Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):521-528 (2015)

Danielle Bromwich
University of Massachusetts, Boston
Annette Rid
University of Zürich
The current ethical and regulatory framework for research is often charged with burdening investigators and impeding socially valuable research. To address these concerns, a growing number of research ethicists argue that informed consent should be adapted to the risks of research participation. This would require less rigorous consent standards in low-risk research than in high-risk research. However, the current discussion is restricted to cases of research in which the risks of research participation are outweighed by the potential clinical benefits for the individual research participant. Furthermore, current proposals do not address the worry that risk-adapted informed consent may result in enrolling participants into research without their autonomous authorization. In this paper, we show how the standard view of informed consent – consent as autonomous authorization – can be adapted to risk even when the research does not have a favourable risk-benefit profile for the participant. Our argument has two important implications: first, it implies that current and proposed consent standards are not adequately calibrated to risk and, second, that consent standards also need to be adapted to factors other than risk.
Keywords Medical Research  Consent  Risk  Bioethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2013-101912
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Harm to Self.Joel Feinberg - 1986 - Oxford University Press, USA.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Two Models of Informed Consent.Lynn A. Jansen - 2021 - Social Philosophy and Policy 38 (2):50-71.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

De Minimis Risk: A Proposal for a New Category of Research Risk.Abraham Schwab - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (11):1-7.
Genetic Research, Adolescents, and Informed Consent.Robert F. Weir & Jay R. Horton - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (4).
Can Broad Consent Be Informed Consent?M. Sheehan - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):226-235.
Broadening Consent--And Diluting Ethics?B. Hofmann - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2):125-129.


Added to PP index

Total views
289 ( #36,856 of 2,506,011 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #38,624 of 2,506,011 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes