25 found
Order:
  1. The e-z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models.Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner & Alexander Pollatsek - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):445-476.
    The E-Z Reader model (Reichle et al. 1998; 1999) provides a theoretical framework for understanding how word identification, visual processing, attention, and oculomotor control jointly determine when and where the eyes move during reading. In this article, we first review what is known about eye movements during reading. Then we provide an updated version of the model (E-Z Reader 7) and describe how it accounts for basic findings about eye movement control in reading. We then review several alternative models of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations  
  2.  22
    Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.Erik D. Reichle, Alexander Pollatsek, Donald L. Fisher & Keith Rayner - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (1):125-157.
  3.  23
    Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading.George W. McConkie & Keith Rayner - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (5):365-368.
  4.  16
    Eye movements and identifying words in parafoveal vision.Keith Rayner & Robert E. Morrison - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 17 (3):135-138.
  5.  19
    Visual.vs. phonemic contributions to the importance of the initial letter in word identification.Carla J. Posnansky & Keith Rayner - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 11 (3):188-190.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  6.  22
    Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: Evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.Elizabeth R. Schotter, Klinton Bicknell, Ian Howard, Roger Levy & Keith Rayner - 2014 - Cognition 131 (1):1-27.
  7. Integrating text and pictorial information: eye movements when looking at print advertisements.Keith Rayner, Caren M. Rotello, Andrew J. Stewart, Jessica Keir & Susan A. Duffy - 2001 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 7 (3):219.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  8.  20
    Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks: A unified framework for understanding the eye–mind link.Erik D. Reichle, Alexander Pollatsek & Keith Rayner - 2012 - Psychological Review 119 (1):155-185.
  9.  11
    The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: evidence from proofreading and eye movements.Debra Jared, Betty Ann Levy & Keith Rayner - 1999 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128 (3):219.
  10.  40
    Taking on semantic commitments, II: collective versus distributive readings.Lyn Frazier, Jeremy M. Pacht & Keith Rayner - 1999 - Cognition 70 (1):87-104.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  11.  47
    Eye movements in reading: Models and data.Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek & Erik D. Reichle - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):507-518.
    The issues the commentators have raised and which we address, include: the debate over how attention is allocated during reading; our distinction between early and late stages of lexical processing; our assumptions about saccadic programming; the determinants of skipping and refixations; and the role that higher-level linguistic processing may play in influencing eye movements during reading. In addition, we provide a discussion of model development and principles for evaluating and comparing models. Although we acknowledge that E-Z Reader is incomplete, we (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  12.  56
    Is Covert attention really unnecessary?Alexander Pollatsek & Keith Rayner - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):695-696.
    We are largely in agreement with the Findlay & Walker model. However, they appear to dismiss the role of covert spatial attention in tasks in which people are free to move their eyes. We argue that an account of the facts about the perceptual span in reading requires a window of attention not centered around the fovea. Moreover, a computational model of reading that we (Reichle et al. 1998) developed gives a good account of eye movement control in reading and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  13.  35
    Parafoveal processing during reading is reduced across a morphological boundary.Denis Drieghe, Alexander Pollatsek, Barbara J. Juhasz & Keith Rayner - 2010 - Cognition 116 (1):136-142.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14.  17
    Extending the E‐Z Reader Model of Eye Movement Control to Chinese Readers.Keith Rayner, Xingshan Li & Alexander Pollatsek - 2007 - Cognitive Science 31 (6):1021-1033.
    Chinese readers' eye movements were simulated in the context of the E-Z Reader model, which was developed to account for the eye movements of readers of English. Despite obvious differences between English and Chinese, the model did a fairly good job of simulating the eye movements of Chinese readers. The successful simulation suggests that the control of eye movements in reading Chinese is similar to that in an alphabetic language such as English.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  15.  24
    Discourse influences during parsing are delayed.Keith Rayner, Simon Garrod & Charles A. Perfetti - 1992 - Cognition 45 (2):109-139.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  16.  13
    Eye movement latencies for parafoveally presented words.Keith Rayner - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 11 (1):13-16.
  17.  10
    Icons, visual buffers, and eye movements.Keith Rayner - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):36-37.
  18.  48
    On the functional significance of express saccades.Martin H. Fischer & Keith Rayner - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (3):577-577.
  19.  3
    Behavioral Experimentation.Alexander Pollatsek & Keith Rayner - 2017 - In William Bechtel & George Graham (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 352–370.
    How might one study the complex processes of the mind? The method favored by early philosophers and psychologists was introspection. While introspection is still used today, perhaps the major source of evidence used by cognitive scientists to understand cognition is data collected from experiments in which subjects are engaged in some type of relevant task. While these data all come from some type of experiment, the methods differ widely, and, as we shall see, the type of method is strongly influenced (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  22
    Against semantic preprocessing in parafoveal vision.Keith Rayner - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (1):46-47.
  21. Language processing.Keith Rayner & Charles Clifton - 2002 - In J. Wixted & H. Pashler (eds.), Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology. Wiley.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Research Report.Eyal M. Reingold & Keith Rayner - unknown
    A critical prediction of the E-Z Reader model is that experimental manipulations that disrupt early encoding of visual and orthographic features of the fixated word without affecting subsequent lexical processing should influence the processing difficulty of the fixated word without affecting the processing of the next word. We tested this prediction by monitoring participants’ eye movements while they read sentences in which a target word was presented either normally or altered. In the critical condition, the contrast between the target word (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23.  8
    Sequential masking during eye fixations in reading.Maria L. Slowiaczek & Keith Rayner - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (3):175-178.
  24. Language comprehension, methodologies for studying.Matthew S. Starr & Keith Rayner - 2003 - In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group.
  25.  23
    Top-down influences in the interactive alignment model: The power of the situation model.Tessa Warren & Keith Rayner - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):211-211.
    Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) model is an innovative and important step in the study of naturalistic language. However, the simplicity of its mechanisms for dialogue coordination may be overstated and the hypothesized direct priming channel between interlocutors' situation models is questionable. A complete specification of the model will require more investigation of the role of top-down inhibition among representations.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark