The article investigates what happens when philosophy meets and begins to establish connections with two formal research methods such as game theory and network science. We use citation analysis to identify, among the articles published in Synthese and Philosophy of Science between 1985 and 2021, those that cite the specialistic literature in game theory and network science. Then, we investigate the structure of the two corpora thus identified by bibliographic coupling and divide them into clusters of related papers by automatic (...) community detection. Lastly, we construct by the same bibliometric techniques a reference map of philosophy, on which we overlay our corpora to map the diffusion of game theory and network science in the various sub-areas of recent philosophy. Three main results derive from this study. Philosophers are interested not only in using and investigating game theory as a formal method belonging to applied mathematics and sharing many relevant features with social choice theory, but also in considering its applications in more empirically oriented disciplines such as social psychology, cognitive science, or biology. Philosophers focus on networks in two research contexts and in two different ways: in the debate on causality and scientific explanation, they consider the results of network science; in social epistemology, they employ network science as a formal tool. In the reference map, logic—whose use in philosophy dates back to a much earlier period—is distributed in a more uniform way than recently encountered disciplines such as game theory and network science. We conclude by discussing some methodological limitations of our bibliometric approach, especially with reference to the problem of field delineation. (shrink)

The author elucidates the ontological basis of elementary mathematical theories and thereby assesses their certainty as a foundation for the more complex theories of modern mathematics, such as mathematical analysis and set theory. He adduces arguments in favor of the position of Frege, who held that geometry can provide a sufficiently broad and certain foundation for mathematics.

In the last decades, research in science mapping has delivered several powerful techniques, based on citation or textual analysis, for charting the intellectual organization of research fields. To map the social network underlying science and scholarship, by contrast, science mapping has mainly relied on one method, co-authorship analysis. This method, however, suffers from well-known limitations related to the practice of authorship. Moreover, it does not perform well on those fields where multi-authored publications are rare. In this study, a new method (...) for mapping the social structure of research fields is advanced, based on the analysis of the acknowledgments of academic publications. We first discuss the standard account of the function of acknowledgments in scholarly communication, then we introduce a new interpretative framework in which the acknowledgments are intended as positioning signals exchanged by researchers. Next, we provide the formal definition of the four acknowledgments-based networks that stand at the core of the method, and we test it on a humanities field, analytic philosophy. Results show that acknowledgement-based networks allow to reconstruct the fine-grained social structure of analytic philosophy from different perspectives. Furthermore, by comparing the citation-based maps of the field with the acknowledgments-based networks, it permits to shed light on the relationship between the intellectual and social layer of analytic philosophy. We conclude by presenting practical limitations of the method and by sketching some further research lines. (shrink)

t. 1. Problemy vospitanii︠a︡ vsestoronne razvitoĭ lichnosti. Dukhovnyĭ mir shkolʹnika. Metodika vospitanii︠a︡ kollektiva.--t. 2. Formirovanie Kommunisticheskikh ubezhdeniĭ molodogo pokolenii︠a︡. Kak vospitat nastoi︠a︡shchego cheloveka. Sto sovetov uchiteli︠u︡.--t. 3. Serdt︠s︡e otdai︠u︡ deti︠a︡m. Rozhdenie grazhdanina. Pisʹma k synu.--t. 4. Pavlyshskai︠a︡ sredni︠a︡i︠a︡ shkola. Razgovor s molodym direktorom shkoly.--t. 5. Statʹi.

t. 1. Serdt︠s︡e otdai︠u︡ deti︠a︡m. Rozhdenie grazhdanina.--t. 2. Pavlyshskai︠a︡ sredni︠a︡i︠a︡ shkola.

t. 1. Problemy vykhovanni︠a︡ vsebichno rozvynenoï osobystosti. Dukhovnyĭ svit shkoli︠a︡ra. Metodika vykhovanni︠a︡ kolektyvu -- t. 2. Formuvanni︠a︡ komunistychnykh perekonanʹ molodoho pokolinni︠a︡. I︠A︡k vykhovaty spravz︠h︡ni︠u︡ li︠u︡dynu. Sto porad uchytelevi -- t. 3. Sert︠s︡e viddai︠u︡ diti︠a︡m. Narodz︠h︡enni︠a︡ hromadi︠a︡nyna. Lysty do syna -- t. 4. Pavlysʹka seredni︠a︡ shkola. Rozmova z molodym dyrektorom -- t. 5. Statti.