The Absolute and the Failure to Think of the Ontological Difference Heidegger's Critique of Hegel

Studia Phaenomenologica 8:453-472 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine Heidegger’s critique of Hegel and to determine whether it is justified. Heidegger claims that Hegel tries to reduce everything to a single absolute entity, to the absolute knowing subject. The result is the identification of being and nothing, as Hegel formulates it at the beginning of his Logic. Hegel identifies being with nothing because being has no references, no predicates, no properties. Heidegger agrees with Hegel that being and nothing are the same, but in completely different respects. They are the same because only entity actually exists, i.e. as an existent being. But Being itself does not exist, and should be conceived in an utterly different way from entity. And since Being cannot “be” it is a non-entity and therefore nothing

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
10 (#395,257)

6 months
468 (#42,940)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alon Segev
University of Illinois at Springfield

Citations of this work

Nishitani’s Critique of Hegel in Prajñā and Reason.Edward Kwok & Gregory S. Moss - forthcoming - Journal of East Asian Philosophy:1-29.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references