A balanced concept of the firm and the measurement of its long-term planning and performance
Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1129-1144 (1998)
Abstract
This paper offers a new concept of the firm that aims at balancing the corporate economic, social, and environmental responsibilities and goes beyond the stakeholder approach. It intends to provide a conceptual and operationalizable basis to fairly assess corporate conduct from both inside and outside the companies. To a large extent these different responsibilities may overlap and reinforce each other. However, if they conflict, they should be clearly evaluated for their own sake and in terms of wealth creation. Only then can a balanced approach be realized. Section 1 briefly discusses some general aspects of the relationship between concepts and measurement. In Section 2, a concept of the firm is developed that is based on the notion of responsibility and balances economic, social and environmental responsibilities. According to these concepts, different ways of measuring corporate planning and performance are examined in Section 3, followed up by a summary and conclusions.Reprint years
2004
DOI
10.1023/a:1005746212024
My notes
Similar books and articles
The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance.Irene Goll & Abdul A. Rasheed - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 49 (1):41-54.
Integrating the ethical dimension into the analytical framework for the reform of state-owned enterprises in china's socialist market economy: A proposal. [REVIEW]Georges Enderle - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 30 (3):261 - 275.
Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994–2006.A. Salama, K. Anderson & J. S. Toms - 2011 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 20 (2):192-204.
Toward Dynamic Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility: From Corporate Social Responsibility Toward a Comprehensive and Dynamic View of Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility.Sybille Sachs & Marc Maurer - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (S3):535-544.
Does firm size comfound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance?Marc Orlitzky - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (2):167 - 180.
The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. [REVIEW]Peter A. Stanwick & Sarah D. Stanwick - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2):195-204.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
62 (#194,083)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2009-01-28
Downloads
62 (#194,083)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Doing Right Leads to Doing Well: When the Type of CSR and Reputation Interact to Affect Consumer Evaluations of the Firm. [REVIEW]Yuan-Shuh Lii & Monle Lee - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (1):69-81.
CSR Practices and Corporate Strategy: Evidence from a Longitudinal Case Study.Lucio Lamberti & Emanuele Lettieri - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):153-168.
Non Discrimination as a moral obligation in Human resources management.Geert Demuijnck - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (S1):83-101.
Global competition and corporate responsibilities of small and medium-sized enterprises.Georges Enderle - 2004 - Business Ethics: A European Review 13 (1):50-63.
Global competition and corporate responsibilities of small and medium‐sized enterprises.Georges Enderle - 2004 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 13 (1):50-63.