Wang Yangming on 'Unquestioning Obedience' and Epistemic Superiority

Philosophy East and West 73 (3):718-739 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Abstract:Within various contexts, such as politics and parenting, Confucianism has been criticized on the basis that it endorses 'unquestioning obedience' to authority. In recent years, several philosophers have argued against this view by appealing to textual evidence from Classical Confucian philosophers. This article examines Wang Yangming's views on this subject, arguing that Wang teaches that criticism of those who stand in a socially superior role relation is not only permitted, but encouraged. From this, the implications that Wang's analysis has for contemporary discussions of disagreement between epistemic superiors and inferiors and epistemic peerhood are considered. It will be argued that Wang's position is much closer to the total evidence view than the preemptive view. Relatedly, it is suggested that Wang provides a novel proposal about how to recognize or disregard epistemic 'superiors', especially in the context of moral knowledge.

Similar books and articles

王学之思.Yangming Wang & "Wang Xue Zhi Si" Bian Ji Wei Yuan Hui (eds.) - 1999 - Guiyang Shi: Guizhou min zu chu ban she.
Wang yangming.Youngmin Kim - 2005 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
与朱熹王阳明对话.Meihua Guo - 2002 - Shanghai: Shanghai gu ji chu ban she.
Wang Yangming yu Yangming wen hua.Xiaoxin Wang & Pinglue Zhao (eds.) - 2011 - Beijing Shi: Zhonghua shu ju.
日本的古学及陽明学.Qianzhi Zhu - 2000 - Beijing: Xin hua shu dian jing xiao.


Added to PP

314 (#51,439)

6 months
189 (#7,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daryl Ooi
National University of Singapore

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The epistemic significance of disagreement.Thomas Kelly - 2005 - In Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Volume 1. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 167-196.
Neo-Confucianism: A Philosophical Introduction.Stephen C. Angle & Justin Tiwald - 2017 - Cambridge, UK: Polity. Edited by Justin Tiwald.
Moral disagreement and moral skepticism.Katia Vavova - 2014 - Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1):302-333.
The Reflective Epistemic Renegade.Bryan Frances - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (2):419 - 463.

View all 23 references / Add more references