The Moral Obligation to Create Children with the Best Chance of the Best Life

Bioethics 23 (5):274-290 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


According to what we call the Principle of Procreative Beneficence, couples who decide to have a child have a significant moral reason to select the child who, given his or her genetic endowment, can be expected to enjoy the most well-being. In the first part of this paper, we introduce PB, explain its content, grounds, and implications, and defend it against various objections. In the second part, we argue that PB is superior to competing principles of procreative selection such as that of procreative autonomy. In the third part of the paper, we consider the relation between PB and disability. We develop a revisionary account of disability, in which disability is a species of instrumental badness that is context- and person-relative. Although PB instructs us to aim to reduce disability in future children whenever possible, it does not privilege the normal. What matters is not whether future children meet certain biological or statistical norms, but what level of well-being they can be expected to have



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

987 (#14,380)

6 months
73 (#69,874)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Guy Kahane
University of Oxford

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references