29 found
Order:
  1.  44
    “I feel better but I don't know why”: The psychology of implicit emotion regulation.Sander L. Koole & Klaus Rothermund - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (3):389-399.
  2.  39
    Why a standard IAT effect cannot provide evidence for association formation: the role of similarity construction.Karoline Bading, Christoph Stahl & Klaus Rothermund - 2020 - Cognition and Emotion 34 (1):128-143.
    ABSTRACTMoran and Bar-Anan. The effect of object-valence relations on automatic evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 743–752) demonstrated that evaluations on...
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3.  25
    Attending to emotional expressions: no evidence for automatic capture in the dot-probe task.Swantje Puls & Klaus Rothermund - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (3):450-463.
    Research on automatic attention to emotional faces offers mixed results. Therefore we examined validity effects for facial expressions of different emotions with a dot-probe paradigm in seven studies. Systematic variations of type of emotion, CTI, task, cue size, and masking allow for a differentiated assessment of attentional capture by emotions and possible moderating factors. Results indicate a general absence of emotional validity effects as well as a lack of significant interactions with either of the manipulated factors, indicating that facial expressions (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  4.  20
    Counter-regulation triggered by emotions: Positive/negative affective states elicit opposite valence biases in affective processing.Susanne Schwager & Klaus Rothermund - 2013 - Cognition and Emotion 27 (5):839-855.
  5.  28
    Incongruency effects in affective processing: Automatic motivational counter-regulation or mismatch-induced salience?Klaus Rothermund, Anne Gast & Dirk Wentura - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (3):413-425.
    Attention is automatically allocated to stimuli that are opposite in valence to the current motivational focus (Rothermund, 2003; Rothermund, Voss, & Wentura, 2008). We tested whether this incongruency effect is due to affective–motivational counter-regulation or to an increased salience of stimuli that mismatch with cognitively activated information. Affective processing biases were assessed with a search task in which participants had to detect the spatial position at which a positive or negative stimulus was presented. In the motivational condition, positive or negative (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  6.  39
    Cognitive processes in associative and categorical priming: A diffusion model analysis.Andreas Voss, Klaus Rothermund, Anne Gast & Dirk Wentura - 2013 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142 (2):536.
  7.  46
    Affective priming of semantic categorisation responses.Jan De Houwer, Dirk Hermans, Klaus Rothermund & Dirk Wentura - 2002 - Cognition and Emotion 16 (5):643-666.
  8.  12
    Predicting Behavior With Implicit Measures: Disillusioning Findings, Reasonable Explanations, and Sophisticated Solutions.Franziska Meissner, Laura Anne Grigutsch, Nicolas Koranyi, Florian Müller & Klaus Rothermund - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Two decades ago, the introduction of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) sparked enthusiastic reactions. With implicit measures like the IAT, researchers hoped to finally be able to bridge the gap between self-reported attitudes on one hand and behavior on the other. Twenty years of research and several meta-analyses later, however, we have to conclude that neither the IAT nor its derivatives have fulfilled these expectations. Their predictive value for behavioral criteria is weak and their incremental validity over and above self-report (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  9.  10
    The Propositional Evaluation Paradigm: Indirect Assessment of Personal Beliefs and Attitudes.Florian Müller & Klaus Rothermund - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Identification of propositions as the core of attitudes and beliefs (De Houwer, 2014) has resulted in the development of implicit measures targeting personal evaluations of complex sentences (e.g., the IRAP or the RRT). Whereas their utility is uncontested, these paradigms are subject to limitations inherent in their block based design, such as allowing assessment of only a single belief at a time. We introduce the Propositional Evaluation Paradigm (PEP) for assessment of multiple propositional beliefs within a single experimental block. Two (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  10.  18
    On the dynamics of implicit emotion regulation: Counter-regulation after remembering events of high but not of low emotional intensity.Susanne Schwager & Klaus Rothermund - 2014 - Cognition and Emotion 28 (6):971-992.
  11. Antecedents and Consequences of Endorsing Prescriptive Views of Active Aging and Altruistic Disengagement.M. Clara de Paula Couto, Helene H. Fung, Sylvie Graf, Thomas M. Hess, Shyhnan Liou, Jana Nikitin & Klaus Rothermund - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    In this study, we investigated endorsement of two types of prescriptive views of aging, namely active aging and altruistic disengagement. The study comprised a large international sample of middle-aged and older adults, covering the age range from 40 to 90 years. Participants rated their personal endorsement of prescriptive views of active aging and altruistic disengagement targeting older adults in general. Findings showed that endorsement was higher for prescriptions for active aging than for prescriptions for altruistic disengagement. Age groups in the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  13
    Rethinking emotion science: new theory section for Cognition & Emotion.Klaus Rothermund & Sander L. Koole - 2020 - Cognition and Emotion 34 (4):628-632.
    A cumulative emotion science requires sustained investments in theory development. To encourage such investments, a new section will be added to Cognition & Emotion that is specifically devoted to...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  13. The “meddling-in” of affective information: A general model of automatic evaluation effects.Dirk Wentura & Klaus Rothermund - 2003 - In Jochen Musch & Karl C. Klauer (eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion. Lawerence Erlbaum. pp. 51--86.
  14.  20
    What you see is what will change: Evaluative conditioning effects depend on a focus on valence.Anne Gast & Klaus Rothermund - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (1):89-110.
