Trust is indispensable not only for interpersonal relationships and social life, but for good quality healthcare. As manifested in the increasing violence and tension in patient-physician relationships, China has been experiencing a widespread and profound crisis of patient–physician trust. And globally, the crisis of trust is an issue that every society, either developing or developed, has to face in one way or another. Yet, in spite of some pioneering works, the subject of patient-physician trust and mistrust – a crucial matter (...) in healthcare especially because there are numerous ethical implications – has largely been marginalized in bioethics as a global discourse. Drawing lessons as well as inspirations from China, this paper demonstrates the necessity of a trust-oriented bioethics and presents some key theoretical, methodological and philosophical elements of such a bioethics. A trust-oriented bioethics moves beyond the current dominant bioethical paradigms through putting the subject of trust and mistrust in the central agenda of the field, learning from the social sciences, and reviving indigenous moral resources. In order for global bioethics to claim its relevance to the things that truly matter in social life and healthcare, trust should be as vital as such central norms like autonomy and justice and can serve as a potent theoretical framework. (shrink)

本书针对传统哲学教科书理论体系的缺陷,对马克思精神生产理论产生的理论来源、现实基础、思想进程、逻辑发展及其在马克思主义哲学理论体系中的重要地位进行了论述等。.

本书包括:科学技术与伦理学,科学共同体的伦理规范和科学家的社会责任,科技立法与道德教育等八章内容。.

ABSTRACT In a Buddhist treatise from around the fourth century CE there is a very remarkable story which serves as a thought experiment calling us to question the nature of self and the identity of persons. Lost in Sanskrit, the passage is fortunately preserved in a Chinese translation, the Dà zhìdù lùn. We here present the first reliable translation directly from the Classical Chinese, and discuss the philosophical significance of the story in its historical and literary context. We emphasise the (...) philosophical importance of embedding the story in two framing narratives, and demonstrate that the story taps a range of intuitions, and indeed fears, about the survival of the self which have also played a large role in the history of the topic in the West, and which continue to be of great contemporary concern. (shrink)

本书对处于社会转型期中国的审美文化特性以及其中出现的种种让人困惑的问题,从不同角度、不同层面作了阐述。.

本书不仅从理论和现实、宏观与微观等方面,对信仰问题进行了多维度、多层面的研究和探索,从而在理论上系统地呈现了信仰本质论、信仰类型论、信仰机制论等信仰理论扇面,而且还从方法论上探讨了信仰的研究视野、框架 和方法,从学科建构上开启了马克思主义信仰学的构建等。.

Research on Hegel's Phenomenology of mind.

本书分为理论探索、个案解读、研究生审美文化论坛三部分。收录的文章有:《文艺美学新形态——审美文化研究及其人文品位》、《略谈当代审美文化的“审美”内涵》、《论审美活动的学术定位——从“社会个体生成论”看 美学的研究对象》、《论审美抽象》等。.

本书主要内容有知识与智慧:教育的性格、知识与智慧:教育的历史、知识与智慧:教育的型态等。.

Ben shu gong fen san bu: di yi bu hui gui zhen wo, di er bu hui gui tian di, di san bu hui gui tai ji. Nei rong bao kuo: lun sheng ming; sheng ming yu shi ge; sheng ming yu yin yue; xian dai ren sheng ming de yan bian; wo shi shui, tian di yu wo deng.

