Journal of Business Ethics 28 (1):1 - 14 (2000)
AbstractWe argue that consumer sovereignty in an increasingly high tech world is more of a fiction than a fact. We show how the principle of consumer sovereignty that governs the societal impact of economic competition is no longer valid. The world of high tech is increasingly responsible for changes in the opportunity, ability, and motivation of business firms to compete. Furthermore, the world of high tech is increasingly responsible for changes in the opportunity, ability, and motivation of consumers to engage in rational decision making. We conclude that we cannot rely on consumer sovereignty to maintain a thriving economy. Instead, we need to develop performance standards designed to meet the demands of the various stakeholders of the organization.
Similar books and articles
Marketing strategy, product safety, and ethical factors in consumer choice.Eleonora Curlo - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 21 (1):37 - 48.
Consumer Sovereignty in Healthcare: Fact or Fiction? [REVIEW]M. Joseph Sirgy, Dong-Jin Lee & Grace B. Yu - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (3):459-474.
Ethics committees for "high tech" innovations in japan.Rihito Kimura - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):457-464.
Taking consumers seriously: Two concepts of consumer sovereignty. [REVIEW]Michiel Korthals - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):201-215.
Consumer ethical beliefs and personality traits: An exploratory analysis. [REVIEW]Kumar C. Rallapalli, Scott J. Vitell, Frank A. Wiebe & James H. Barnes - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (7):487 - 495.
After Sovereignty: On the Question of Political Beginnings.Charles Barbour & George Pavlich (eds.) - 2009 - Routledge.
Consuming Choices: Ethics in a Global Consumer Age.David T. Schwartz - 2010 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
A comparison of experts' and high tech students' ethical beliefs in computer-related situations.Susan Athey - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (5):359 - 370.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Is Transparency the Best Disinfectant?Amitai Etzioni - 2010 - Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (4):389-404.
Well-being marketing: An ethical business philosophy for consumer goods firms.M. Joseph Sirgy & Dong-Jin Lee - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (4):377-403.
Does Relationship Quality Matter in Consumer Ethical Decision Making? Evidence from China.Zhiqiang Liu, Fue Zeng & Chenting Su - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (3):483 - 496.
The emerging role of Big Data in key development issues: Opportunities, challenges, and concerns.Nir Kshetri - 2014 - Big Data and Society 1 (2).
References found in this work
Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis.Kenneth E. Goodpaster - 1991 - Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1):53-73.
Principles of categorization.Eleanor Rosch - 1988 - In Allan Collins & Edward E. Smith (eds.), Readings in Cognitive Science, a Perspective From Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. pp. 312-22.
A balanced concept of the firm and the measurement of its long-term planning and performance.Georges Enderle & Lee A. Tavis - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1129-1144.
Does the Stakeholder Theory Constitute a New Kind of Theory of Social Responsibility?Thomas L. Carson - 1993 - Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (2):171-176.