Should Routine Childhood Immunizations Serve as an Exemplar of Minimal Risk in United States Regulation of Research Involving Children? A Closer Look at the Minimal Risk Threshold

Dissertation, Vanderbilt University (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The title question serves as the framework for a clinical research ethics inquiry having both regulatory and clinical implications. The overall structure of the inquiry is shaped by an hypothesis gleaned from the works of Paul Ramsey. That hypothesis states that acceptable risk in medical practice can become conflated for purposes of "minimal risk" in research practice involving children. The result of such conflation is that risk justified by therapeutic benefit may become analogized to research risk justified on the basis of social aims. The project as a whole utilizes historical and comparative methods to press Ramsey's notion in regard to the RCI Exemplar Question. ;The dissertation is divided into two parts. Chapters I--IV explore the political roots of informed consent. Risk-minimizing philosophy inherent in early consent theory provides historical access to a paradigm focused upon managing transference between medical authority over therapeutic risk and medical authority over risk/benefit analysis in research practice. That paradigm is the Nuremberg Code. Historical material regarding the Nuremberg Doctors' Trial is distilled, leading to the Nuremberg Method, a descriptive methodology. I conclude Part I by demonstrating the qualitative measures possible when using the Method to elucidate development of World Medical Association ethics codes from 1949 to 1996, particularly as it reveals the reclamation of medical authority over research practice. ;Part II is formulated as a regulatory and clinical analysis of research involving children. Current U.S. human subjects protections regulations are reviewed, critiqued by way of the Method, and then considered for their practical significance . The RCI exemplar is tested for risk conflation by means of case analysis using recent research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association . I conclude that the National Commission's assignment of the RCI exemplar undermines special protections for research involving children and is thus unacceptable

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Minimal Risk in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses.Carson Strong - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):529-538.
Minimal risk as an international ethical standard in research.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (3):351 – 378.
Why the Debate over Minimal Risk Needs to be Reconsidered.Ariella Binik & Charles Weijer - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (4):387-405.
Can informed consent to research be adapted to risk?Danielle Bromwich & Annette Rid - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):521-528.
Rethinking Risk in Pediatric Research.Kathleen Cranley Glass & Ariella Binik - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (3):567-576.
Pediatric Participation in Non-Therapeutic Research.Marilyn C. Morris - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (3):665-672.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references