Kant on sex and marriage: The implications for the same-sex marriage debate

Kant Studien 101 (3):309-330 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


When examined critically, Kant's views on sex and marriage give us the tools to defend same-sex marriage on moral grounds. The sexual objectification of one's partner can only be overcome when two people take responsibility for one another's overall well-being, and this commitment is enforced through legal coercion. Kant's views on the unnaturalness of homosexuality do not stand up to scrutiny, and he cannot (as he often tries to) restrict the purpose of sex to procreation. Kant himself rules out marriage only when the partners cannot give themselves to one another equally – that is, if there is inequality of exchange. Because same-sex marriage would be between equals and would allow homosexuals to express their desire in a morally appropriate way, it ought to be legalized.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,857

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

781 (#12,043)

6 months
26 (#60,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Altman
Central Washington University

Citations of this work

Kant and Women.Helga Varden - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (4):653-694.
Kant on the Law of Marriage.Allan Beever - 2013 - Kantian Review 18 (3):339-362.
Kant y el incesto.Jassir Enrique Hernández Castilla - 2020 - Con-Textos Kantianos 1 (11):8-36.
Kant on education and improvement: Themes and problems.Martin Sticker & David Bakhurst - 2021 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 55 (6):909-920.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references