Exempting All Minimal-Risk Research from IRB Review: Pruning or Poisoning the Regulatory Tree?

IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (2):9-14 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In a recent commentary, Kim and colleagues argued that minimal-risk research should be deregulated so that such studies do not require review by an institutional review board. They claim that regulation of minimal-risk studies provides no adequate counterbalancing good and instead leads to a costly human subjects oversight system. We argue that the counterbalancing good of regulating minimal-risk studies is that oversight exists to ensure that respect for persons and justice requirements are satisfied when they otherwise might not be



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Minimal Risk in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses.Carson Strong - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):529-538.


Added to PP

286 (#40,487)

6 months
15 (#60,616)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Mahesh Ananth
Indiana University South Bend
Michael Scheessele
Indiana University South Bend

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references