Justifying Lockdown

Ethics and International Affairs 2020 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our aim in this brief essay is not to defend a particular policy or attitude toward lockdown measures in the United States or elsewhere, but to consider the scope and limits of different types of arguments that can be offered for them. Understanding the complexity of these issues will, we hope, go some way to helping us understand each other and our attitudes toward state responses to the pandemic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Was Lockdown Racist?Alex Broadbent & Pieter Streicher - 2025 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 12.
Chance, consent, and COVID-19.Ryan Doody - 2023 - In Evandro Barbosa, Moral Challenges in a Pandemic Age. Routledge. pp. 204-224.
Lockdown, public good and equality during COVID-19.Lucy Frith - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (11):713-714.
Civil Liberties in a Lockdown: The Case of COVID-19.Samuel Director & Christopher Freiman - 2023 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1 (6):1-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-18

Downloads
905 (#28,037)

6 months
93 (#74,564)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Seth Lazar
Australian National University
Christian Barry
Australian National University

Citations of this work

Chance, consent, and COVID-19.Ryan Doody - 2023 - In Evandro Barbosa, Moral Challenges in a Pandemic Age. Routledge. pp. 204-224.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references