From what should we protect future generations: Germ-line therapy or genetic screening?

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (1):17-24 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses the issue of whether we have responsibilities to future generations with respect to genetic screening, including for purposes of selective abortion or discard. Future generations have been discussed at length among scholars. The concept of ‘Guardianfor Future Generations’ is tackled and its main criticisms discussed. Whilst germ-line cures, it is argued, can only affect family trees, genetic screening and testing can have wider implications. If asking how this may affect future generations is a legitimate question and since we indeed make retrospective moral judgements, it would be wise to consider that future generations will make the same retrospective judgements on us. Moreover such technologies affect present embryos to which we indeed can be considered to have an obligation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
67 (#249,240)

6 months
8 (#415,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Is there a Mediterranean bioethics?Pierre Mallia - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (4):419-429.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Future generations: Further problems.Derek Parfit - 1982 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 11 (2):113-172.
Geneticization: The Cyprus Paradigm.Henk ten Have & Rogeer Hoedemaekers - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):274-287.

Add more references