Symposium 21 (2):133-159 (2017)

Authors
Abstract
This analysis of Herbert Marcuse’s appropriation of the argument concerning the “mathematization of nature” in Edmund Husserl’s Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology shows that Marcuse and Husserl both assume that the perception of real, concrete individuals in the lifeworld underlies formal scientific abstractions and that the critique of the latter requires a return to such qualitative perception. In contrast, I argue that no such return is possible and that real, concrete individuals are constituted by the relation between a given perception and its horizon. In this manner, Marcuse’s social critique can be combined with Husserl’s theoretical-perceptual one, making possible an ecological critique. L’analyse de l’appropriation que fait Herbert Marcuse de l’argument concernant la « mathématisation de la nature » dans la Crise des sciences europe ennes et la phénoménologie transcendantale de Husserl démontre que Marcuse et Husserl assument tous les deux que la perception des individus réels concrets dans le monde de la vie sous-tend les abstractions scientifiques formelles et que la critique de ces dernières nécessite un retour à la perception qualificative. J’avance au contraire qu’un tel retour n’est pas possible et que les individus réels concrets sont constitués par la relation entre une perception donnée et son horizon. Nous pouvons alors combiner la critique sociale de Marcuse avec la critique théorico-perceptuelle de Husserl pour en faire une critique égologique.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Continental Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1917-9685
DOI 10.5840/symposium201721224
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Husserl’s Galileo Needed a Telescope!Don Ihde - 2011 - Philosophy and Technology 24 (1):69-82.
The Problem of the Lifeworld in Husserl's "Crisis".Edward Moser - 2000 - Dissertation, Duquesne University
Husserl’s Crisis as a Crisis of Psychology.Uljana Feest - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (2):493-503.
Lebenswelt und Reflexion.Alexander Ullig - 1992 - ProtoSociology 3:19-41.
Brentano et Husserl sur la perception sensible.Denis Fisette - 2011 - Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique 7:37-72.
Gedanken Zur Genesis der Lebenswelt.Walter Biemel - 1993 - ProtoSociology 5:15-27.
Husserl’s Transcendental Philosophy and the Critique of Naturalism.Dermot Moran - 2008 - Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4):401-425.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-10-16

Total views
31 ( #370,915 of 2,519,698 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,698 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes