The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC

Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):815-820 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The history of the National Health Service research ethics system in the UK and some of the key drivers for its change into the present system are described. It is suggested that the key drivers were the unnecessary delay of research, the complexity of the array of processes and contradictions between research ethics committee (REC) decisions. It is then argued that the primary drivers for this change are and will be replicated by the systems of research ethics review being put in place at UK universities in response to the Economic and Social Research Council research ethics framework. It is argued that this is particularly problematic for multi-centre review and for researchers who switch institutions. Finally, some potential solutions to this problem and their feasibility are discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reassessing the Role of the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee.Merryn Ekberg - 2012 - Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (4):335-352.
Tower of babel: The evidence against the new creationism.John S. Wilkins - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):302 – 304.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
51 (#310,975)

6 months
15 (#164,728)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Hunter
University of Adelaide