78 found
Order:
Disambiguations
George S. Pappas [56]George Pappas [18]George Sotiros Pappas [5]George J. Pappas [1]
Georges S. Pappas [1]
  1. Justification and Knowledge: New Studies in Epistemology.George Pappas (ed.) - 1979 - Boston: D. Reidel.
    Many epistemologists have been interested in justification because of its presumed close relationship to knowledge. This relationship is intended to be ...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  2. Internalist vs. externalist conceptions of epistemic justification.George Pappas - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  3.  37
    Essays on knowledge and justification.George Sotiros Pappas & Marshall Swain (eds.) - 1978 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
  4. Internalist vs. Externalist Conceptions of Epistemic Justification.George S. Pappas - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  5. What is eliminative materialism?William G. Lycan & George S. Pappas - 1972 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (2):149-59.
    In 19651 Richard Rorty defended a theory of mind which has since come to be called' eliminative materialism'. The theory has attained some status as a distinct, autonomous brand of materialism; and it has been criticized at length in the literature, ... \n.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  6. Essays on Knowledge and Justification.George S. Pappas & Marshall Swain - 1978 - Critica 10 (29):140-143.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  7.  25
    Justification and Knowledge.Hilary Kornblith & George Pappas - 1981 - Philosophical Review 90 (4):627.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  8.  61
    Symposiums papers: Sensation and perception in Reid.George S. Pappas - 1989 - Noûs 23 (2):155-167.
  9.  84
    Berkeley's thought.George Sotiros Pappas - 2000 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
    He assesses the validity of this self-description and considers why Berkeley might have chosen to align himself with a commonsense position.Pappas shows how ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  10. Essays on Knowledge and Justification.George S. Pappas & Marshall Swain - 1979 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 33 (4):647-650.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  11.  37
    Lost Justification.George S. Pappas - 1980 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):127-134.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  12. Essays on Knowledge and Justification.George Pappas & Marshall Swain - 1979 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 169 (1):117-118.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  13.  57
    Some conclusive reasons against 'conclusive reasons'.George S. Pappas & Marshall Swain - 1973 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):72 – 76.
  14. Some Forms of Epistemological Scepticism.George Pappas - 1978 - In George Sotiros Pappas & Marshall Swain (eds.), Essays on knowledge and justification. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. pp. 309--316.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  15.  67
    Ideas, Minds, and Berkeley.George S. Pappas - 1980 - American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (3):181 - 194.
    A number of commentators on the work of berkeley have maintained that berkeleyan minds are related to ideas by the relation of inherence. Thus, Ideas are taken to inhere in minds in something like the way that accidents were supposed to inhere in substances for the aristotelian. This inherence account, As I call it, Is spelled out in detail and critically evaluated. Ultimately it is rejected despite its considerable initial plausibility.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  16.  33
    The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume.M. R. Ayers, Phillip D. Cummins, Robert Fogelin, Don Garrett, Edwin McCann, Charles J. McCracken, George Pappas, G. A. J. Rogers, Barry Stroud, Ian Tipton, Margaret D. Wilson & Kenneth Winkler - 1998 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    This collection of essays on themes in the work of John Locke , George Berkeley , and David Hume , provides a deepened understanding of major issues raised in the Empiricist tradition. In exploring their shared belief in the experiential nature of mental constructs, The Empiricists illuminates the different methodologies of these great Enlightenment philosophers and introduces students to important metaphysical and epistemological issues including the theory of ideas, personal identity, and skepticism. It will be especially useful in courses devoted (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  17.  94
    Abstract General Ideas in Hume.George S. Pappas - 1989 - Hume Studies 15 (2):339-352.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Abstract General Ideas in Hume George S. Pappas Hume followed Berkeley in rejecting abstract general ideas; that is, both of these philosophers rejected the view that one could engage in the operation or activity ofabstraction — a kind ofmental separation ofentities that are inseparable in reality —as well as the view that the alleged products of such an activity — ideas which are intrinsically general — really exist. What (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  18. ``Basing Relations".George Pappas - 1979 - In Justification and Knowledge: New Studies in Epistemology. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 51-65.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  19. Causation and perception in Reid.George S. Pappas - 1990 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (4):763-766.
