- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Individual and Collective Rights in Genomic Data
In Michael Boylan (ed.), Who Owns You? Wiley. pp. 20–39 (2015-03-19)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: The Current Conundrum The Objects of Our Study The Legal Framework So Far Special Challenges of DNA Property and Parts Autonomy, Individuality, and Personhood Economics and the Marketplace for Genes Ethics and Method An Outline for the Investigation The Challenge Ahead.Author's Profile
Human Genome Project (HGP) current map of the human genome, giving high‐level view of landscape Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), consisting four bases Watson and Crick, revealing DNA DNA, directing protein production and metabolism single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
My notes
Similar books and articles
Individual and Collective Rights in Genomic Data: Preliminary Questions.David Koepsell - 2007 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 16 (1):151.
Dual Function of DNA Sequences: Protein-Coding Sequences Function as Transcriptional Enhancers.Naama Hirsch & Ramon Y. Birnbaum - 2015 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 58 (2):182-195.
Property rights in blood, genes and data: naturally yours?Jasper A. Bovenberg - 2006 - Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Administrative Developments: Celera Genomics to Complete DNA Map.Jennifer Doran - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (2):188-189.
Administrative Developments: Celera Genomics to Complete DNA Map.Jennifer Doran - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (2):188-189.
Scientific limitations and ethical ramifications of a non-representative human genome project: African american response. [REVIEW]Fatimah Jackson - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):155-170.
No one ‘owns’ the genome: The United States Supreme Court rules that human DNA cannot be patented.Eddie Hurter - 2013 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 6 (2):52.
Genomic mutation rates: what high‐throughput methods can tell us.Koodali T. Nishant, Nadia D. Singh & Eric Alani - 2009 - Bioessays 31 (9):912-920.
Gene Patents—A Pharmaceutical Perspective.Jack L. Tribble - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):429-432.
A new light on DNA replication from the inactive X chromosome.Mirit I. Aladjem & Haiqing Fu - 2014 - Bioessays 36 (6):591-597.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
13 (#1,066,279)
6 months
9 (#355,374)
2023-06-15
Downloads
13 (#1,066,279)
6 months
9 (#355,374)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-zhzfn uwo