Results for ' single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)'

8 found
Order:
  1.  11
    Functional Polymorphisms in Oxytocin and Dopamine Pathway Genes and the Development of Dispositional Compassion Over Time: The Young Finns Study.Henrik Dobewall, Aino Saarinen, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen, Terho Lehtimäki & Mirka Hintsanen - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
    Background: We define compassion as an enduring disposition that centers upon empathetic concern for another person's suffering and the motivation to act to alleviate it. The contribution of specific candidate genes to the development of dispositional compassion for others is currently unknown. We examine candidate genes in the oxytocin and dopamine signaling pathways.Methods: In a 32-year follow-up of the Young Finns Study, we examined with multiple indicators latent growth curve modeling the molecular genetic underpinnings of dispositional compassion for others across (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  48
    Oxytocin and Opioid Receptor Gene Polymorphisms Associated with Greeting Behavior in Dogs.Enikő Kubinyi, Melinda Bence, Dora Koller, Michele Wan, Eniko Pergel, Zsolt Ronai, Maria Sasvari-Szekely & Ádám Miklósi - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8:276465.
    Meeting humans is an everyday experience for most companion dogs, and their behavior in these situations and its genetic background is of major interest. Previous research in our laboratory reported that in German shepherd dogs the lack of G allele, and in Border collies the lack of A allele, of the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) 19208A/G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was linked to increased friendliness, which suggests that although broad traits are affected by genetic variability, the specific links between alleles (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  24
    Variations on a Chip: Technologies of Difference in Human Genetics Research.Ramya M. Rajagopalan & Joan H. Fujimura - 2018 - Journal of the History of Biology 51 (4):841-873.
    In this article we examine the history of the production of microarray technologies and their role in constructing and operationalizing views of human genetic difference in contemporary genomics. Rather than the “turn to difference” emerging as a post-Human Genome Project phenomenon, interest in individual and group differences was a central, motivating concept in human genetics throughout the twentieth century. This interest was entwined with efforts to develop polymorphic “genetic markers” for studying human traits and diseases. We trace the technological, methodological (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  14
    A gene–brain–behavior basis for familiarity bias in source preference.Robin Chark, Songfa Zhong, Shui Ying Tsang, Chiea Chuen Khor, Richard P. Ebstein, Hong Xue & Soo Hong Chew - 2022 - Theory and Decision 92 (3-4):531-567.
    Source preference in which equally distributed risks may be valued differently has been receiving increasing attention. Using subjects recruited in Berkeley, Fox and Tversky demonstrate a familiarity bias in source preference—betting on a less than even-chance event based on San Francisco temperature is valued more than betting on a better than even-chance event based on Istanbul temperature. Neophobia is associated with the amygdala which is GABA-rich and is known to be modulated by benzodiazepines as anxiolytic agents that enhance the activity (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  19
    Individual and Collective Rights in Genomic Data.David Koepsell - 2015-03-19 - In Michael Boylan (ed.), Who Owns You? Wiley. pp. 20–39.
    This chapter contains sections titled: The Current Conundrum The Objects of Our Study The Legal Framework So Far Special Challenges of DNA Property and Parts Autonomy, Individuality, and Personhood Economics and the Marketplace for Genes Ethics and Method An Outline for the Investigation The Challenge Ahead.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  4
    So, Who Owns You?David Koepsell - 2015-03-19 - In Michael Boylan (ed.), Who Owns You? Wiley. pp. 155–170.
    This chapter contains sections titled: Errors in the Law Problems of Personhood Other Potential Persons and Property Issues Our Common Genetic Heritage: What Does It Mean? Your Genome/Our Genome Future Issues: Where Do We Go from Here?
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  61
    “The Map of the Mexican’s Genome”: overlapping national identity, and population genomics. [REVIEW]Ernesto Schwartz-Marín & Irma Silva-Zolezzi - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):489-514.
    This paper explores the intersections between national identity and the production of medical/population genomics in Mexico. The ongoing efforts to construct a Haplotype Map of Mexican genetic diversity offers a unique opportunity to illustrate and analyze the exchange between the historic-political narratives of nationalism, and the material culture of genomic science. Haplotypes are central actants in the search for medically significant SNP’s (single nucleotide polymorphisms), as well as powerful entities involved in the delimitation of ancestry, temporality and variability ( (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  65
    Associations of prostate cancer risk variants with disease aggressiveness: results of the NCI-SPORE Genetics Working Group analysis of 18,343 cases. [REVIEW]Brian T. Helfand, Kimberly A. Roehl, Phillip R. Cooper, Barry B. McGuire, Liesel M. Fitzgerald, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin, Jean-Nicolas Cornu, Scott Bauer, Erin L. Van Blarigan, Xin Chen, David Duggan, Elaine A. Ostrander, Mary Gwo-Shu, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Shen-Chih Chang, Somee Jeong, Elizabeth T. H. Fontham, Gary Smith, James L. Mohler, Sonja I. Berndt, Shannon K. McDonnell, Rick Kittles, Benjamin A. Rybicki, Matthew Freedman, Philip W. Kantoff, Mark Pomerantz, Joan P. Breyer, Jeffrey R. Smith, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Dan Mercola, William B. Isaacs, Fredrick Wiklund, Olivier Cussenot, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Daniel J. Schaid, Lisa Cannon-Albright, Kathleen A. Cooney, Stephen J. Chanock, Janet L. Stanford, June M. Chan, John Witte, Jianfeng Xu, Jeannette T. Bensen, Jack A. Taylor & William J. Catalona - unknown
    © 2015, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.Genetic studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with the risk of prostate cancer. It remains unclear whether such genetic variants are associated with disease aggressiveness. The NCI-SPORE Genetics Working Group retrospectively collected clinicopathologic information and genotype data for 36 SNPs which at the time had been validated to be associated with PC risk from 25,674 cases with PC. Cases were grouped according to race, Gleason score and aggressiveness. Statistical analyses were used to compare (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark