Results for 'immediate recall in minimal paired-associate learning, semantic-similarity compatibility'

993 found
Order:
  1.  37
    Semantic coding and short-term memory.A. D. Baddeley & Betty A. Levy - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (1):132.
  2.  20
    Minimal paired-associate learning.Lloyd R. Peterson & Margaret Jean Peterson - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (6):521.
  3.  12
    Effects of formal similarity on cue selection in verbal paired-associate learning.Jean C. Cohen & Barbara S. Musgrave - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (6):829.
  4.  38
    A measure of stimulus similarity and errors in some paired-associate learning tasks.Ernst Z. Rothkopf - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (2):94.
  5.  16
    Context factors in paired-associate learning and recall.Donald M. Sundland & Delos D. Wickens - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (3):302.
  6.  9
    Imagery effects in continuous paired-associate learning.Edward J. Rowe & Shannon K. Smith - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 99 (2):290.
  7.  21
    Stimulus recall following paired-associate learning.Samuel M. Feldman & Benton J. Underwood - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (1):11.
  8.  28
    Interaction of arousal and recall interval in nonsense syllable paired-associate learning.Lewis J. Kleinsmith & Stephen Kaplan - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (2):124.
  9.  12
    Clustering in free recall following paired-associate learning.Peggy A. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):260.
  10.  37
    Wordform Similarity Increases With Semantic Similarity: An Analysis of 100 Languages.Isabelle Dautriche, Kyle Mahowald, Edward Gibson & Steven T. Piantadosi - 2017 - Cognitive Science:2149-2169.
    Although the mapping between form and meaning is often regarded as arbitrary, there are in fact well-known constraints on words which are the result of functional pressures associated with language use and its acquisition. In particular, languages have been shown to encode meaning distinctions in their sound properties, which may be important for language learning. Here, we investigate the relationship between semantic distance and phonological distance in the large-scale structure of the lexicon. We show evidence in 100 languages from (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  11.  15
    Comparison of anticipation and recall methods in paired-associate learning.Charles N. Cofer, Florence Diamond, Richard A. Olsen, Judith S. Stein & Howard Walker - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):545.
  12.  13
    Meaningfulness and articulation of stimulus and response in paired-associate learning and recall.Raymond G. Hunt - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (4):262.
  13.  20
    The importance of the within-trial interval in the superiority of the recall over anticipation method of paired-associate learning.Mitchell G. Brigell, Charles P. Thompson & Sam C. Brown - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (2):131-133.
  14.  12
    Acoustic similarity among stimuli as a source of interference in paired-associate learning.Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):319.
  15.  14
    Formal intralist stimulus similarity in paired-associate learning.Willard N. Runquist - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):634.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  19
    Presentation rate effects in paired-associate learning.Robert C. Calfee & Rita Anderson - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (2):239.
  17.  26
    Effects of two- word stimuli on recall and learning in a paired-associate task.Barabara S. Musgrave & Jean Carl Cohen - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (2):161.
  18.  15
    Stimulus Selection and Meaningfulness in Paired-Associate Learning with Stimulus Items of High Formal Similarity.R. S. Lockhart - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (2p1):242.
  19.  14
    Word Meaning Contributes to Free Recall Performance in Supraspan Verbal List-Learning Tests.Sandrine Cremona, Gaël Jobard, Laure Zago & Emmanuel Mellet - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Supraspan verbal list-learning tests, such as the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), are classic neuropsychological tests for assessing verbal memory. In this study, we investigated the impact of the meaning of the words to be learned on 3 memory stages (short-term recall, learning, and delayed recall) in a cohort of 447 healthy adults. First, we compared scores obtained from the RAVLT (word condition) to those of an alternative version of this test using phonologically similar but meaningless items (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  18
    Constant versus varied serial order in paired-associate learning: The effect of formal intralist similarity.Eugene D. Rubin & Sam C. Brown - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (2):257.
  21.  22
    Stimulus similarity and sequence of stimulus presentation in paired-associate learning.Ernst Z. Rothkopf - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (2):114.
  22.  14
    Stimulus-recognition and response-recall dependency in paired-associate learning.Mary E. Grunke & James V. Hinrichs - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (6):453-455.
  23.  20
    Is the acquired-pleasantness effect in paired-associate learning free from confounding by meaningfulness and similarity?Albert Silverstein - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1):116.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  10
    Response learning in paired-associate lists as a function of intralist similarity.Benton J. Underwood, Willard N. Runquist & Rudolph W. Schulz - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1):70.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  25.  24
    Prerecall and postrecall imagery ratings with pictorial and verbal stimuli in paired-associate learning.Frank W. Wicker & Carolyn M. Evertson - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (1):75.
  26.  26
    Experimental studies in rote-learning theory. IV. Comparison of reminiscence in serial and paired-associate learning.C. I. Hovland - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (5):466.
  27.  9
    Structural effects of letter identity among stimuli in paired-associate learning.Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1):152.
  28.  9
    Interaction of arousal and number of learning trials in paired-associate learning.John W. Osborne - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (1):135.
  29.  23
    Effects of word frequency and acoustic similarity on free-recall and paired-associate-recognition learning.Stephen W. Holborn, Karen L. Gross & Pamela A. Catlin - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1):169.
  30.  22
    Independent variation of information storage and retrieval processes in paired-associate learning.W. K. Estes & Frank da Polito - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):18.
  31.  33
    Effect of tests without feedback and presentation-test interval in paired-associate learning.Thomas K. Landauer & Lynn Eldridge - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (3):290.
  32.  10
    Minimal paired-associate learning.Lloyd R. Peterson & Kenneth P. Hillner - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (3):300.
  33.  15
    The Effect of Visual Mnemonics and the Presentation of Character Pairs on Learning Visually Similar Characters for Chinese-As-Second-Language Learners.Li-Yun Chang, Yuan-Yuan Tang, Chia-Yun Lee & Hsueh-Chih Chen - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    This study investigates the effects of visual mnemonics and the methods of presenting learning materials on learning visually similar characters for Chinese-as-second-language learners. In supporting CSL learners to build robust orthographic representations in Chinese, addressing the challenges of visual similarity of characters is an important issue. Based on prior research on perceptual learning, we tested three strategies that differ in the extent to which they promote interrelated attention to the form and meaning of characters: Stroke Sequence, a form-emphasis strategy, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  11
    Effects of within-list and between-list acoustic similarity on the learning and retention of paired associates.Kent M. Dallett - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (5):667.
  35.  20
    Similarity in stimulating conditions as a variable in retroactive inhibition.Ina Mcdonald Bilodeau & Harold Schlosberg - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (3):199.
  36.  10
    Associative interference in verbal paired-associate learning.Norma F. Besch & William F. Reynolds - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (6):554.
  37.  11
    Verbal paired-associate learning as a function of grouping similar stimuli or responses.Iris C. Rotberg & Myron Woolman - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):47.
  38.  10
    Response elimination in noncorrection paired-associates learning.Ludwig Mosberg - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (1p1):94.
  39.  20
    Paired-associate learning as a function of similarity: Common stimulus and response items within the list.Takao Umemoto & Ernest R. Hilgard - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):97.
  40.  11
    Studies in retroactive inhibition: X. The influence of similarity of meaning between lists of paired associates.J. A. McGeoch & G. O. McGeoch - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 21 (3):320.
  41.  28
    Abstraction in verbal paired-associate learning.Barbara S. Musgrave & Jean C. Cohen - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1):1.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  24
    Associative transfer in motor paired-associate learning as a function of amount of first-task practice.Charles C. Spiker & Ruth B. Holton - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (2):123.
  43.  14
    Intermodal transfer in a paired-associates learning task.Gary L. Holmgren, Malcolm D. Arnoult & Winton H. Manning - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):254.
  44.  17
    Mediated association in the paired-associate learning of children using heterogeneous and homogeneous lists.David S. Palermo - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (5):711.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  23
    Tachistoscopic recognition thresholds, paired-associate learning, and free recall as a function of abstractness-concreteness and word frequency.Wilma A. Winnick & Kenneth Kressel - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (2):163.
  46.  13
    Effect of meaningfulness on cue selection in verbal paired-associate learning.Jean Carl Cohen & Barbara S. Musgrave - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):284.
  47.  35
    Semantic satiation and paired-associate learning.R. N. Kanungo, W. E. Lambert & S. M. Mauer - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (6):600.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  23
    A replication of paired-associate learning as a function of S-R similarity.Slater E. Newman - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (6):592.
  49.  14
    Similarity Judgment Within and Across Categories: A Comprehensive Model Comparison.Russell Richie & Sudeep Bhatia - 2021 - Cognitive Science 45 (8):e13030.
    Similarity is one of the most important relations humans perceive, arguably subserving category learning and categorization, generalization and discrimination, judgment and decision making, and other cognitive functions. Researchers have proposed a wide range of representations and metrics that could be at play in similarity judgment, yet have not comprehensively compared the power of these representations and metrics for predicting similarity within and across different semantic categories. We performed such a comparison by pairing nine prominent vector (...) representations with seven established similarity metrics that could operate on these representations, as well as supervised methods for dimensional weighting in the similarity function. This approach yields a factorial model structure with 126 distinct representation‐metric pairs, which we tested on a novel dataset of similarity judgments between pairs of cohyponymic words in eight categories. We found that cosine similarity and Pearson correlation were the overall best performing unweighted similarity functions, and that word vectors derived from free association norms often outperformed word vectors derived from text (including those specialized for similarity). Importantly, models that used human similarity judgments to learn category‐specific weights on dimensions yielded substantially better predictions than all unweighted approaches across all types of similarity functions and representations, although dimension weights did not generalize well across semantic categories, suggesting strong category context effects in similarity judgment. We discuss implications of these results for cognitive modeling and natural language processing, as well as for theories of the representations and metrics involved in similarity. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  50.  43
    Cue-dependent forgetting in paired-associate learning.Tannis Y. Arbuckle - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (1):124.
1 — 50 / 993