Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: attention and memory in the classic selective listening procedure of Cherry (1953).Noelle L. Wood & Nelson Cowan - 1995 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124 (3):243.
  • Stroop effects for masked threat words: Pre-attentive bias or selective awareness?Jenny Wikström, Lars-Gunnar Lundh & Joakim Westerlund - 2003 - Cognition and Emotion 17 (6):827-842.
  • Theories and measurement of visual attentional processing in anxiety.Mariann R. Weierich, Teresa A. Treat & Andrew Hollingworth - 2008 - Cognition and Emotion 22 (6):985-1018.
  • Is the exogenous orienting of spatial attention truly automatic? Evidence from unimodal and multisensory studies.Valerio Santangelo & Charles Spence - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (3):989-1015.
    The last decade has seen great progress in the study of the nature of crossmodal links in exogenous and endogenous spatial attention . Exogenous spatial cuing studies of human crossmodal attention and multisensory integration. In C. Spence, & J. Driver , Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.], for a recent review). A growing body of research now highlights the existence of robust crossmodal links between auditory, visual, and tactile spatial attention. However, until recently, studies of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Wide eyes and an open mouth enhance facial threat.Jason Tipples - 2007 - Cognition and Emotion 21 (3):535-557.
  • The automatic access of emotion: Emotional Stroop effects in Spanish–English bilingual speakers.Tina M. Sutton, Jeanette Altarriba, Jennifer L. Gianico & Dana M. Basnight-Brown - 2007 - Cognition and Emotion 21 (5):1077-1090.
  • Attentional shifts to emotionally charged cues: Behavioural and erp data.Kjell Morten Stormark, Helge Nordby & Kenneth Hugdahl - 1995 - Cognition and Emotion 9 (5):507-523.
    When information activated in memory involves emotional associations, the ability to shift attention away from an emotional cue is impaired compared to an emotionally neutral cue. The purpose of the present study was to investigate how emotional stimuli modulate attentional processes, and how this is reflected in localised brain electrical activity. Eight emotion and eight neutral words served as cues in a covert attention spatial orienting task. The cues were either valid or invalid indicators of which hemifield the target would (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Richard M. Shiffrin & Walter Schneider - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (2):128-90.
    Tested the 2-process theory of detection, search, and attention presented by the current authors in a series of experiments. The studies demonstrate the qualitative difference between 2 modes of information processing: automatic detection and controlled search; trace the course of the learning of automatic detection, of categories, and of automatic-attention responses; and show the dependence of automatic detection on attending responses and demonstrate how such responses interrupt controlled processing and interfere with the focusing of attention. The learning of categories is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   800 citations  
  • An evaluation of early and late stage attentional processing of positive and negative information in dysphoria.Matthew S. Shane & Jordan B. Peterson - 2007 - Cognition and Emotion 21 (4):789-815.
  • Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Walter Schneider & Richard M. Shiffrin - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (1):1-66.
  • Brief report negative selectivity effects and emotional selectivity effects in anxiety: Differential attentional correlates of state and trait variables.Elizabeth Rutherford, Colin MacLeod & Lynlee Campbell - 2004 - Cognition and Emotion 18 (5):711-720.
  • From normal fear to pathological anxiety.Jeffrey B. Rosen & Jay Schulkin - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (2):325-350.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Memory-based attentional biases: Anxiety is linked to threat avoidance.Jean-Christophe Rohner - 2004 - Cognition and Emotion 18 (8):1027-1054.
  • Colour-identification of differentially valenced words in anxiety.Anne Richards & Bernice Millwood - 1989 - Cognition and Emotion 3 (2):171-176.
  • Information-processing predictors of emotional response to stress.Cynthia L. S. Pury - 2002 - Cognition and Emotion 16 (5):667-683.
  • The cognitive control of emotion.K. N. Ochsner & J. J. Gross - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (5):242-249.
    The capacity to control emotion is important for human adaptation. Questions about the neural bases of emotion regulation have recently taken on new importance, as functional imaging studies in humans have permitted direct investigation of control strategies that draw upon higher cognitive processes difficult to study in nonhumans. Such studies have examined (1) controlling attention to, and (2) cognitively changing the meaning of, emotionally evocative stimuli. These two forms of emotion regulation depend upon interactions between prefrontal and cingulate control systems (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   199 citations  
  • The naked truth: Positive, arousing distractors impair rapid target perception.Steven B. Most, Stephen D. Smith, Amy B. Cooter, Bethany N. Levy & David H. Zald - 2007 - Cognition and Emotion 21 (5):964-981.
  • Selective attention to threat: A test of two cognitive models of anxiety.Karin Mogg, James McNamara, Mark Powys, Hannah Rawlinson, Anna Seiffer & Brendan P. Bradley - 2000 - Cognition and Emotion 14 (3):375-399.
  • Assessment of cognitive bias in anxiety and depression using a colour perception task.Karin Mogg, Andrew Mathews, Jon May, Matthew Grove, Michael Eysenck & John Weinman - 1991 - Cognition and Emotion 5 (3):221-238.
  • Brief report time course of attentional bias for threat scenes: Testing the vigilance‐avoidance hypothesis.Karin Mogg, Brendan Bradley, Felicity Miles & Rachel Dixon - 2004 - Cognition and Emotion 18 (5):689-700.
  • Attentional bias to threat in clinical anxiety states.Karin Mogg, Andrew Mathews & Michael Eysenck - 1992 - Cognition and Emotion 6 (2):149-159.
  • Suppression of emotional stroop effects by fear-arousal.Andrew Mathews & Shannon Sebastian - 1993 - Cognition and Emotion 7 (6):517-530.
  • Processing of emotional meaning in anxiety.Andrew Mathews & Robert Milroy - 1994 - Cognition and Emotion 8 (6):535-553.
  • Induced processing biases have causal effects on anxiety.Andrew Mathews & Colin MacLeod - 2002 - Cognition and Emotion 16 (3):331-354.
  • Social Anxiety and Attention away from Emotional Faces.Warren Mansell, David M. Clark, Anke Ehlers & Yi-Ping Chen - 1999 - Cognition and Emotion 13 (6):673-690.
  • Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing.Michael S. Humphreys & William Revelle - 1984 - Psychological Review 91 (2):153-184.
  • Visual search for schematic affective faces: Stability and variability of search slopes with different instances.Gernot Horstmann - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (2):355-379.
    The threat-advantage hypothesis that threatening or negative faces can be discriminated preattentively has often been tested in the visual search paradigm with schematic stimuli. The results have been heterogeneous, suggesting that the choice of particular stimuli have profound effects on search efficiency. Because this conclusion is hampered by differences in experimental procedure, I selected examples from past literature and presented replicas of stimulus pairs (schematic positive and negative faces) in a within-participants design. Although there was a consistent advantage for angry-face (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The involvement of distinct visual channels in rapid attention towards fearful facial expressions.Amanda Holmes, Simon Green & Patrik Vuilleumier - 2005 - Cognition and Emotion 19 (6):899-922.
  • Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal.Daniel Holender - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (1):1-23.
    When the stored representation of the meaning of a stimulus is accessed through the processing of a sensory input it is maintained in an activated state for a certain amount of time that allows for further processing. This semantic activation is generally accompanied by conscious identification, which can be demonstrated by the ability of a person to perform discriminations on the basis of the meaning of the stimulus. The idea that a sensory input can give rise to semantic activation without (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   447 citations  
  • Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass.Arne Öhman, Anders Flykt & Francisco Esteves - 2001 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (3):466.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   217 citations  
  • Biases in Visual Attention in Depressed and Nondepressed Individuals.Ian H. Gotlib, Anne L. McLachlan & Albert N. Katz - 1988 - Cognition and Emotion 2 (3):185-200.
  • Attentional Biases for Facial Expressions in Social Phobia: The Face-in-the-Crowd Paradigm.Eva Gilboa-Schechtman, Edna B. Foa & Nader Amir - 1999 - Cognition and Emotion 13 (3):305-318.
  • Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently?Elaine Fox, Victoria Lester, Riccardo Russo, R. J. Bowles, Alessio Pichler & Kevin Dutton - 2000 - Cognition and Emotion 14 (1):61-92.
  • Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?Elaine Fox, Riccardo Russo, Robert Bowles & Kevin Dutton - 2001 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (4):681.
  • Allocation of visual attention and anxiety.Elaine Fox - 1993 - Cognition and Emotion 7 (2):207-215.
  • Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces.Elaine Fox, Riccardo Russo & Kevin Dutton - 2002 - Cognition and Emotion 16 (3):355-379.
  • Anxiety and Performance: The Processing Efficiency Theory.Michael W. Eysenck & Manuel G. Calvo - 1992 - Cognition and Emotion 6 (6):409-434.
  • Selective Processing of Threat Cues in Subjects with Panic Attacks.Anke Ehlers, Jürgen Margraf, Sylvia Davies & Walton T. Roth - 1988 - Cognition and Emotion 2 (3):201-219.
  • Processing of “unattended” threat-related information: Role of emotional content and context.Manuel G. Calvo, M. Dolores Castillo & Luis J. Fuentes - 2006 - Cognition and Emotion 20 (8):1049-1074.
  • Facilitated detection of angry faces: Initial orienting and processing efficiency.Manuel G. Calvo, Pedro Avero & Daniel Lundqvist - 2006 - Cognition and Emotion 20 (6):785-811.
  • Trait anxiety, anxious mood, and threat detection.Angela Byrne & Michael W. Eysenck - 1995 - Cognition and Emotion 9 (6):549-562.
  • Anxiety and Attentional Bias: State and Trait.Donald Broadbent & Margaret Broadbent - 1988 - Cognition and Emotion 2 (3):165-183.
  • Attentional biases for emotional faces.B. P. Bradley, K. Mogg, N. Millar, C. Bonham-Carter, E. Fergusson, J. Jenkins & M. Parr - 1997 - Cognition and Emotion 11 (1):25-42.
  • Attentional Bias for Threatening Facial Expressions in Anxiety: Manipulation of Stimulus Duration.Brendan P. Bradley, Karin Mogg, Sara J. Falla & Lucy R. Hamilton - 1998 - Cognition and Emotion 12 (6):737-753.
  • Attention and Effort.Daniel Kahneman - 1973 - Prentice-Hall.
  • Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology, and Ecology.Vicki Bruce & Patrick Green - 1985 - Lawerence Erlbaum.
    This comprehensively updated and expanded revision of the successful second edition continues to provide detailed coverage of the ever-growing range of research topics in vision. In Part I, the treatment of visual physiology has been extensively revised with an updated account of retinal processing, a new section explaining the principles of spatial and temporal filtering which underlie discussions in later chapters, and an up-to-date account of the primate visual pathway. Part II contains four largely new chapters which cover recent psychophysical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Attention and cognitive control.Michael I. Posner & C. R. R. Snyder - 1975 - In Robert L. Solso (ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • The four horsemen of automaticity: Intention, awareness, efficiency, and control as separate issues.J. A. Bargh - 1994 - In R. Wyer & T. Srull (eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 1--1.
  • The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition.John A. Bargh - 1994 - In R. Wyer & T. Srull (eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum.