Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong

Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (11):717-721 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In order to prevent the rapid spread of COVID-19, governments have placed significant restrictions on liberty, including preventing all non-essential travel. These restrictions were justified on the basis the health system may be overwhelmed by COVID-19 cases and in order to prevent deaths. Governments are now considering how they may de-escalate these restrictions. This article argues that an appropriate approach may be to lift the general lockdown but implement selective isolation of the elderly. While this discriminates against the elderly, there is a morally relevant difference—the elderly are far more likely to require hospitalisation and die than the rest of the population. If the aim is to ensure the health system is not overwhelmed and to reduce the death rate, preventing the elderly from contracting the virus may be an effective means of achieving this. The alternative is to continue to keep everyone in lockdown. It is argued that this is levelling down equality and is unethical. It suggests that in order for the elderly to avoid contracting the virus, the whole population should have their liberty deprived, even though the same result could be achieved by only restricting the liberty of the elderly. Similar arguments may also be applied to all groups at increased risk of COVID-19, such as men and those with comorbidities, the obese and people from ethnic minorities or socially deprived groups. This utilitarian concern must be balanced against other considerations, such as equality and justice, and the benefits gained from discriminating in these ways must be proportionately greater than the negative consequences of doing so. Such selective discrimination will be most justified when the liberty restriction to a group promotes the well-being of that group (apart from its wider social benefits).



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,108

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justice and the Elderly.Dennis McKerlie - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
BBS News Vol.7.Shamima Parvin Lasker - 2016 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):37.
Peoples' Attitudes towards Elderly in Bangladesh.Sharmistha Roy - 2010 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 20 (1):18-20.
Justifying Lockdown.Christian Barry & Seth Lazar - 2020 - Ethics and International Affairs 2020.
Being human in the time of Covid-19.Johann-Albrecht Meylahn - 2020 - HTS Theological Studies 76 (1).


Added to PP

46 (#277,786)

6 months
3 (#248,868)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Cameron
University of Reading

References found in this work

Equality and priority.Derek Parfit - 1997 - Ratio 10 (3):202–221.
Why Kill the Cabin Boy?John Harris - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (1):4-9.

Add more references