1.  71
    Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass.Arne Öhman, Anders Flykt & Francisco Esteves - 2001 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (3):466.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   217 citations  
  2. Unconscious emotion: Evolutionary perspectives, psychophysiological data and neuropsychological mechanisms.Arne Öhman, Anders Flykt & Daniel Lundqvist - 2000 - In Richard D. R. Lane, L. Nadel & G. L. Ahern (eds.), Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion. Series in Affective Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 296-327.
  3.  27
    What determines a feeling's position in affective space? A case for appraisal.Klaus Scherer, Elise Dan & Anders Flykt - 2006 - Cognition and Emotion 20 (1):92-113.
    The location of verbally reported feelings in a three-dimensional affective space is determined by the results of appraisal processes that elicit the respective states. One group of participants rated their evaluation of 59 pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) on a profile of nine appraisal criteria. Another group rated their affective reactions to the same pictures on the classic dimensions of affective meaning (valence, arousal, potency). The ratings on the affect dimensions correlate differentially with specific appraisal ratings. These (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  4.  33
    Tracking fear in snake and spider fearful participants during visual search: A multi-response domain study.Anders Flykt & Roberto Caldara - 2006 - Cognition and Emotion 20 (8):1075-1091.
  5.  8
    The time course of resource allocation in spider-fearful participants during fear reactions.Anders Flykt & Anna Bjärtå - 2008 - Cognition and Emotion 22 (7):1381-1400.
    The dynamics of resource allocation to pictures of spiders and other animals in spider-fearful participants was investigated. The task of the participants was to respond rapidly and accurately to various probe stimuli superimposed on pictures of different animals. These were arguably fear relevant (spiders, snakes, and wolves) and fear irrelevant (beetles, turtles, and rabbits). The probes were shown with different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) from picture onset to address the dynamics of resource allocation. A larger allocation of resources to spider (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation