Ratio 15 (2):154–175 (2002)

Simon Critchley
The New School
There are two phrases in Heidegger's Sein und Zeit that provide a clue to what is going on in that book: Dasein ist geworfener Entwurf and Dasein existiert faktisch . I begin by trying to show how an interpretation of these phrases can help clarify Heidegger's philosophical claim about what it means to be human. I then try and explain why it is that, in a couple of important passages in Sein und Zeit, Heidegger describes thrown projection as an enigma . After considering the meaning and etymology of the word ‘enigma’, I trace its usage in Sein und Zeit, and try and show how and why the relations between Heidegger's central conceptual pairings – state‐of‐mind and understanding , thrownness and projection, facticity and existentiality – are described by Heidegger as enigmatic. My thesis is that at the heart of Sein und Zeit, that is, at the heart of the central claim of the Dasein‐analytic as to the temporal character of thrown‐projective being‐in‐the‐world, there lies an enigmatic apriori. That is to say, there is something resiliently opaque at the basis of the constitution of Dasein's being‐in‐the‐world which both resists phenomenological description and which, I shall claim, is that in virtue of which the phenomenologist describes. In the more critical part of the paper, I try and show precisely how this notion of the enigmatic apriori changes the basic experience of understanding Sein und Zeit. I explore this in relation to three examples from Division II: death, conscience and temporality. I try and read Heidegger's analyses of each of these concepts against the grain in order to bring into view much more resilient notions of facticity and thrownness that place in doubt the move to existentiality, projection and authenticity. The perspective I develop can be described as originary inauthenticity. As should become evident, such an interpretation of Sein und Zeit is not without political consequences
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9329.00182
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,008
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Love, Loss, and Finitude.Robert D. Stolorow - 2014 - Janus Head: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature, Continental Philosophy, Phenomenological Psychology, and the Arts 13 (2):35-44.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Heidegger Be Understood?Richard Schmitt - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):53 – 73.
L’être et le temps d’une traduction.Rudolf Boehm - 2005 - Studia Phaenomenologica 5:101-104.
Merleau-Ponty on Husserl: A Reappraisal.Dan Zahavi - 2002 - In Ted Toadvine & Lester E. Embree (eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Some Words About My Way to Heidegger.Richard Matz - 2005 - Studia Phaenomenologica 5:253-255.
Sein Und Zeit Revisited.Brent A. Singer - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:311-332.


Added to PP index

Total views
49 ( #231,059 of 2,505,180 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,180 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes