Results for 'Pereboom, Derk'

(not author) ( search as author name )
351 found
Order:
  1.  22
    Robert Kane, the significance of free will.Reviewed by Derk Pereboom - 2000 - Ethics 110 (2).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Four Views on Free Will.John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane & Derk Pereboom Y. Manuel Vargas - 2007 - Critica 39 (117):96-109.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   76 citations  
  3.  28
    Pereboom, Derk, Free Will, Agency, and Meaning In Life: New York, U.S.A.: Oxford, 2014, ISBN 978-0199685516 $40.50 hb.Shane J. George - 2016 - Journal of Value Inquiry 50 (1):255-259.
  4.  13
    Derk Pereboom, Wrongdoing & the Human Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press. 224pp. ISBN: 978-0198903789. US $25.00 (Pbk). [REVIEW]Stephen Kershnar - forthcoming - Journal of Value Inquiry.
    Derk Pereboom’s book, Wrongdoing & the Human Emotions, addresses how we ought to respond to wrongdoing given the lack of basic-desert moral responsibility, falsity of retributivism, and the metaphysical and moral problems with moral anger. The book is outstanding. Pereboom’s arguments are important, interesting, powerful, and very well-written. Despite this, his specific arguments fail because basic-desert responsibility-skepticism makes non-consequentialism is false.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Derk Pereboom, Free Will, Agency and Meaning in Life. [REVIEW]Sofia Jeppsson - 2018 - Utilitas 30 (2):241-244.
    Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency and Meaning in Life (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 219) follows quite closely in the steps of his Living Without Free Will (2001). Pereboom argues for “hard incompatibilism” in both – the thesis that regardless of whether determinism is true, the kind of free will required for desert-entailing moral responsibility is unlikely to exist. In Free Will…, however, he pays more attention to issues other than moral responsibility. This, I think, is a great (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Derk Pereboom, ed., Free Will Reviewed by.Clifford Williams - 1998 - Philosophy in Review 18 (4):240-242.
  7. An Evaluation of Derk Pereboom's Four-Case Argument.Mostofa N. Mansur - 2018 - Copula 35:16.
    Hard incompatibilism is a view which asserts that determinism and free will are inconsistent and given the facts of our best sciences determinism is true; and hence, free will does not exist. Not only that, it also claims that if the world were indeterministic and our actions were caused by states or events, still we would lack free will. In this way, it denies the truth of any libertarian account of free will based on event causation. In that sense, this (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Precis of Derk Perebooms Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life.Gregg D. Caruso - 2014 - Science Religion and Culture 1 (3):178-201.
    Derk Perebooms Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life (2014) provides the most lively and comprehensive defense of free will skepticism in the literature. It contains a reworked and expanded version of the view he first developed in Living without Free Will (2001). Important objections to the early book are answered, some slight modifications are introduced, and the overall account is significantly embellished—for example, Pereboom proposes a new account of rational deliberation consistent with the belief that one’s actions are (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  21
    A Defense of Derk Pereboom’s Containment Policy.Jeremy Scharoun & Neil Campbell - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (5):1291-1307.
    Derk Pereboom disagrees with P.F. Strawson that abandoning the reactive attitudes associated with praise and blame would come at the price of exiting our personal relationships. According to Pereboom, we can contain or modify our attitudes in ways that preserve, and perhaps even enrich interpersonal relationships. In a recent article, Seth Shabo defends “the inseparability thesis” in order to undermine Pereboom’s containment policy. Drawing on David Goldman’s work on non-antagonistic responses to wrongdoing, we defend Pereboom from Shabo’s critique.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  24
    Derk Pereboom, Consciousness and the Prospects of Physicalism. Reviewed by.Kevin Morris - 2012 - Philosophy in Review 32 (2):124-126.
  11. Précis of Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life.Gregg Caruso - 2014 - Science, Religion and Culture 1 (3):178-201.
    Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life provides the most lively and comprehensive defense of free will skepticism in the literature. It contains a reworked and expanded version of the view he first developed in Living without Free Will. Important objections to the early book are answered, some slight modifications are introduced, and the overall account is significantly embellished—for example, Pereboom proposes a new account of rational deliberation consistent with the belief that one’s actions are causally determined (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  12. Derk Pereboom, ed., Free Will. [REVIEW]Clifford Williams - 1998 - Philosophy in Review 18:240-242.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Hard Theological Determinism and the Illusion of Free Will: Sri Ramakrishna Meets Lord Kames, Saul Smilansky, and Derk Pereboom.Ayon Maharaj - 2018 - Journal of World Philosophies 3 (2):24-48.
    This essay reconstructs the sophisticated views on free will and determinism of the nineteenth-century Hindu mystic Sri Ramakrishna and brings them into dialogue with the views of three western philosophers—namely, the Scottish Enlightenment philosopher Lord Kames and the contemporary analytic philosophers Saul Smilansky and Derk Pereboom. Sri Ramakrishna affirms hard theological determinism, the incompatibilist view that God determines everything we do and think. At the same time, however, he claims that God, in His infinite wisdom, has endowed ordinary unenlightened (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Manipulation Arguments, Basic Desert, and Moral Responsibility: Assessing Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life.Michael McKenna - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):575-589.
    In this paper I critically assess Derk Pereboom’s book, Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. In it, I resist Pereboom’s manipulation argument for incompatibilism and his indictment of desert-based accounts of moral responsibility.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  15. Critical Notice: Consciousness and the Prospects of Physicalism, by Derk Pereboom.Derek Ball - 2014 - Analytic Philosophy 55 (1):118-129.
    Critical notice of Derk Pereboom's "Consciousness and the Prospects of Physicalism". Discusses Pereboom's idea that conscious states might be misrepresented in introspection, and his idea that instantiations of mental properties are composed of instantiations of physical properties.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  19
    Review of Derk Pereboom, Living Without Free Will. [REVIEW]Timothy O'Connor - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):308-310.
    Review of Derk Pereboom, Living Without Free Will.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  67
    Review of Derk Pereboom Consciousness and the Prospects of Physicalism. [REVIEW]Tom McClelland - 2013 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 20 (9-10):193-200.
  18.  36
    Review of Derk Pereboom's Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. [REVIEW]David Shoemaker - 2015 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews:xxx.
  19. Living Without Free Will - Derk Pereboom. [REVIEW]Giuliano Torrengo - 2011 - Humana Mente 4 (15).
  20. Pereboom on Punishment: Funishment, Innocence, Motivation, and Other Difficulties.Saul Smilansky - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):591-603.
    In Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life, Derk Pereboom proposes an optimistic model of life that follows on the rejection of both libertarian and compatibilist beliefs in free will, moral responsibility, and desert. I criticize his views, focusing on punishment. Pereboom responds to my earlier argument that hard determinism must seek to revise the practice of punishment in the direction of funishment, whereby the incarcerated are very generously compensated for the deprivations of incarceration. I claimed that funishment is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  21. Free Will Skepticism and Obligation Skepticism: Comments on Derk Pereboom’s Free Will Skepticism, Agency, and Meaning in Life.Dana Kay Nelkin - 2014 - Life, Science, Religion, Culture 1 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  31
    Michael McKenna e Derk Pereboom, Free Will – A Contemporary Introduction, New York: Routledge, 2016, 330 pp., ISBN 9781315621548. [REVIEW]José Guilherme B. A. Sutil - 2019 - Revista Filosófica de Coimbra 28 (56):500-510.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  12
    Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life, written by Derk Pereboom.David Rocheleau-Houle - 2017 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 14 (1):120-123.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  22
    Review of Derk Pereboom's Living without free will[REVIEW]Alfred R. Mele - 2003 - Mind 112 (446):375-378.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Consciousness and The Prospects of Physicalism. By Derk Pereboom.Sam Coleman - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (253):824-827.
    © 2013 The Editors of The Philosophical QuarterlyThis is a very good, very helpful book. In describing two possible outgrowths of contemporary physicalism, Pereboom performs a feat of time‐travel: he takes us forward to see the fruits ultimately to be produced by current seeds of thought. One of these branches—based on the ‘qualitative inaccuracy’ thesis—almost represents a parody of prevailing physicalist epistemic treatments of consciousness, to the extent that I can't shake the feeling that the book's first half may be (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  26.  44
    Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life, by Derk Pereboom: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. vii + 219, £30.Soraj Hongladarom - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):411-412.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  36
    Review of Derk Pereboom, Living Without Free Will[REVIEW]Erik Carlson - 2002 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, Derk Pereboom y Manuel Vargas "Four Views on Free Will".Carlos G. Patarroyo Gutiérrez - 2007 - Critica 39 (117):96-109.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  32
    Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life, by Derk Pereboom. New York: Oxford University Press.Matthew Talbert - 2016 - Mind 125 (497):248-252.
  30. Consciousness and the Prospects of Physicalism, by Derk Pereboom.T. Alter - 2012 - Mind 121 (484):1115-1122.
  31.  31
    Living Without Free Will by Derk Pereboom. [REVIEW]Carl Ginet - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (3):305-309.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   138 citations  
  32.  44
    Four Views on Free Will. By John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, Derk Pereboom, and Manuel Vargas.Hugo Meynell - 2011 - Heythrop Journal 52 (2):342-343.
  33. Four views on free will. By John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, Derk Pereboom, and Manuel Vargas.Anthony Dardis - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (1):147-153.
    Summary and brief critical evaluation of 4 views on free will (Kane, Fischer, Pereboom, Vargas).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. Pereboom’s Robust Non-reductive Physicalism.Andrew Melnyk - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (5):1191-1207.
    Derk Pereboom has recently elaborated a formulation of non-reductive physicalism in which supervenience does not play the central role and realization plays no role at all; he calls his formulation “robust non-reductive physicalism”. This paper argues that for several reasons robust non-reductive physicalism is inadequate as a formulation of physicalism: it can only rule out fundamental laws of physical-to-mental emergence by stipulating that there are no such laws; it fails to entail the supervenience of the mental on the physical; (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  35. On Pereboom’s Disappearing Agent Argument.Alfred R. Mele - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):561-574.
    This article is a critical discussion of Derk Pereboom’s “disappearing agent objection” to event-causal libertarianism in his Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. This objection is an important plank in Pereboom’s argument for free will skepticism. It is intended to knock event-causal libertarianism, a leading pro-free-will view, out of contention. I explain why readers should not find the objection persuasive.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  36.  55
    Kane, Pereboom, and Event-Causal Libertarianism.John Lemos - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (2):607-623.
    This paper provides a brief review of some of the central elements of Robert Kane’s event-causal libertarian theory of free will. It then goes on to consider four of the central criticisms Derk Pereboom has made of Kane’s view and it shows how each of these criticisms can be reasonably answered. These criticisms are the no further power/control objection, the disappearing agent/luck objection, the randomizing manipulator objection, and the problem of responsibility for efforts of will.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  37.  45
    Review of John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, Derk Pereboom, Manuel Vargas, Four Views on Free Will[REVIEW]Daniel Speak - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (5).
  38. Book Review. Living Without Free Will. Derk Pereboom. [REVIEW]Carl Ginet - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (3):305-309.
  39.  25
    Living Without Free Will by Derk Pereboom. [REVIEW]Carl Ginet - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (3):305-309.
  40. Consciousness and the Prospects of PhysicalismBy Derk Pereboom. [REVIEW]Dimitris Platchias - 2013 - Analysis 73 (4):812-814.
  41.  29
    Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life, by Derk Pereboom. [REVIEW]Leigh Vicens - 2015 - Faith and Philosophy 32 (2):230-235.
  42.  32
    Review of Free Will Skepticism in Law and Society: Challenging Retributive Justice, by Elizabeth Shaw, Derk Pereboom, Gregg D. Caruso (eds.), Cambridge University Press, 2019. [REVIEW]Jelena Mijić - 2021 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 41 (3):672-676.
  43.  13
    John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, Derk Pereboom, and Manuel Vargas, Four Views on Free Will. [REVIEW]Jason S. Miller - 2009 - Philosophical Review 118 (3):409-413.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom's Four-Case Argument.Kristin Mickelson - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):595-617.
    Derk Pereboom's Four-Case Argument is among the most famous and resilient manipulation arguments against compatibilism. I contend that its resilience is not a function of the argument's soundness but, rather, the ill-gotten gain from an ambiguity in the description of the causal relations found in the argument's foundational case. I expose this crucial ambiguity and suggest that a dilemma faces anyone hoping to resolve it. After a thorough search for an interpretation which avoids both horns of this dilemma, I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  45. Pereboom on the Frankfurt cases.David Palmer - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (2):261 - 272.
    According to the principle of alternative possibilities (PAP), a person is morally responsible for what he has done only if he could have done otherwise. In what follows, I want to defend this principle against an apparent counterexample offered recently by Derk Pereboom (Living without free will, 2001; Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 29: 228-247, 2005). Pereboom's case, a variant of what are known as Trankfurt cases,' is important for it attempts to overcome a dilemma posed for earlier alleged counterexamples (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  46. A critique of Pereboom's 'four-case argument' for incompatibilism.Alfred R. Mele - 2005 - Analysis 65 (1):75-80.
    One popular style of argument for the thesis that determinism is incompatible with moral responsibility features manipulation. Its thrust is that regarding moral responsibility, there is no important difference between various cases of manipulation in which agents who A are not morally responsible for A-ing and ordinary cases of A-ing in deterministic worlds. There is a detailed argument of this kind in Derk Pereboom’s recent book (2001: 112–26). His strategy in what he calls his ‘four-case argument’ (117) is to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  47. Replies to McKenna, Pereboom, and Kane.Mark Balaguer - 2012 - Philosophical Studies (1):1-22.
    The purpose of this essay is to respond to critiques of my recent book (Free Will as an Open Scientific Problem) put forward by Michael McKenna, Derk Pereboom, and Bob Kane in an Author-Meets-Critics session at the 2011 Pacific Division meeting of the APA.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  48. Hard- and soft-line responses to Pereboom’s four-case manipulation argument.Ishtiyaque Haji & Stefaan E. Cuypers - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (4):19 - 35.
    Derk Pereboom has advanced a four-case manipulation argument that, he claims, undermines both libertarian accounts of free action not committed to agent-causation and compatibilist accounts of such action. The first two cases are meant to be ones in which the key agent is not responsible for his actions owing to his being manipulated. We first consider a “hard-line” response to this argument that denies that the agent is not morally responsible in these cases. We argue that this response invites (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  49.  43
    A critical assessment of Pereboom’s Frankfurt-style example.Michael McKenna - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (12):3117-3129.
    In this paper, I assess Derk Pereboom’s argument for the thesis that moral responsibility does not require the ability to do otherwise. I argue that the Frankfurt-style example Pereboom develops presupposes a prior act or omission which the agent was able to avoid. This undermines his argument. I propose a way for Pereboom to revise his example and thereby undercut this objection. Along the way, I also argue that Pereboom should supplement his account of what counts as a robust (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  50.  82
    The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom's Four-Case Argument.Kristin Demetriou - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):595-617.
    Derk Pereboom's Four-Case Argument is among the most famous and resilient manipulation arguments against compatibilism. I contend that its resilience is not a function of the argument's soundness but, rather, the ill-gotten gain from an ambiguity in the description of the causal relations found in the argument's foundational case. I expose this crucial ambiguity and suggest that a dilemma faces anyone hoping to resolve it. After a thorough search for an interpretation which avoids both horns of this dilemma, I (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
1 — 50 / 351