Prenatal diagnosis: whose right?

Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (5):292-297 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question who is the subject of the right to prenatal diagnosis may be answered in four ways: the parents, the child, society, or no one. This article investigates the philosophical issues involved in each of these answers, which touch upon the conditions of personal identity, the principle of privacy, the scope of social responsibility, and the debate about impersonalism in ethics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Autonomy and freedom of choice in prenatal genetic diagnosis.Elisabeth Hildt - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.
Genetic counseling and termination of pregnancy in hungary.Zoltan Papp - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):323-333.
A new era in prenatal testing: are we prepared? [REVIEW]Dagmar Schmitz - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled.L. Gillam - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):163-171.
Prenatal Diagnosis: Confronting the Ethical Issues.V. N. Bolton - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (4):218-219.
Prenatal diagnosis, personal identity, and disability.James Lindemann Nelson - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):213-228.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
78 (#209,251)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?