‘Risky’ research and participants' interests: the ethics of phase 2C clinical trials

Clinical Ethics 6 (2):91-96 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Biomedical research involving human participants is highly regulated and subject to stringent ethical requirements. Clinical research ethics, regulation and policy have tended to focus almost exclusively on the protection of participants' interests against harms that might result from taking part in research. Less consideration, however, has been given to the interests that patients may themselves have in research participation, even in trials that may be beyond the bounds of current clinical research practice. In this paper, we consider the case of a suggested extension to clinical trial protocols to explore the ethics of participation in ‘risky’ research. We argue that patients may have a strong interest in taking part in research, and that even when greater-than-usual risks may be present, such research can be both ethically and scientifically justified. Finally, we suggest that there might be scope in some cases to assert a right to participate in research, and that the possibility of such a right merits further consideration

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook.Marion Danis (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Safeguarding children in clinical research.S. D. Edwards - 2012 - Nursing Ethics 19 (4):530-537.
Subversive Subjects: Rule‐Breaking and Deception in Clinical Trials.Rebecca Dresser - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (4):829-840.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
41 (#386,242)

6 months
5 (#625,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Sarah Chan
University of Edinburgh
John Terence Harris
Birkbeck College