion.Douglas Walton - manuscript
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  8. Common Knowledge in Argumentation.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - manuscript
    Studies in Communication Sciences, 6, 2006, 3-26 . [link to online version posted].
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  9. Begging the Question is Not a Fallacy.John Woods - manuscript
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  10. Chapter XIII. Erotetic Reasoning.Anna Brożek - unknown - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 99:279-306.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Critical Thinking: A Guide to Evaluating Information. [REVIEW]Jim Gough - unknown - Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy 3.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Fallacy, What Fallacy? Theaetetus and the Instances of Knowledge.Fraser Landry - unknown - Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy 4.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Rhetoric of “Stakeholding.”.David M. Berube - forthcoming - Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Alban BOUVIER, L'argumentation Philosophique. Etude de Sociologie Cognitive.M. Bourdeau - forthcoming - Revue Internationale de Philosophie.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Argumentation: A New Paradigm?M. M. Carrilho - forthcoming - Revue Internationale de Philosophie.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. El Sector Informal.Jacques Charmes - forthcoming - Humanitas.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Descartes Et l'Argumentation Philosophique, Sous la Direction de Frederic Cossutta.E. Danblon - forthcoming - Revue Internationale de Philosophie.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Thinking & Reasoning.Michael E. Doherty - forthcoming - Thinking and Reasoning: Soucial Judgement Theory.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. On Systems of Rhetoric+ Reprinted From'philosophy and Rhetoric'vol 1, Issue 3, Pg 131-44, 1968.D. Ehninger - forthcoming - Philosophy and Rhetoric.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Feminist Philosophy and the Genetic Fallacy.Nancy Fraser - forthcoming - Hypatia.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. The Toulmin Brief.Emily Friedrich - forthcoming - Argumentation.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Toward a Feminist Poetic of Critical Thinking.James W. Garrison & A. Phelan - forthcoming - Philosophy of Education.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23. Forthcoming, Inquiry, Summer 2004.Darren Grant & Melayne Morgan McInnes - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Diálogos Na Dissertação Escolar: Um Estudo Sobre Os Enunciados de Senso Comum E de Polêmica/Dialogues at the Scholarly Argumentative Text: An Analysis of Consensual and Polemical Enunciates.Rinaldo Guariglia - forthcoming - Bakhtiniana.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Meta-Argumentation Modelling I: Methodology and Techniques.Dov Guido Boella, Leendert der Torre M. Gabbavany & Serena Villata - forthcoming - Studia Logica.
    In this paper, we introduce the methodology and techniques of meta-argumentation to model argumentation. The methodology of meta-argumentation instantiates Dung’s abstract argumentation theory with an extended argumentation theory, and is thus based on a combination of the methodology of instantiating abstract arguments, and the methodology of extending Dung’s basic argumentation frameworks with other relations among abstract arguments. The technique of meta-argumentation applies Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation to itself, by instantiating Dung’s abstract arguments with meta-arguments using a technique called flattening. (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Editorial: A Dialogue on Logic.Sven Ove Hansson - forthcoming - Theoria.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27. Feminist Perspectives on Argumentation.Catherine E. Hundleby - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Feminists note an association of arguing with aggression and masculinity and question the necessity of this connection. Arguing also seems to some to identify a central method of philosophical reasoning, and gendered assumptions and standards would pose problems for the discipline. Can feminine modes of reasoning provide an alternative or supplement? Can overarching epistemological standards account for the benefits of different approaches to arguing? These are some of the prospects for argumentation inside and outside of philosophy that feminists consider. -/- (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  28. The Recent Development of Informal Logic.Ralph H. Johnson & J. Anthony Blair - forthcoming - Informal Logic: The First International Symposium.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  29. The Nature and Classification of Fallacies.Howard Kahane - forthcoming - Informal Logic: The First International Symposium. Ca: Edgepress.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  30. Case-Based Reasoning and the Deep Structure Approach to Knowledge Representation, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference On.Andrej Kowalski - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Reflections on the Genetic Fallacy.Thelma Z. Lavine - forthcoming - Social Research: An International Quarterly.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  32. Persuasion by Our Art is Always Linked with Our Science—in the Exhaustiveness of Our Research.Yvonna S. Lincoln - forthcoming - Mind.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. Essentials of Dialogism: Aspects and Elements of a Dialogical Approach to Language.Per Linell - forthcoming - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34. Why Be Critical?(Or Rational or Moral?) On the Justification of Critical Thinking.Christine McCarthy - forthcoming - Philosophy of Education.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Critical Thinking Without Logic: Restoring Dignity to Information.John McPeck - forthcoming - Philosophy of Education.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. Persuasion and the Dependence Effect.Reese Miller - forthcoming - Business Ethics in Canada.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. Interface Rhetoric.Andrew Morrison & Even Westvang - forthcoming - Kairos.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Testing for Critical Thinking.H. Petrie - forthcoming - Philosophy of Education.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Formal and Informal Decision-Making at EU Level.Florin Popa - forthcoming - Cogito.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40. Some Antistrophes to The'rhetoric'+ Reprinted From'philosophy and Rhetoric'vol 1, Issue 3, Pg 145-64, 1968.R. Price - forthcoming - Philosophy and Rhetoric.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. New Perspectives in Dialogical Logic.Shahid Rahman - forthcoming - Synthese.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  42. O Ensino da Escrita Argumentativa Na Perspectiva Dialógica/The Teaching of Argumentative Writing in the Dialogic Perspective.Regina Braz da Silva Santos Rocha - forthcoming - Bakhtiniana.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. The Ancient Argumentative Game.S. Rubinelli - forthcoming - Topoi.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  44. The Philosophical and Pragmatic Significance of Informal Logic.Michael Scriven - forthcoming - Informal Logic: The First International Symposium.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  45. The 3rd Tokyo Conference on Argumentation.Takeshi Suzuki - forthcoming - Argumentation.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Teaching Visual Rhetoric.Caryn Talty - forthcoming - Kairos.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. Arguments That Aren't Arguments.in Contrast To - forthcoming - Informal Logic: The First International Symposium.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Pe'titio Principii and Argument Analysis.Douglas N. Walton - forthcoming - Informal Logic: The First International Symposium.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  49. What is Informal Logic.John Woods - forthcoming - Informal Logic: The First International Symposium.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  50. Courageous Arguments and Deep Disagreements.Andrew Aberdein - 2021 - Topoi 40 (5):1205-1212.
    Deep disagreements are characteristically resistant to rational resolution. This paper explores the contribution a virtue theoretic approach to argumentation can make towards settling the practical matter of what to do when confronted with apparent deep disagreement, with particular attention to the virtue of courage.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
1 — 50 / 5218