Top-down influences in the interactive alignment model: The power of the situation model

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):211-211 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) model is an innovative and important step in the study of naturalistic language. However, the simplicity of its mechanisms for dialogue coordination may be overstated and the hypothesized direct priming channel between interlocutors' situation models is questionable. A complete specification of the model will require more investigation of the role of top-down inhibition among representations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,429

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interactive Alignment: Priming or Memory Retrieval?Michael Kaschak & Arthur Glenberg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):201-202.
Full Alignment of Some but Not All Representations in Dialogue.Holly P. Branigan - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):191-192.
Beyond Linguistic Alignment.Allan Mazur - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):205-206.
Dialogue: Can Two Be Cheaper Than One?Sam Glucksberg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):199-199.
Situation Alignment and Routinization in Language Acquisition.Peter F. Dominey - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):195-195.
Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.
A Call for More Dialogue and More Details.J. Cooper Cutting - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):194-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
19 (#582,644)

6 months
1 (#416,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references