Rethinking the Belmont Report?

American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):15-21 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article reflects on the relevance and applicability of the Belmont Report nearly four decades after its original publication. In an exploration of criticisms that have been raised in response to the report and of significant changes that have occurred within the context of biomedical research, five primary themes arise. These themes include the increasingly vague boundary between research and practice, unique harms to communities that are not addressed by the principle of respect for persons, and how growing complexity and commodification in research have shed light on the importance of transparency. The repercussions of Belmont's emphasis on the protection of vulnerable populations is also explored, as is the relationship between the report's ethical principles and their applications. It is concluded that while the Belmont Report was an impressive response to the ethical issues of its day, the field of research ethics involving human subjects may have outgrown it.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,378

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autonomy and informed consent: A mistaken association? [REVIEW]Sigurdur Kristinsson - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):253-264.
Vulnerable populations in research: The case of the seriously ill.Philip J. Nickel - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):245-264.
The Belmont Report.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2008 - In Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.), The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 149--55.
Revisiting the Belmont Report.Wesley J. Smith - 2001 - Hastings Center Report 31 (2):5.
How the Belmont Report Fails.Richard B. Miller - 2003 - Essays in Philosophy 4 (2):119-134.


Added to PP

51 (#273,463)

6 months
9 (#141,525)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Phoebe Friesen
McGill University
Arthur L. Caplan
New York University