Order:
See also
Alon Segev
University of Illinois at Springfield
  1. The Absolute and the Failure to Think of the Ontological Difference Heidegger's Critique of Hegel.Alon Segev - 2008 - Studia Phaenomenologica 8:453-472.
    The aim of this paper is to examine Heidegger’s critique of Hegel and to determine whether it is justified. Heidegger claims that Hegel tries to reduce everything to a single absolute entity, to the absolute knowing subject. The result is the identification of being and nothing, as Hegel formulates it at the beginning of his Logic. Hegel identifies being with nothing because being has no references, no predicates, no properties. Heidegger agrees with Hegel that being and nothing are the same, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Political readings of Descartes in Continental thought.Alon Segev - 2019 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    Home and exile -- Progress: Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Georges Sorel and Martin Heidegger -- Franz Baader: Cogitor Ergo Sum -- Edmund Husserl: the crisis of the European man -- Martin Heidegger: Homo Est Brutum Bestiale -- Franz Borkenau: Cartesianism and the exploitation of man and nature -- Franz Böhm: German philosophy at war with Cartesianism.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Thinking and killing: philosophical discourse in the shadow of the Third Reich.Alon Segev - 2013 - Berlin: De Gruyter.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  11
    Leaving the “Real Hume” in Peace and Reading the Dialogues from a Moral Perspective.Alon Segev - 2008 - Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 8 (2):1-12.
    This paper offers a new reading of Hume’s much discussed Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779/2000) which shows that, in contrast to what commentators tend to ascribe to Hume, the crux of the text is not epistemological-ontological – that is, not the arguments in favour of and against God’s existence – but moral. It is shown that, although most of the epistemologicalontological pro-and-contra arguments are quite weak, Hume’s interlocutors nevertheless cling to their theses from beginning to end, with the reason for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark