Is Covert attention really unnecessary?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):695-696 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We are largely in agreement with the Findlay & Walker model. However, they appear to dismiss the role of covert spatial attention in tasks in which people are free to move their eyes. We argue that an account of the facts about the perceptual span in reading requires a window of attention not centered around the fovea. Moreover, a computational model of reading that we (Reichle et al. 1998) developed gives a good account of eye movement control in reading and would be unable to do so without relying heavily on covert attention.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Linking Covert and overt attention.James J. Clark - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):676-677.
Is there more to visual attention than meets the eye?Cyril Latimer - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):690-691.
Eye movements in reading: Models and data.Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek & Erik D. Reichle - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):507-518.
Regressions and eye movements: Where and when.Manuel Perea & Manuel Carreiras - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):497-497.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
56 (#293,769)

6 months
11 (#272,000)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?