Errors of Omission in English‐Speaking Children's Production of Plurals and the Past Tense: The Effects of Frequency, Phonology, and Competition

Cognitive Science 30 (6):1027-1052 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How do English‐speaking children inflect nouns for plurality and verbs for the past tense? We assess theoretical answers to this question by considering errors of omission, which occur when children produce a stem in place of its inflected counterpart (e.g., saying “dress” to refer to 5 dresses). A total of 307 children (aged 3;11–9;9) participated in 3 inflection studies. In Study 1, we show that errors of omission occur until the age of 7 and are more likely with both sibilant regular nouns (e.g., dress) and irregular nouns (e.g., man) than regular nouns (e.g., dog). Sibilant nouns are more likely to be inflected if they are high frequency. In Studies 2 and 3, we show that similar effects apply to the inflection of verbs and that there is an advantage for “regular‐like” irregulars whose inflected form, but not stem form, ends in d/t. The results imply that (a) stems and inflected forms compete for production and (b) children generalize both product‐oriented and source‐oriented schemas when learning about inflectional morphology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,286

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Overtensing and the effect of regularity.Joseph Paul Stemberger - 2002 - Cognitive Science 26 (6):737-766.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
37 (#713,146)

6 months
2 (#1,454,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile