Results for 'Approach–avoid'

998 found
Order:
  1.  32
    Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks.R. Hans Phaf, Sören E. Mohr, Mark Rotteveel & Jelte M. Wicherts - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
  2.  33
    Approach–Avoidance Motivation and Emotion: Convergence and Divergence.Andrew J. Elliot, Andreas B. Eder & Eddie Harmon-Jones - 2013 - Emotion Review 5 (3):308-311.
    In this concluding piece, we identify and discuss various aspects of convergence and, to a lesser degree, divergence in the ideas expressed in the contributions to this special section. These contributions emphatically illustrate that approach–avoidance motivation is integral to the scientific study of emotion. It is our hope that the articles herein will facilitate cross-talk among researchers and research traditions, and will lead to a more thorough understanding of the role of approach–avoidance motivation in emotion.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  3.  26
    Approach–Avoidance versus Dominance–Submissiveness: A Multilevel Neural Framework on How Testosterone Promotes Social Status.David Terburg & Jack van Honk - 2013 - Emotion Review 5 (3):296-302.
    Approach–avoidance generally describes appetitive motivation and fear of punishment. In a social context approach motivation is, however, also expressed as social aggression and dominance. We therefore link approach–avoidance to dominance–submissiveness, and provide a neural framework that describes how the steroid hormone testosterone shifts reflexive as well as deliberate behaviors towards dominance and promotion of social status. Testosterone inhibits acute fear at the level of the basolateral amygdala and hypothalamus and promotes reactive dominance through upregulation of vasopressin gene expression in the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  38
    Training approach-avoidance of smiling faces affects emotional vulnerability in socially anxious individuals.Mike Rinck, Sibel Telli, Isabel L. Kampmann, Marcella L. Woud, Merel Kerstholt, Sarai te Velthuis, Matthias Wittkowski & Eni S. Becker - 2013 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.
  5.  25
    Approach/avoidance in dreams.Susan Malcolm-Smith, Sheri Koopowitz, Eleni Pantelis & Mark Solms - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):408-412.
    The influential threat simulation theory asserts that dreaming yields adaptive advantage by providing a virtual environment in which threat-avoidance may be safely rehearsed. We have previously found the incidence of biologically threatening dreams to be around 20%, with successful threat avoidance occurring in approximately one-fifth of such dreams. TST asserts that threat avoidance is over-represented relative to other possible dream contents. To begin assessing this issue, we contrasted the incidence of ‘avoidance’ dreams with that of their opposite: ‘approach’ dreams. Because (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  6
    Approach-avoidance in an ambivalent object discrimination problem.Robert Thompson - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (5):341.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  17
    Approach-avoidance: Potency in psychological research.John B. Gormly & Anne V. Gormly - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 17 (5):221-223.
    Women heard another person state attitudes that were either in high agreement or high disagreement with their own attitudes. The potency of an approach-avoidance dependent variable was compared with traditional dependent variables for this situation, ratings of inter-personal attraction. Eighty-five percent of those hearing high agreement volunteered to return to the laboratory to continue participation in the study at a later time. Nobody who heard high disagreement volunteered to return. This difference between the two treatment conditions was considerably greater than (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  23
    Implicit approach–avoidance associations for craved food cues.Eva Kemps, Marika Tiggemann, Rachel Martin & Mecia Elliott - 2013 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 19 (1):30.
  9.  14
    Agency influences vicarious approach/avoidance effects.Cristina Zogmaister, Michela Vezzoli, Karoline Bading & Marco Perugini - 2023 - Cognition and Emotion 37 (8):1299-1314.
    Social learning plays a prominent role in shaping individual preferences. The vicarious approach-avoidance effect consists of developing a preference for attitudinal objects that have been approached over objects that have been avoided by another person (model). In two experiments (N = 448 participants), we explored how the vicarious approach-avoidance effect is affected by agency (model’s voluntary choice) and identification with the model. The results consistently revealed vicarious approach-avoidance effects in preference, as indicated by the semantic differential and the Implicit Association (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  18
    Approach-avoidance activation without anterior asymmetry.Andero Uusberg, Helen Uibo, Riti Tiimus, Helena Sarapuu, Kairi Kreegipuu & Jüri Allik - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  16
    The contextual malleability of approach-avoidance training effects: approaching or avoiding fear conditioned stimuli modulates effects of approach-avoidance training.Gaëtan Mertens, Pieter Van Dessel & Jan De Houwer - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (2):341-349.
    Previous research showed that the repeated approaching of one stimulus and avoiding of another stimulus typically leads to more positive evaluations of the former stimuli. In the current study, we examined whether approach and avoidance training effects on evaluations of neutral stimuli can be modulated by introducing a regularity between the approach-avoidance actions and a positive or negative stimulus. In an AAT task, participants repeatedly approached one neutral non-word and avoided another neutral non-word. Half of the participants also approached a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  12.  42
    Comparing measures of approach–avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task.Regina Krieglmeyer & Roland Deutsch - 2010 - Cognition and Emotion 24 (5):810-828.
  13.  14
    We like it ‘cause you take it: vicarious effects of approach/avoidance behaviours on observers.Cristina Zogmaister, Sabrina Brignoli, Arianna Martellone, Daiana Tuta & Marco Perugini - 2023 - Cognition and Emotion 37 (1):62-85.
    We present five studies investigating the effects of approach and avoidance behaviours when individuals do not enact them but, instead, learn that others have performed them. In Experiment 1, when participants read that a fictitious character (model) had approached a previously unknown product, they ascribed to this model a liking for the object. In contrast, they ascribed to the model a disliking for the avoided product. In Experiment 2, this result emerged, with a smaller effect size, even when it was (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  14.  15
    Motivational effects in approach-avoidance conflict.R. A. Champion - 1961 - Psychological Review 68 (5):354-358.
  15.  4
    Facial coloration influences social approach-avoidance through social perception.Christopher A. Thorstenson & Adam D. Pazda - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion:1-16.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  16.  19
    Net approach gradient in approach-avoidance conflict.James G. Martin, Eveline M. Loewe, Allan E. Hinkle & Marilyn L. Fitzgerald - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (5):520.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  26
    Regulating cognitive control through approach-avoidance motor actions.Severine Koch, Rob W. Holland & Ad van Knippenberg - 2008 - Cognition 109 (1):133-142.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  18.  17
    Factors in the recovery from approach-avoidance conflict.Mitchell M. Berkun - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (1):65.
  19.  16
    Defensive burying and approach-avoidance behavior in the rat.John P. J. Pinel, Emelie Hoyer & L. J. Terlecki - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 16 (5):349-352.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  20.  17
    The resolution of approach-avoidance conflict: II. Continuous response measures.Donald R. Yelen - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (4):391-393.
  21.  10
    Startle is modulated by approach/avoidance rather than valence stimuli.Boyall Sarah, Camfield David & Croft Rodney - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
  22.  19
    Let Me Make You Happy, and I'll Tell You How You Look Around: Using an Approach-Avoidance Task as an Embodied Emotion Prime in a Free-Viewing Task.Artur Czeszumski, Friederike Albers, Sven Walter & Peter König - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
    The embodied approach of human cognition suggests that concepts are deeply dependent upon and constrained by an agent's physical body's characteristics, such as performed body movements. In this study, we attempted to broaden previous research on emotional priming, investigating the interaction of emotions and visual exploration. We used the joystick-based approach-avoidance task to influence the emotional states of participants, and subsequently, we presented pictures of news web pages on a computer screen and measured participant's eye movements. As a result, the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23.  6
    Further comment on approach-avoidance as categories of response.Henry W. Nissen - 1952 - Psychological Review 59 (2):161-167.
  24.  22
    Looking into your eyes: observed pupil size influences approach-avoidance responses.Marco Brambilla, Marco Biella & Mariska E. Kret - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (3):616-622.
    ABSTRACTThe eyes reveal important social messages, such as emotions and whether a person is aroused and interested or bored and fatigued. A growing body of research has also shown that individuals with large pupils are generally evaluated positively by observers, while those with small pupils are perceived negatively. Here, we examined whether observed pupil size influences approach-avoidance tendencies. Participants performed an Approach-Avoidance Task using faces with large and small pupil sizes. Results showed that pupil size influences the accuracy of arm (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  25.  5
    Mindfulness and equanimity moderate approach/avoidance motor responses.Catherine Juneau, Rebecca Shankland, Bärbel Knäuper & Michaël Dambrun - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion:1-14.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  9
    The influence of memory for impressions based on behaviours and beliefs on approach/avoidance decisions.A. M. Sklenar, A. N. Frankenstein, P. Urban Levy & E. D. Leshikar - 2022 - Cognition and Emotion 36 (8):1491-1508.
    Recent work has shown that memory for various types of information associated with social targets (impressions based on behaviours and political ideology) influences decisions to approach or avoid those same targets. The current study was intended to better understand the extent that memory for other types of details associated with targets (beliefs and behaviours) affects subsequent approach/avoidance decisions. In this investigation, participants formed impressions of social targets represented by a picture and a sentence (a belief in Experiment 1; either a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  38
    On the Nature of Automatically Triggered Approach–Avoidance Behavior.Regina Krieglmeyer, Jan De Houwer & Roland Deutsch - 2013 - Emotion Review 5 (3):280-284.
    Theory suggests that stimulus evaluations automatically evoke approach–avoidance behavior. However, the extent to which approach–avoidance behavior is triggered automatically is not yet clear. Furthermore, the nature of automatically triggered approach–avoidance behavior is controversial. We review research on two views on the type of approach–avoidance behavior that is triggered automatically (arm flexion/extension, distance change). Present evidence supports the distance-change view and corroborates the notion of an automatic pathway from evaluation to distance-change behavior. We discuss underlying mechanisms (direct stimulus–response links, outcome anticipations, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  28.  15
    Failures to induce implicit evaluations by means of approach–avoid training.Katrien Vandenbosch & Jan De Houwer - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (7):1311-1330.
    Woud, Becker, and Rinck (2008) asked participants to repeatedly push pictures of certain faces away and to pull pictures of other faces towards them using a joystick. Performance in a subsequent affective priming task showed that previously pulled faces evoked more positive implicit evaluations then previously pushed faces. We report five studies in which we failed to find consistent evidence for the effect of approach–avoid training on implicit evaluations. We also failed to reproduce the effect reported by Woud et (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  29.  5
    Social Message Account or Processing Conflict Account – Which Processes Trigger Approach/Avoidance Reaction to Emotional Expressions of In- and Out-Group Members?Dirk Wentura & Andrea Paulus - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13:885668.
    Faces are characterized by the simultaneous presence of several evaluation-relevant features, for example, emotional expression and (prejudiced) ethnicity. The social message account (SMA) hypothesizes the immediate integration of emotion and ethnicity. According to SMA, happy in-group faces should be interpreted as benevolent, whereas happy out-group faces should be interpreted as potentially malevolent. By contrast, fearful in-group faces should be interpreted as signaling an unsafe environment, whereas fearful out-group faces should be interpreted as signaling inferiority. In contrast, the processing conflict account (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  24
    Motivation and the three-function learning: Food deprivation and approach-avoidance to food words.Arthur W. Staats & Don R. Warren - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1191.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  31.  20
    A Bayesian hierarchical diffusion model decomposition of performance in Approach–Avoidance Tasks.Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos, Tom Beckers, Merel Kindt & Eric-Jan Wagenmakers - 2015 - Cognition and Emotion 29 (8):1424-1444.
    Common methods for analysing response time (RT) tasks, frequently used across different disciplines of psychology, suffer from a number of limitations such as the failure to directly measure the underlying latent processes of interest and the inability to take into account the uncertainty associated with each individual's point estimate of performance. Here, we discuss a Bayesian hierarchical diffusion model and apply it to RT data. This model allows researchers to decompose performance into meaningful psychological processes and to account optimally for (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32.  19
    The processing of task-irrelevant emotion and colour in the Approach-Avoidance Task.Xijia Luo, Mike Rinck, Harold Bekkering & Eni S. Becker - 2019 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (3):548-562.
    ABSTRACTWhen processing information about human faces, we have to integrate different sources of information like skin colour and emotional expression. In 3 experiments, we investigated how these features are processed in a top-down manner when task instructions determine the relevance of features, and in a bottom-up manner when the stimulus features themselves determine process priority. In Experiment 1, participants learned to respond with approach-avoidance movements to faces that presented both emotion and colour features. For each participant, only one of these (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  18
    Inhibition, reacquisition, and extinction of approach in rats following frustrative nonreward and approach-avoidance conflict.M. G. King - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (3):360.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  15
    From perception to preference and on to inference: An approach–avoidance analysis of thresholds.Shenghua Luan, Lael J. Schooler & Gerd Gigerenzer - 2014 - Psychological Review 121 (3):501-525.
  35.  17
    The influence of pre-training evaluative responses on approach-avoidance training outcomes.Anand Krishna & Andreas B. Eder - 2019 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (7):1410-1423.
    ABSTRACTApproach-avoidance training has been shown to be effective in both clinical and laboratory research. However, some studies have failed to show the effects of AAT. Therefore, finding m...
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  11
    Emotional valence and contextual affordances flexibly shape approach-avoidance movements.Ana Carolina Saraiva, Friederike Schüür & Sven Bestmann - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychology 4.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  37.  43
    Approach and Avoidance Behaviour: Multiple Systems and their Interactions.Philip J. Corr - 2013 - Emotion Review 5 (3):285-290.
    Approach–avoidance theories describe the major systems that motivate behaviours in reaction to classes of appetitive (rewarding) and aversive (punishing) stimuli. The literature points to two major “avoidance” systems, one related to pure avoidance and escape of aversive stimuli, and a second, to behavioural inhibition induced by the detection of goal conflict (in addition, there is evidence for nonaffective behavioural constraint). A third major system, responsible for approach behaviour, is reactive to appetitive stimuli, and has several subcomponents. A number of combined (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  38.  14
    Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: on the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses.Julia Kozlik, Roland Neumann & Ljubica Lozo - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  39.  22
    Commentary: Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: on the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses.Andreas B. Eder, Klaus Rothermund & Bernhard Hommel - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
  40.  7
    Focus meets motivation: When regulatory focus aligns with approach/avoidance motivation in creative processes.Christina Mühlberger, Paul Endrejat, Julius Möller, Daniel Herrmann, Simone Kauffeld & Eva Jonas - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    According to Regulatory Focus Theory, two systems determine our strategies to pursue goals – the promotion and the prevention system. Individuals with a dominant promotion system focus on achieving gains, i.e., promoters, and individuals with a dominant prevention system focus on avoiding losses, i.e., preventers. Regulatory Fit Theory suggests that a fit between this focus and the situation causes superior performance and makes individuals feel right. We transfer the fit idea to the interaction of dominant regulatory focus with motivational direction. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  18
    Induction of implicit evaluation biases by approach–avoidance training: A commentary on Vandenbosch and De Houwer.Marcella L. Woud, Eni S. Becker & Mike Rinck - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (7):1331-1338.
  42.  32
    Approach and Avoidance as Organizing Structures for Motivated Distance Perception.Emily Balcetis - 2016 - Emotion Review 8 (2):115-128.
    Emerging demonstrations of the malleability of distance perception in affective situations require an organizing structure. These effects can be predicted by approach and avoidance orientation. Approach reduces perceptions of distance; avoidance exaggerates perceptions of distance. Moreover, hedonic valence, motivational intensity, and perceiver arousal cannot alone serve as organizing principles. Organizing the literature based on approach and avoidance can reconcile seeming inconsistent effects in the literature, and offers these motives as psychological mechanisms by which affective situations predict perceptions of distance. Moreover, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  43.  7
    An analysis of awe evoked by COVID-19 on green purchasing behavior: A dual-path effect of approach-avoidance motivation.Weihuan Su, Xixiang Sun, Xiaodong Guo, Wei Zhang & Gen Li - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    The spread of the COVID-19 virus shows that it is time to re-emphasize the ethical attitude of “awe of others, awe of nature, and awe of life.” It once again reveals the importance of green development. In this study, we introduce awe into the context of COVID-19 and construct an “emotion-motivation-behavior” framework, aiming to explore the relationship between the epidemic and green purchasing behavior from a psychological perspective. Study 1 demonstrates the effect of awe on green purchasing and examines the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  20
    Displacement: greater generalization of approach than avoidance in a generalized approach-avoidance conflict.Neal E. Miller & Doris Kraeling - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (3):217.
  45.  14
    A Quantitative Relationship between Signal Detection in Attention and Approach/Avoidance Behavior.Vijay Viswanathan, John P. Sheppard, Byoung W. Kim, Christopher L. Plantz, Hao Ying, Myung J. Lee, Kalyan Raman, Frank J. Mulhern, Martin P. Block, Bobby Calder, Sang Lee, Dale T. Mortensen, Anne J. Blood & Hans C. Breiter - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  13
    Effects of facial expression and gaze direction on approach–avoidance behaviour.Hiroki Ozono, Motoki Watabe & Sakiko Yoshikawa - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (5):943-949.
  47.  26
    The potential role of temporal dynamics in approach biases: delay-dependence of a general approach bias in an alcohol approach-avoidance task.Thomas E. Gladwin, Sören E. Mohr & Reinout W. Wiers - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  12
    “Science Manipulates the Things and Lives in Them”: Reconsidering Approach-Avoidance Operationalization Through a Grounded Cognition Perspective.Ivane Nuel, Marie-Pierre Fayant & Theodore Alexopoulos - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  10
    Children are more exploratory and learn more than adults in an approach-avoid task.Emily G. Liquin & Alison Gopnik - 2022 - Cognition 218 (C):104940.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  12
    Self-restraint: A type of self-control in an approach-avoidance situation.Sumio Imada & Hiroshi Imada - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (4):687-688.
1 — 50 / 998