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Reviewed by:Philosophical Enactment and Bodily Cultivation in Early Daoism: In the Matrix of the Daodejing by Thomas MichaelJing Tan (bio) and Xiangfei Bao (bio)Philosophical Enactment and Bodily Cultivation in Early Daoism: In the Matrix of the Daodejing. By Thomas Michael. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022. Pp. x + 278. Hardcover $115.00, isbn 978-1-3502-3665-3. Thomas Michael's Philosophical Enactment and Bodily Cultivation in Early Daoism: In the Matrix of the Daodejing (hereafter (...) Philosophical Enactment) brings forward new perspectives and pathways to one of the most important topics concerning the reconstruction of early Daoist history. The author has contributed two other original and insightful monographs to the study of Daoism, including In the Shadows of the Dao: Laozi, the Sage, and the Daodejing (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2015) and The Pristine Dao: Metaphysics in Early Daoist Discourse (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2005). Together with his newly published research article "The Original Text of the Daodejing: Disentangling Versions and Recensions" (Religions 13, No. 4, (2022): 325), Michael has displayed his erudition and expertise in the study of early Chinese religion and philosophy in both a sinological and philosophical way. His Philosophical Enactment sheds new light on the history of early Daoism. Writing the history of early Daoism is not easy, as Daoism is not ready-made and has no clear boundaries. The difficulty lies not only in its entanglement with, for instance, Confucianism and Legalism, but also in when Daoism began and how it transformed. Narrating the origin and the vicissitude of Daoism requires a prescribed narrative logic or a choice of philosophical paradigm. Piling up materials is not history writing. A typical pattern in writing the history of early Daoism is distinguishing the Daoist school of philosophy (daojia 道家) from Daoist religion (daojiao 道教).1 Indeed, this distinction brings much convenience to the history writing of Daoism and has been adopted by many scholars. Though some do not explicitly state this distinction, the structure of their writings indicates it.2 The distinction between daojia and daojiao was recognized by scholars long before Fung Yu-Lan 馮友蘭 (1895-1900) published his A Brief History of Chinese Philosophy in 1948. [End Page 1] Xu Dishan 許地山 (1893-1941) believes that such a distinction can be traced back to the "Three Ranks" (sanpin shuo三品說) in Liu Xie's 劉勰 (ca. 465-532) "On Eliminating Doubts" (Miehuo lun滅惑論).3However, the received distinction between daojia and daojiao is a retrospective one. It is the product of modern discipline classification and is based on the modern understanding of philosophy and religion. Such a distinction must have been unknown to the people before and during the Han. This distinction may also cause difficulties, for instance, how to classify Ge Hong 葛洪 (283-343) and his works. Wang Ka 王卡 (1956-2017) categorized Ge Hong as a Daoist philosopher,4 while Tang Yijie 湯一介 (1927-2014) assigns Ge Hong to Daoist religion. Tang even asserts that Ge Hong established a theoretical system for Daoist religion. 5 The practice of distinguishing and dichotomizing the Daoist school of philosophy and Daoist religion has been opposed by many researchers. The French Sinologist Henri Maspéro (1883-1945) argues that daojia and daojiao are not so distinct as is often received; they both belong to the same ancient tradition. Maspéro's opposition to the dichotomy was also supported by Joseph Needham (1900-1995), Kristof Schipper (1934-2021), and others.6Although many scholars find it difficult to sharply separate the Daoist school of philosophy from Daoist religion,7 and also find it improper to dichotomize these two concepts, they still commonly accept the distinction and then trying to bridge the two. However, the dilemma faced by scholars compels us to wonder about the appropriateness of the philosophical paradigm dictating this distinction. In other words, do we have a more appropriate alternative? Thomas Michael's Philosophical Enactment provides us with a new perspective for reconsidering the problem of the relationship between the Daoist school of philosophy and Daoist religion, while also being an excellent example of the history writing of early Daoism. According to the general view, the Daodejing belongs to Daoist philosophy because it offers systematic... (shrink)

本书作者通过“意思表示解释理论”的研究,试图表达于前人开辟的精神科学路径中寻找私法自治的哲学基础,以及构建融贯自治理念的私法理论的学术旨趣。.

本书内容包括:一般的法、直接源于政体性质的法律、三种政体原则的腐化、教育的法律应当与政体原则相适应、立法应当与政体原则相适应等。.

Ben shu shen ru tao lun lun li zai qi ye jing ying yu jing ji fa zhan zhong zhi gong neng.

本书共分十一章,内容包括:时代的挑战、历史之源、龙精凤魄、百年变迁、三十年探索、道德的困惑、龙与十字架、跨世纪的国魂、从私德到公德、走向新境界等。.

本书共七章,内容包括:舜帝与中华道德统绪,舜帝葬所与舜帝陵庙,舜帝陵祭祀与舜德传承,舜帝与礼乐文明,舜文化的阐释与演进等.