  15.  24
    Attention please: No affective priming effects in a valent/neutral-categorisation task.Benedikt Werner & Klaus Rothermund - 2013 - Cognition and Emotion 27 (1):119-132.
    Affective congruency effects in the evaluation task can be explained by either spreading of activation or response competition. Eliminating effects of response compatibility by using other tasks (semantic categorisation, naming task) typically also eliminates affective congruency effects. However, there is no need for processing the affective information of the stimuli in these tasks either, which could be necessary for an affectively mediated spreading of activation (Spruyt et al., 2007, 2009, 2012). We introduced a new task to further test this hypothesis. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  16.  7
    Automatic processes in evaluative learning.Mandy Hütter & Klaus Rothermund - 2020 - Cognition and Emotion 34 (1):1-20.
  17.  26
    Three decades of Cognition & Emotion: A brief review of past highlights and future prospects.Klaus Rothermund & Sander L. Koole - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (1):1-12.
  18.  17
    Resilience is more about being flexible than about staying positive.Sander L. Koole, Susanne Schwager & Klaus Rothermund - 2015 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38:e109.
    Kalisch et al. propose a positive appraisal style as the key mechanism that underlies resilience. The present authors suggest that flexibility in emotion processing is more conducive to resilience than a general positivity bias. People may achieve emotional flexibility through counter-regulation – a dynamic processing bias toward positive stimuli in negative contexts and negative stimuli in positive contexts.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  19.  35
    Revisiting the past and back to the future: Horizons of cognition and emotion research.Sander L. Koole & Klaus Rothermund - 2019 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (1):1-7.
    ABSTRACTTo commemorate that Cognition & Emotion was established three decades ago, we asked some distinguished scholars to reflect on past research on the interface of cognition and emotion and prospects for the future. The resulting papers form the Special Issue on Horizons in Cognition and Emotion Research. The contributions to Horizons cover both the field in general and a diversity of specific topics, including affective neuroscience, appraisal theory, automatic evaluation, embodied emotion, emotional disorders, emotion-linked attentional bias, emotion recognition, emotion regulation, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  20.  16
    Automatic attention to stimuli signalling chances and dangers: Moderating effects of positive and negative goal and action contexts.Klaus Rothermund, Dirk Wentura & Peter M. Bak - 2001 - Cognition and Emotion 15 (2):231-248.
  21.  22
    Commentary: Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: on the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses.Andreas B. Eder, Klaus Rothermund & Bernhard Hommel - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
  22.  27
    Affective matching moderates S–R binding.Carina Giesen & Klaus Rothermund - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (2):342-350.
  23.  30
    Automatic influence of arousal information on evaluative processing: Valence–arousal interactions in an affective Simon task.Andreas B. Eder & Klaus Rothermund - 2010 - Cognition and Emotion 24 (6):1053-1061.
  24.  9
    Intimacy Effects on Action Regulation: Retrieval of Observationally Acquired Stimulus–Response Bindings in Romantically Involved Interaction Partners Versus Strangers.Carina Giesen, Virginia Löhl, Klaus Rothermund & Nicolas Koranyi - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  25. Age Specificity in Explicit and Implicit Endorsement of Prescriptive Age Stereotypes.M. Clara de Paula Couto, Tingting Huang & Klaus Rothermund - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    In this study, we investigated explicit and implicit endorsement of prescriptive age stereotypes. To achieve that, we captured endorsement of a wide range of prescriptive expectations targeting both younger and older people. Younger and older adults participated in the study. We assessed implicit endorsement of prescriptive age stereotypes with the Propositional Evaluation Paradigm and used a direct measure to assess explicit endorsement. In general, we found strong support for age-specificity in both explicit and implicit endorsement of prescriptive age stereotypes: Sentences (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  19
    Affective priming in the valent/neutral categorisation task is due to affective matching, not encoding facilitation: Reply to Spruyt.Klaus Rothermund & Benedikt Werner - 2014 - Cognition and Emotion 28 (3):570-576.
    Spruyt obtained an affective congruency effect in a valent/neutral categorisation task, which contrasts with the absence of such an effect in the same task that was reported by Werner and Rothermund. The crucial difference between the two studies is that Spruyt presented only valent primes, whereas Werner and Rothermund presented equal amounts of valent and neutral primes and targets in their experiments. Removing the neutral primes introduces a confound of affective matches with the required response. Affective congruency effects in Spruyt's (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27.  4
    Coping with COVID-19: Insights from cognition and emotion research.Sander L. Koole & Klaus Rothermund - 2022 - Cognition and Emotion 36 (1):1-8.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  22
    Does sunshine prime loyal … or summer? Effects of associative relatedness on the evaluative priming effect in the valent/neutral categorisation task.Benedikt Werner, Elisabeth von Ramin, Adriaan Spruyt & Klaus Rothermund - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (1):222-230.
    After 30 years of research, the mechanisms underlying the evaluative priming effect are still a topic of debate. In this study, we tested whether the evaluative priming effect can result from associative relatedness rather than evaluative congruency. Stimuli that share the same evaluative connotation are more likely to show some degree of non-evaluative associative relatedness than stimuli that have a different evaluative connotation. Therefore, unless associative relatedness is explicitly controlled for, evaluative priming effects reported in earlier research may be driven (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  8
    Affect dynamics and well-being: explanatory power of the model of intraindividual variability in affect.Maria Wirth, Andreas Voss, Stefan Wirth & Klaus Rothermund - 2022 - Cognition and Emotion 36 (2):188-210.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark