The doctrines of Parmenides of the one being and of the world of seeming were—as is well known—interpreted in different ways in the course of the history of philosophy, and even in twentieth-century historic-philosophical research, there is no agreement on the meaning of the two parts of the poem. Regarding the one being there are four attempts of explanation to be distinguished: The being is material; the being is immaterial; it is the esse copulae or must be seen as a (...) modal category; it is the entity of being. This latter interpretation, if we can call it an interpretation, is chiefly influenced by Heidegger. The Doxa-part, however, is seen as a more or less critical doxography; a second-best, hypothetic explanation of phenomena which is not truth but verisimilitude; a systematic unit together with the first part, the ἀλήθεια We do not have to discuss the differences between the outlined explanations separately; in the following, we shall show that some modern interpretations were already expressed in a similar way in antiquity. With this, we shall concentrate especially on the Neoplatonist Simplicius who in his commentary on Aristotle’s Physics expounds the first part of the Parmenidean poem completely and, in addition, the most important doctrines of the second part. (shrink)

Diese zweisprachige Ausgabe bietet in übersichtlicher Präsentation die zentralen Texte des Cusaners, versehen mit einer Einleitung, die gründlich in das Gesamtwerk einführt. Sie basiert auf den in der PhB erschienenen Studienausgaben, die der historisch-kritischen Ausgabe der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften folgen. Die Übersetzungen stammen von namhaften Cusanusforschern, Anmerkungen, Literaturverzeichnisse und Indices erschließen die Texte. Band 1: Einleitung. De docta ignorantia / Die belehrte Unwissenheit Band 2: De coniecturis / Mutmaßungen · Idiota de sapientia / Der Laie über die Weisheit · (...) Idiota de mente / Der Laie über den Geist Band 3: Trialogus de possest / Dreiergespräch über das Können-Ist · De beryllo / Über den Beryll · Tu quis es / Über den Ursprung · De ludo globi / Gespräch über das Globusspiel Band 4: De venatione sapientiae / Die Jagd nach Weisheit · Compendium / Kompendium · De apice theoriae / Die höchste Stufe der Betrachtung "In der Geschichte der Philosophie nimmt das Werk des Nikolaus von Kues (1401–1464), das zugleich die letzte eigenwüchsige Synthese mittelalterlicher Weisheit und die gedankliche Grundlegung der großen Systeme der beginnenden Renaissance der neueren Zeit darstellt, eine epochemachende Stellung ein. Die Kühnheit seiner Fragestellungen, deren Nachwirkung noch im Denken eines Descartes, Spinoza und Leibniz und in manchen der tiefsten Ansätze des deutschen Idealismus spürbar ist, wird das philosophische Denken der Gegenwart dazu führen, sich in zunehmendem Maße mit dem Gedankengebäude des Cusanus zu beschäftigen." Raymond Klibansky. (shrink)

Die Quaestionen 84-88 enthalten zentrale Partien der thomistischen Erkenntnislehre. Hintergrund ist die mittelalterliche Kontroverse um die Einheit des Intellekts. Unveränderter Print-on-Demand-Nachdruck des durchges. Nachdr. von 1986.

I. THE TASK OF DOGMATICS As a theological discipline dogmatics is the scientific self- examination of the Christian Church with respect to the content of ...

In his preface to the English edition, Apel (identified with critical theory) explains that the title of his two-volume German collection connotes both a reconstruction of the process of hermeneutic transformation in recent philosophy and the author's semiotical transformation of transcendental logic. The emphasis here is on the latter with discussions of the a priori nature of language per Wittgenstein, Peirce, and Chomsky, and its implications for a rational foundation for ethics in modern science. Includes a new foreword. Name index (...) only. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR. (shrink)

The intent of Jaspers' philosophizing then is simply to recall us to our authentic situation. This recall is not itself a doctrine; it is only the stimulus to an inward action each must perform for himself in communication with others. Jaspers' Existenz-philosophy is thus an attempt to consider and enact human honesty; it is philosophy, not as wisdom, but as the love of wisdom.

The explanation versus understanding debate was important to the philosophy of thesocial sciences from the time of Dilthey and Weber through the work of Popper and Hempel.

Die zukunft der philosophie.--Das ethische zeitalter.--Die frauen in der philosophie.--Philosophenehen.--Die sphinx des pessimismus.--Stirner.--Philosophie und dichtung.

The introduction (pp. 7-29) discusses Nazi denigration of "Jewish philosophy, " from Spinoza to Bergson and Husserl, and the elevation of "German" philosophers, particularly Eckhart and Nietzsche, to the role of forerunners of Nazism. The chapters on the work of the four Jewish philosophers mention briefly their murder by the Nazis (in the case of Benjamin, his death while fleeing the Nazis).

v. 1. Philosophical world orientation.--v. 2. Existential elucidation.--v. 3. Metaphysics.

With the publication of Reason and Existenz, originally delivered as a series of five lectures at the University of Groningen in 1935, one of the most important of Jaspers's philosophic works is made available to the English-speaking world. It concerns itself with a general statement of the principal philosophic categories which have given uniqueness to Jaspers's thinking: existence, freedom, and history, and the limit-situations of death, suffering, and sin. Written shortly after Jaspers's major systematic work and before his analysis of (...) the problem of truth, Reason and Existenz occupies a primary position in the development of his thought. (shrink)

This book grapples with these perennial questions, primarily through a dialogue with Cornelius Castoriadis and Charles Taylor, using an interdisciplinary ...

Recently, much discussion of Hegel has focused on the nature of his idealism, and especially on its relation to Kant’s transcendental idealism—a doctrine whose meaning is itself still much in dispute. It is clear enough that Hegel calls himself an “absolute idealist,” and that he is a major figure in the “German idealist” tradition, but the precise meaning and value of falling under the idealist label is not so clear. Moreover, some recent interpretations have suggested ways in which Hegel can (...) be termed a realist, and for all interpreters it is conceded that there is a peculiarly “objective” nature to Hegel’s idealism that serves to set it apart from most other versions. (shrink)

Provides a thorough background study of the postmodern assault on the standpoint of the subject as a foundation for philosophy, and assesses what remains today of the philosophy of subjectivity.