Berkeley’s assessment of Locke’s epistemology

Philosophica 76 (2) (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay, the author analyses Berkeley’s conformity and inference argument against Locke’s theory of percep tion. Both arguments are not as decisive as traditionally has been perceived and fail to engage in Locke’s actual position. The main reason for this is that Berkeley does not see that Locke’s position is compatible with the non-inferential nature of perceptual knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Berkeley’s Lockean Religious Epistemology.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2014 - Journal of the History of Ideas 75 (3):417-438.
Berkeley's theory of abstract ideas.C. C. W. Taylor - 1978 - Philosophical Quarterly 28 (111):97-115.
Berkeley v. Locke on Primary Qualities.Barry Stroud - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (212):149-166.
Locke and Berkeley; a collection of critical essays.C. B. Martin - 1968 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor Books. Edited by D. M. Armstrong.
Locke and Berkeley.C. B. Martin & David M. Armstrong (eds.) - 1968 - London,: University of Notre Dame Press.
Locke, Berkeley, Hume.Charles Richard Morris - 1931 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-13

Downloads
16 (#883,649)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references