  20.  62
    Hume and Abstract General Ideas.George S. Pappas - 1977 - Hume Studies 3 (1):17-31.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:17. HUME AND ABSTRACT GENERAL IDEAS In his discussion of abstract ideas in the Treatise, Hume offers what "...may... be thought... a plain dilemma, that decides concerning the nature of those abstract ideas..." He states the dilemma in these words: The abstract idea of a man represents men of all sizes and all qualities; which 'tis concluded it cannot do, but either by representing at once all possible sizes (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  21. Seeinge and seeingn.George S. Pappas - 1976 - Mind 85 (338):171-188.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  22.  73
    The epistemology of speaker-meaning.Steven E. Boër & George S. Pappas - 1975 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):204 – 219.
  23.  56
    On some philosophical accounts of perception.George S. Pappas - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28 (Supplement):71-82.
    Philosophical accounts of perception in the tradition of Kant and Reid have generally supposed that an event of making a judgment is a key element in every perceptual experience. An alternative very austere view regards perception as an event containing nothing judgmental, nor anything conceptual. This account of perception as nonconceptual is discussed first historically as found in the philosophies of Locke and (briefly) Berkeley, and then examined in the contemporary work of Chisholm and Alston.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  24. Berkeley and Scepticism.George Pappas - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):133-149.
    In both the Principles and the Three Dialogues, Berkeley claims that he wants to uncover those principles which lead to scepticism; to refute those principles; and to refute scepticism itself. This paper examines the principles Berkeley says have scepticial consequences, and contends that only one of them implies scepticism. It is also argued that Berkeley’s attempted refutation of scepticism rests not on his acceptance of the esse est percipi principle, but rather on the thesis that physical objects and their sensible (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  25. Access Internalism.George Pappas - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):159-169.
    Access internalism about epistemic justification is the thesis that a person’s justification for a belief is directly accessible to that person, in the sense that the person can have direct awareness of whatever is functioning as the actual justification for the belief. This thesis is distinguished into a weak and a strong version, and a number of arguments in favor of the access internalist position are assessed. It is concluded that none of the arguments in support of access internalism is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  26. Philosophical Problems and Arguments: An Introduction, 4th ed.James W. Cornman, Keith Lehrer & George Sotiros Pappas - 1992 - Hackett.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  27.  59
    Abstraction and Existence.George Pappas - 2002 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 19 (1):43 - 63.
  28.  70
    Berkeley and Common Sense Realism.George S. Pappas - 1991 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1):27 - 42.
  29. Berkeley and Immediate Perception.George S. Pappas - 1987 - In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. D. Reidel.
  30. Berkeleian Idealism and Impossible Performances.George Pappas - 1995 - In Robert G. Muehlmann (ed.), Berkeley's Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  31.  17
    Epistemology in the Empiricists.George S. Pappas - 1998 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 15 (3):285 - 302.
  32.  43
    Incorrigibilism and future science.George S. Pappas - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 28 (September):207-210.
  33.  51
    Incorrigibility, knowledge and justification.George S. Pappas - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 25 (April):219-25.
  34. Non-inferential knowledge.George S. Pappas - 1982 - Philosophia 12 (1-2):81-98.
  35.  80
    Perception of the Self.George S. Pappas - 1992 - Hume Studies 18 (2):275-280.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Perception of the Self George S. Pappas Differences of detail aside, we may think ofboth Locke and Berkeley as accepting the same view of the mind. They agree that there are minds, and that each mind is a simple, immaterial substance. Sometimes the word 'soul' is used instead of'mind'; but in this context, the different terminology is not consequential. Moreover, Locke and Berkeley employ essentially the same argument for (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  36.  24
    Risk verification of stochastic systems with neural network controllers.Matthew Cleaveland, Lars Lindemann, Radoslav Ivanov & George J. Pappas - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence 313 (C):103782.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  75
    Abstract ideas and the new theory of vision.George S. Pappas - 2002 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (1):55 – 69.
    In the _New Theory of Vision, Berkeley defends the heterogeneity thesis, i.e., the view that the ideas of sight and touch are numerically and specifically distinct. In sections 121-122 of that work, he suggests that the thesis of abstract ideas is somehow closely connected to the heterogeneity thesis, though he does not there fully explain just what the connection is supposed to be. In this paper an interpretation of this connection is proposed and defended. Berkeley needs to reject abstract ideas (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  39
    Armstrong's materialism.George S. Pappas - 1977 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (September):569-592.
    Central-state materialism is a very strong, but also very exciting theory of mind according to which each mental state is identical with a state of the central nervous system. CSM thus goes considerably beyond early versions of the identity theory of mind, since those early accounts held only that sensations are to be identified with neural events. CSM, by contrast, is a thesis about all mental states; every mental state is held to be a state of the central nervous system. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  32
    Adversary Metaphysics.George S. Pappas - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:571-585.
    Berkeley construes his own immaterialist philosophy as facing a serious competitor, namely, what he often termed ‘materialism.’ He tries on several grounds to eliminate materialism from the competition, thus leaving immaterialism as the most plausible metaphysical theory of perception and the external world. In this paper these grounds are explored, and it is found that Berkeley’s method for rational choice between materialism and immaterialism involves consideration of a host of criteria for choice between competitive theories.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  11
    Adversary Metaphysics.George S. Pappas - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:571-585.
    Berkeley construes his own immaterialist philosophy as facing a serious competitor, namely, what he often termed ‘materialism.’ He tries on several grounds to eliminate materialism from the competition, thus leaving immaterialism as the most plausible metaphysical theory of perception and the external world. In this paper these grounds are explored, and it is found that Berkeley’s method for rational choice between materialism and immaterialism involves consideration of a host of criteria for choice between competitive theories.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  15
    Adversary Metaphysics.George S. Pappas - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:571-585.
    Berkeley construes his own immaterialist philosophy as facing a serious competitor, namely, what he often termed ‘materialism.’ He tries on several grounds to eliminate materialism from the competition, thus leaving immaterialism as the most plausible metaphysical theory of perception and the external world. In this paper these grounds are explored, and it is found that Berkeley’s method for rational choice between materialism and immaterialism involves consideration of a host of criteria for choice between competitive theories.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  52
    A Second Copy Thesis in Hume?George S. Pappas - 1991 - Hume Studies 17 (1):51-59.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:A Second Copy Thesis in Hume? George S. Pappas The copy thesis which applies to simple ideas andimpressionsin Hume is well known; every simple idea is supposed to be a copy of, that is, to exactly resemble, some simple impression. Or very nearly so, at any rate, for there is the famous missing shade ofblue to take into account. There seems to be another copy thesis in Hume, however, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Berkeley's Assessment of Locke's Epistemology.George S. Pappas - 2007 - In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), Philosophica.
    In this essay, the author analyses Berkeley’s conformity and inference argument against Locke’s theory of percep tion. Both arguments are not as decisive as traditionally has been perceived and fail to engage in Locke’s actual position. The main reason for this is that Berkeley does not see that Locke’s position is compatible with the non-inferential nature of perceptual knowledge.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  19
    Berkeley’s assessment of Locke’s epistemology.George S. Pappas - 2005 - Philosophica 76 (2).
    In this essay, the author analyses Berkeley’s conformity and inference argument against Locke’s theory of percep tion. Both arguments are not as decisive as traditionally has been perceived and fail to engage in Locke’s actual position. The main reason for this is that Berkeley does not see that Locke’s position is compatible with the non-inferential nature of perceptual knowledge.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  53
    Berkeley's Positive Epistemology.George S. Pappas - 2011 - Philosophical Inquiry 35 (3-4):23-35.
  46. Berkeley's Treatment of Skepticism.George Pappas - 2008 - In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford handbook of skepticism. New York: Oxford University Press.
  47.  15
    Comments on Goldman and on Intelligent Design.George Pappas - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):23-27.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Common Sense in Berkeley and Reid in Sens commun.George S. Pappas - 1986 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 40 (158):292-303.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Defining incorrigibility.George S. Pappas - 1975 - Personalist 56 (4):395-402.
  50. Defining Incorrigibility.George S. Pappas - 1975 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 56 (4):395.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 78