Altered Inheritance: Crispr and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing

Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

With the advent of CRISPR gene-editing technology, designer babies have become a reality. Françoise Baylis insists that scientists alone cannot decide the terms of this new era in human evolution. Members of the public, with diverse interests and perspectives, must have a role in determining our future as a species.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan & Bahadur Singh - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):597-599.
CRISPR-Cas changing biology?Janella Baxter - 2019 - Biology and Philosophy 34 (1):15.
“Editing”: A Productive Metaphor for Regulating CRISPR.Ben Merriman - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):62-64.
CRISPR Critters and CRISPR Cracks.R. Alta Charo & Henry T. Greely - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):11-17.
Nurturing or Purifying the Human Genome: Promises and Pitfalls of CRISPR Germline Editing.Evelyne Shuster - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):299-304.
Trust in Science: CRISPR–Cas9 and the Ban on Human Germline Editing.Stephan Guttinger - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1077-1096.
Human germline editing: a historical perspective.Michel Morange - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39 (4):34.
Debating Ethical Issues in Genome Editing Technology.Renzong Qiu - 2016 - Asian Bioethics Review 8 (4):307-326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-31

Downloads
56 (#284,425)

6 months
30 (#106,135)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?