BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):63 (2016)

Authors
Catherine Barrett
Memorial University of Newfoundland
T. Herzog
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Abstract
The focus on translational research in clinical trials has the potential to generate clinically relevant genetic data that could have importance to patients. This raises challenging questions about communicating relevant genetic research results to individual patients. An exploratory pharmacogenetic analysis was conducted in the international ovarian cancer phase III trial, AGO-OVAR 16, which found that patients with clinically important germ-line BRCA1/2 mutations had improved progression-free survival prognosis. Mechanisms to communicate BRCA results were evaluated, because these findings may be beneficial to patients and their families. Communicating individual BRCA results was not anticipated during clinical trial design. Consequently, options were not available for patients to indicate their preference for receiving their individual results when they signed pharmacogenetic informed consent. Differences in local requirements, clinical practice, and opinion regarding the ethical aspects of how to convey genetic results to patients are all potential barriers to returning individual BRCA results to patients. Communicating the aggregate BRCA result from this study provided clinical investigators with a mechanism to disseminate the overall study finding to patients while taking individual circumstances, local guidelines and clinical practice into account. This study illustrates the importance of increasing the clarity and scope of informed consent and the need for patient engagement to ensure clinical trial participants can indicate their preference regarding receipt of potentially important individual pharmacogenetic results. This study was registered in the NCT Clinical Trial Registry under NCT00866697 on March 19, 2009, following approval from participating ethics committees.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1186/s12910-016-0144-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Pharmacogenetics: Ethical Issues.Margit Sutrop - 2004 - Bioethics 18 (4):iii-viii.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Protection of Patients' Rights in Clinical Trials.Marek Czarkowski - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138.
Therapeutic Inferences for Individual Patients.Luis Flores - 2015 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 21 (3):440-447.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-10-22

Total views
21 ( #531,949 of 2,499,074 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #419,059 of 2,499,074 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes