Prenatal diagnosis: do prospective parents have the right not to know?

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (2):279-286 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Prenatal diagnosis challenges the issue of parental autonomy. Two ethical aspects of the parental decision making process with reference to PND have been taken into consideration: the duty to know and the right not to know. Whilst the first approach has been widely discussed in literature, the latter seems to be overlooked. In order to find good moral reasons supporting the right not to know, firstly the duty to know approach was critically analysed. Subsequently, the emphasis was put on the unconditional parental love and the issue of child’s best interests as the features supporting parental right not to know. The clarification of what is good parenthood was presented as the best normative approach supporting the parental right not to know in case of PND. Apart from parental autonomy, raising the question of the right not to know is important in the debate about the place and role of people with disabilities in society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wisdom, casuistry, and the goal of reproductive counseling.Anders Nordgren - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3):281-289.
Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled.L. Gillam - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):163-171.
Prenatal diagnosis: whose right?D. Heyd - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (5):292-297.
Prenatal Diagnosis: Confronting the Ethical Issues.Agneta Sutton - 1990 - Linacre Centre for Health Care Ethics.
Does Prenatal Diagnosis Discriminate Against the Disabled?H. Houghton - forthcoming - Ethical Issues in Prenatal Diagnosis and the Termination of Pregnancy.
Procreative beneficence and the prospective parent.P. Herissone-Kelly - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):166-169.
Autonomy and freedom of choice in prenatal genetic diagnosis.Elisabeth Hildt - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-07

Downloads
35 (#456,481)

6 months
6 (#520,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anna Sierawska
Technical University of Munich

Citations of this work

All in the family.Henk ten Have & Bert Gordijn - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (1):1-2.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Reasons of Love.Harry G. Frankfurt - 2004 - Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
The Reasons of Love.Harry G. Frankfurt - 2006 - Princeton University Press.
Life's Dominion.Melissa Lane & Ronald Dworkin - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (176):413.

View all 20 references / Add more references