IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (2):9-14 (2012)
AbstractIn a recent commentary, Kim and colleagues argued that minimal-risk research should be deregulated so that such studies do not require review by an institutional review board. They claim that regulation of minimal-risk studies provides no adequate counterbalancing good and instead leads to a costly human subjects oversight system. We argue that the counterbalancing good of regulating minimal-risk studies is that oversight exists to ensure that respect for persons and justice requirements are satisfied when they otherwise might not be
Similar books and articles
When "Minimal Risk" Research Yields Clinically-Significant Data, Maybe the Risks Aren't So Minimal.Helen M. Sharp & Robert D. Orr - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):32-36.
Conflict and Convergence: The Ethics Review of Action Research. [REVIEW]Michael Owen - 2006 - Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4):61-75.
Minimal Risk in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses.Carson Strong - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):529-538.
Risk in Emergency Research Using a Waiver of/Exception From Consent: Implications of a Structured Approach for Institutional Review Board Review.Andrew D. McRae, Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz & Charles Weijer - unknown
Human Participants Challenges in Youth-Focused Research: Perspectives and Practices of IRB Administrators.Diane K. Wagener, Amy K. Sporer, Mary Simmerling, Jennifer L. Flome, Christina An & Susan J. Curry - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):335 – 349.
Is Compliance a Professional Virtue of Researchers? Reflections on Promoting the Responsible Conduct of Research.James M. DuBois - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):383 – 395.
Protecting the Navajo People Through Tribal Regulation of Research.Doug Brugge & Mariam Missaghian - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):491-507.
The Trace Deletion Hypothesis and the Tree-Pruning Hypothesis: Still Valid Characterizations of Broca's Aphasia.Yosef Grodzinsky - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):55-64.
Ethics of Risk Analysis and Regulatory Review: From Bio- to Nanotechnology. [REVIEW]Jennifer Kuzma & John C. Besley - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (2):149-162.
The Role of Controversial Research in the IRB's Risk/Benefit Analysis.John Lunstroth - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):14-16.
Observational Research with Adolescents: A Framework for the Management of the Parental Permission. [REVIEW]Ruiz-Canela Miguel, Burgo Cristina Lopez-del, Carlos Silvia, Calatrava Maria, Beltramo Carlos, Osorio Alfonso & de Irala Jokin - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):2-.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads