How to Overcome Lockdown: Selective Isolation versus Contact Tracing

Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (11):724-725 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At this stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, two policy aims are imperative: avoiding the need for a general lockdown of the population, with all its economic, social and health costs, and preventing the healthcare system from being overwhelmed by the unchecked spread of infection. Achieving these two aims requires the consideration of unpalatable measures. Julian Savulescu and James Cameron argue that mandatory isolation of the elderly is justified under these circumstances, as they are at increased risk of becoming severely ill from COVID-19, and are thus likely to put disproportionate strain on limited healthcare resources. However, their arguments for this strategy are contingent on the lack of viable alternatives. We suggest that there is a possible alternative: a mandatory, centralised contact-tracing app. We argue that this strategy is ethically preferable to the selective isolation of the elderly, because it does not target members of a certain group, relying instead on the movements of each individual, and because it avoids the extended isolation of certain members of the society. Although this type of contact-tracing app has its drawbacks, we contend that this measure warrants serious consideration.

Similar books and articles

Justifying Lockdown.Christian Barry & Seth Lazar - 2020 - Ethics and International Affairs 2020.
Pandemic Transformative Experience.Ian James Kidd & Havi Carel - 2020 - The Philosophers’ Magazine 90 (24-31).
The COVID-19 containment in Vietnam: What are we doing?Toan Luu Duc Huynh - 2020 - Journal of Global Health 10 (1):010338.
Being human in the time of Covid-19.Johann-Albrecht Meylahn - 2020 - HTS Theological Studies 76 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-20

Downloads
377 (#49,622)

6 months
86 (#44,081)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lucie White
Utrecht University