El llamado "argumento de los posibles" desarrollado por Kant en el Beweisgrund está destinado a demostrar la existencia del ens realissimum de la tradición metafísica moderna. El presente estudio pretende explorar la importancia de esta prueba en el contexto global del pensamiento kantiano, a partir de la ambigüedad del concepto de realidad y de su precisión en la filosofía crítica.

Kant assents to Leibniz’s claim that purely positive concepts cannot contradict each other. Albeit counter-intuitive, this claim is well-grounded in Kant’s views on contradiction and conceptual content. First, according to Kant, a contradiction only occurs if a predicate is affirmed and negated; second, all concepts except of those that pertain to God covertly contain negative marks. Although I shall argue that Kant’s account fails, it is still interesting in that it tackles an overlooked problem, namely how implicit contradictions are possible.

The task of my inquiry is to lay out the main lines of Eugen Fink’s reading of Kant, focusing on his interpretation of the Transcendental Dialectic. In the first part, I explain Fink’s claim that the Transcendental Dialectic represents the very heart of the Kantian project, in as much it is in this section of the first Critique that the question of totality (on Fink’s account, the driving impetus of this work) first comes to the forefront. Secondly, I undertake an (...) examination of Fink’s argument regarding the proper outcome of the “Antinomies of Pure Reason,” according to which the failure of the attempts to determine the world with “innerworldly models” is not a sufficient reason to contend that the world is merely a subjective idea. Finally, I discuss Fink’s thesis concerning the construction of the “Transcendental Ideal” according to which the transition from the omnitudo realitatis to the ens realissimum is not necessary (neither objectively, nor subjectively). In this regard, Fink’s project can be understood as an attempt to think the omnitudo realitatis for itself, prior to and independent from any realization in a being (be it a supreme one). (shrink)

全书分五个部分, 分别从经济秩序的伦理理论、经济学的秩序理论、经济秩序的法律问题、文化性质和关于秩序政策的第三条道路的可能性等观点, 研讨了经济秩序问题.

El diálogo que a continuación presentamos a la comunidad de lectores y lectoras tuvo lugar el 20 de abril del 2021 en el contexto del primer ciclo de conversatorios “Masculinidades y emancipación en América Latina. Tiempos de crisis/tiempos de invención”, promovido por el colectivo de trabajo “Masculinidades en América Latina: Fricciones, Fugas y Fisuras”. Esta transcripción la editó y corrigió Daniel González Marín Grabación original del conversatorio en: https://www.facebook.com/masculinidades.friccionesfugasfisuras/videos/107791384769511.