本书共七章,内容包括:舜帝与中华道德统绪,舜帝葬所与舜帝陵庙,舜帝陵祭祀与舜德传承,舜帝与礼乐文明,舜文化的阐释与演进等.

安徽省社科规划项目 安徽省教育厅人文社科基金项目 安徽师范大学科研出版基金 安徽省省级重点学科——安徽师范大学马克思主义哲学学科建设基金资助项目安徽省高校人文社科重点研究基地——安徽师范大学马克思主义研究中心研究基金资助项目.

本书介绍了经济伦理学的冲撞与整合、历史的探源、利己与利他、自律与他律、公平交易、公平分配等八章内容。.

本书收的是90年代特别是后半期的文章,分哲学、马克思主义与文化两部分,包括:《跨世纪的中国哲学走向》、《处在世纪转换中的马克思主义》等。.

本书由哲学和经济学各五篇文稿组成。包括:论系统论与马克思主义哲学的统一、哲学本体论的深层思考、论悟性认识及其在人类认识过程中的地位与作用、论人民币汇改的两难困境及其出路等。.

本书对《管子》的经济发展、经济调控、经济运行等方面的伦理思想进行了深入的探讨,并全面揭示了其宝贵的历史价值和深远的现代意义。.

內容簡介 儒學不應僅是「思辯哲學」或「實踐理論」。從「半日靜坐，半日讀書」到當代身體觀，透過理學工夫論研究，反思儒學進入現代西方學術之轉譯過程，所產生的實踐脫落，召喚逐漸被學院哲學遺忘的實踐向度。 本書是一部探討宋明理學工夫論的著作，雖概括不同時代理學家，但貫穿其間的是儒學作為「實踐之學」的基本信念。儒學現代化過程中，在學科分類下被勉強劃入「哲學」學門，但哲學家一向擅長以理論的方式探討實踐，卻往 往無法自己親自實踐。當代儒學也出現一個難題：學術化的儒家哲學如何「實踐」？如何不僅成為「思辯哲學」或「實踐理論」？如何避免「實踐的脫落」？此實是儒學現代化、學術化下的一項挑戰。 藉著回顧理學傳統的修養方法，尋找返本開新的可能。本書關注理學工夫的具體實踐與操作方法，如何被運作、展開；此訴求下，靜坐、讀書與與身體觀，是本書比較集中探討的理學工夫論面向。將工夫論研究，由思想文獻中靜 態結構描述的「實踐理論」，返回實修實證的動態歷程之展現。使儒家哲學研究從心性形上學，往身體向度落實，發展成完整的「身心之學」。 名人推薦 理學做為成德之學，向來與生命實踐密不可分。實踐工夫成為理學家日常性功課，甚至以證本體為生命大事，那種古典求道精神的實踐神聖性，在當今學術專技化的客觀年代，已逐漸成為一種實踐理論之客觀研究。而當存在體驗 化為抽象理論時，理學原初最濃厚的實踐動能與召喚力道，是否也將靈光消逝？本書作者的初發心，便具有這種存在的憂心與感受。換言之，身為現代的學者，作者仍懷有強烈的求道之古典關懷。本書的基本主題關涉：靜坐與讀 書這兩種工夫論的辯證，而除了心性修養的傳統論述以外，作者亦吸收當代的身體實踐觀點，企圖更為完整地描述理學家身心一體轉化的體證內涵。現今從事理學工夫理論的研究者不算少，但在理論與實踐之間尋尋覓覓者已不多 ，在這種儒門淡泊的工夫遺忘的現代氣氛下，作者的懷古初心尤為可貴，其研究成果也值得觀察。──賴錫三╱中山大學中文系教授 現代儒學研究，儒家的工夫論常被本體論取代，而呈失語現象。此書真正立基於工夫實踐的立場，可做為現今儒者內聖學道德實踐之重要參考著作。──廖俊裕╱南華大學生死學系副教授.

在世纪之交的重要历史时刻,我国学者聚会北京,深入探究科学精神。学者闪观点鲜明,思想犀利,讨论内容既涉入到中外科学精神的研究历史、现状,又函盖了科学精神的本质及弘扬科学精神的现实意义。这是我国自然科学和 社会科学界的知名学者第一次对科学精神进行科学的研究。.