Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies

Neuroethics 14 (3):365-386 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Advancements in novel neurotechnologies, such as brain computer interfaces and neuromodulatory devices such as deep brain stimulators, will have profound implications for society and human rights. While these technologies are improving the diagnosis and treatment of mental and neurological diseases, they can also alter individual agency and estrange those using neurotechnologies from their sense of self, challenging basic notions of what it means to be human. As an international coalition of interdisciplinary scholars and practitioners, we examine these challenges and make recommendations to mitigate negative consequences that could arise from the unregulated development or application of novel neurotechnologies. We explore potential ethical challenges in four key areas: identity and agency, privacy, bias, and enhancement. To address them, we propose democratic and inclusive summits to establish globally-coordinated ethical and societal guidelines for neurotechnology development and application, new measures, including “Neurorights,” for data privacy, security, and consent to empower neurotechnology users’ control over their data, new methods of identifying and preventing bias, and the adoption of public guidelines for safe and equitable distribution of neurotechnological devices.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,108

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary on "Neurotechnologies, Relational Autonomy, and Authenticity".Anna Gotlib - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (1):120-128.
Introduction to the Special Section: Feminist Approaches to Neurotechnologies.Sara Goering & Laura Specker Sullivan - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (1):89-97.
Commentary on "Neurotechnologies, Relational Autonomy, and Authenticity".Marya Schechtman - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (1):129-133.
Making our own luck.David Hodgson - 2007 - Ratio 20 (3):278–292.
Design and Engineering Ethics Considerations for Neurotechnologies.H. F. Machiel van Der Loos - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (3):303-307.


Added to PP

22 (#552,917)

6 months
6 (#146,810)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Laura Specker Sullivan
Fordham University
Michelle Trang Pham
Michigan State University
Sara Goering
University of Washington
7 more

References found in this work

The Illusion of Conscious Will.Daniel M. Wegner - 2002 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Altered Inheritance: Crispr and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Françoise Baylis - 2019 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Deep Brain Stimulation, Authenticity and Value.Pugh Jonathan, Maslen Hannah & Savulescu Julian - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (4):640-657.

View all 52 references / Add more references