Pediatric Magnetic Resonance Research and the Minimal-Risk Standard

IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (5):1-6 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While an accurate assessment of risk is always important, it is especially so in pediatric research. Recognizing the pivotal nature of the minimal-risk standard, we set out to determine under what circumstances pediatric magnetic resonance imaging research does or does not meet this standard. We found that while the physical and psychological risks that attend the MRI procedure do not exceed minimal risk, the sedation and contrast enhancement that are sometimes associated with MRI research do, as both exceed the level of risk encountered by typical, healthy children in their everyday experiences

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rethinking Risk in Pediatric Research.Kathleen Cranley Glass & Ariella Binik - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (3):567-576.
Risk standards for pediatric research: Rethinking the.David Wendler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):187-198.
Risk Standards for Pediatric Research: Rethinking the Grimes Ruling.David Wendler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):187-198.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Consent to Pediatric Research: A Couple of Distinctions.Carlo Petrini - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (1):37 - 38.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references