Authors
Benjamin McKean
Ohio State University
Abstract
Immanuel Kant’s political philosophy has enjoyed renewed attention as an egalitarian alternative to contemporary inequality since it seems to uncompromisingly reassert the primacy of the state over the economy, enabling it to defend the modern welfare state against encroaching neoliberal markets. However, I argue that, when understood as a free-standing approach to politics, Kant’s doctrine of right shares essential features with the prevailing theories that legitimate really existing economic inequality. Like Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, Kant understands the state’s function as essentially coercive and, in justifying state coercion, he adopts a narrow conception of political freedom that formally preserves the right to choose while denying that the range of choices one actually has can be a matter of justice. As a result, Kant cannot identify various forms of social pressure as potential injustices even as he recognizes their power to create and sustain troubling inequalities. For both Kant and the neoliberals, the result is that economic relations almost never count as unjust forms of coercion, no matter how unequal they are. Views that identify coercion as the trigger for duties of justice are thus particularly ill-suited to orient us to contemporary inequality.
Keywords Kant  distributive justice  neoliberalism  freedom  inequality
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13698230.2019.1658481
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problem of Global Justice.Thomas Nagel - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113-147.
Capitalism and Freedom.Milton Friedman - 1962 - Ethics 74 (1):70-72.
Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - In Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37-108.
Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy.Michael Blake - 2001 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3):257-296.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Penal Coercion in Contexts of Social Injustice.Roberto Gargarella - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):21-38.
Kant on Human Progress and Global Inequality.Fausto Corvino - 2019 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75 (1):477-512.
The Nature of Political Coercion: An Analysis and Justification.Wei Han - 2004 - Dissertation, The University of Connecticut
Kants Volk von Teufeln und sein Staat.Michael Pawlik - 2006 - Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik 14.
Kant on Strict Right.Ben Laurence - 2018 - Philosophers' Imprint 18.
Moral Coercion.Saba Bazargan - 2014 - Philosophers' Imprint 14.
Coercion, Inequality and the International Property Regime.Eric Cavallero - 2010 - Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1):16-31.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-25

Total views
192 ( #59,842 of 2,498,540 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #23,492 of 2,498,540 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes